nomel

18 ms·

1. 451.▲
   by nomel 5mo ago

   > near zero chance for you main customers workload What percent of this hardware is running inference for ReLU models? ;)
2. 452.▲
   by nomel 5mo ago

   Unless you're using a child account, where the guardian account enabled this feature, with intent, this isn't an issue! :D
3. 453.▲
   by nomel 5mo ago

   If you don't like CLAUDE.md, you can just add a memory/modify the plan agent to make an AGENTS.md. These aren't rigid systems. And, you don't have to tell it to look for an AGENTS.md, it'll just pick it up. First t
4. 454.▲
   by nomel 5mo ago

   You didn't touch on the most important aspect for cost: die area! How much die space ($) will that circuitry, that's probably statistically near zero chance for you main customers workload (who has model weight of 0 or 1!?), add.
5. 455.▲
   by nomel 5mo ago

   My read on it is "AI is taking over internet content generation, and we can't filter because we'll end up filtering everything that makes us the most money"
6. 456.▲
   by nomel 5mo ago

   For most people, CC is cheaper tokens for a SOTA model. What agentic platform would you recommend for those with API access (including other models)?
7. 457.▲
   by nomel 5mo ago

   Not sure why this is downvoted. Even if I wanted to, these questions aren't allowed in the company I work for, along with feedback related to "team fit". This is dictated by execs, dictated by legal, because it has nothing
8. 458.▲
   by nomel 5mo ago

   You can technically "enforce" this at runtime with __getattribute__ or decorators[1]. Maybe be evil and add 1000 "Private access not allowed: {name}" with 1 second delays between each. Aaaand, this flexibility is exactly
9. 459.▲
   by nomel 5mo ago

   I've noticed the following really helps (most important at end): 1. Have claude form the plan and converse with a simple "Note any concerns with this plan" type plan-critic agent. 2. Let it run. 3. After (with everything in c
10. 460.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    > Also I wonder how many folks honestly look in the mirror and think: how does the median programmer differ from an LLM. Once you step out of pure-software orgs, it becomes clear that most would benefit from having AI write code. There
11. 461.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    I think jj will never gain momentum because people only have a git mental model at this point, so won't be able to effectively reason about jj.
12. 462.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    Definitely not. Switch to a previous commit, make edits, changes propagate into the future commits (including into a git repo if you wish [1]) Jj is not git and is not a git tool, it just (thankfully) uses git as a backend, so you can still
13. 463.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    But it is a near law that the first to market attempts will fully embraces the deeply engrained culture of 差不多, until market forces beat it out of the product line.
14. 464.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    > If you don't agree, how many years into the future do we need until you would agree? Respectfully, I asked first. ;) > before we realize its a dead end (at best) You've declared the future, which doesn't leave much ro
15. 465.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    > But it was instantly a maintenance dead end. I gave up on this recently. It achieved the goal now, and in a year or two, when you actually want to add whatever feature, the SOTA AI will probably be able to clean it up as it does so
16. 466.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    Yes, just like the Samsung employees we're talking about.
17. 467.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    Yeah, I never understood why the top n statistics weren't included in the chat interfaces, to color the text!
18. 468.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    > seeing the possibilities has to involve some creativity. I would claim the graph exists, and seeing it is more of an knowledge problem. Creativity, to me, is the ability to reject existing edges and add nodes to the graph AND menta
19. 469.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    I feel this is the case whenever I "problem solve". I'm not really being creative, I'm pruning a graph of a conceptual space that already exists . The more possibilities I see, the easier it is to run more towards an op
20. 470.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    Or, it could be hardware that has a "clear flag on read" type behavior.
21. 471.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    All evidence points to yes, and from some of the least trustworthy sources of information on the planet [1]. [1] Glue pizza and eat rocks: Google AI search errors go viral: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd11gze
22. 472.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    This isn't just ads, trust in the mainstream media, itself, is very low [1], deservedly so in my opinion. The continuous lies by omission, the outright incorrect headlines/articles that they edit after a day, the lock-step messa
23. 473.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    Simple, don't trust what you see on the internet, which has been a constant since the mid 90's when it was invented.
24. 474.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    I'm very curious to see how polymarket fairs, compared to the news agencies. I suspect prediction markets will be the norm, going forward. Polls can't fully capture the element of anonymity that's required for an accurate po
25. 475.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    You know an org is in trouble when renaming products is celebrated.
26. 476.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    Project Hail Mary was largely real sets and a puppet .
27. 477.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    AI is already in a bunch of creative workflows. Just look at modern Photoshop. Selecting and hitting delete has AI infill for the background replacement. Creates can these video gen AI in various ways. There are some youtube channels of peo
28. 478.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    Note: Asking it the time does not work, since it guesses based on the git commit info.
29. 479.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    Sounds like you're a professional software developer. Profession does not make a nerd. ;)
30. 480.▲
    by nomel 5mo ago

    History class in high school, because I couldn't use my TI-83 without suspicion.