Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nocturnial
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
151.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
If you want raw data: out of the 1000 audio recordings the journalists could get their hands on, 153 were recorded without the trigger word. Google provided those audio recordings to language experts for transcription without account inform
152.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
>NSA's job is to eavesdrop on hostile foreign actors' communications I'm pretty sure the NSA also eavesdrops on friendly foreign actors. I'm also sure that the friendly foreign actors aren't pleased with it. I do
153.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
There was an agreement the US pulled out of. Which part of that agreement talked about ballistic missiles? I think you are confusing two separate things. One is a nuclear capable Iran and the other is about the military projection of conven
154.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
Fine, it orbits sagittarius A'*' with some very small wobbles caused by sol.
155.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
For anyone wondering why the one (1) day extra, microsoft has a fixed patching schedule. The patches were released on june 11 patch tuesday. They needed the extra day to check if it was included in the june 11 patches.
156.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
I thought his point in the blog was that it was indeed trivial to implement but when you think about all the consequences it becomes trickier to do it well. He makes that point at the end.
157.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
I'm not sure if I follow your line of reasoning. Suppose it wasn't a call to violence but rather a call to never speak or engage with that person again. That person can be fired and never be able to rent again... (I have examples
158.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
Maybe you're right and I'm too cynical, but I see this more like a PR piece to attract talent to their organization. I think the NSA has a real image problem. They released ghidra. They admitted it was a recruitment tool. They now
159.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
I know we should always assume good faith. From all the vulnerabilities they know, they chose to publish one that's known and only concerns outdated software. Maybe I'm too skeptical but when the NSA starts leaking fixes for zero
160.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
Ok fine "victim's family". I stand corrected. It's not like when we change the words to describe it, is going to change how they feel.
161.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
I wrote victim and not dead passenger as you falsely implied. The contracts are with the surviving familing members. If you don't consider them as victims then give me another word for it. edit: If you downvote me at least give me a ch
162.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
And how are they going to be held accountable? They already have several contracts which states victims can't sue the company. Maybe not everyone signed, but then it's about how much they can pay their lawyers.
163.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
A diplomat would say we could trust the FAA but now they need to be verified.
164.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
Why is this strange? You sue the company making the tool then they tell you in court it's not them but rather entity X who abused it and give you the documents to prove it. Then you sue entity X.
165.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
I thought the majority of the population was level 4. Level 4: Ignore it.
166.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
If they've found a better way of snooping then why announce it to the world instead of silently dropping the program? This sounds more like a public relations move instead of a technically inspired one.
167.
▲
by
nocturnial
7y ago
I wonder if recruitment was also a factor in making this decision. Recently they released ghidra which they admitted was mainly for recruitment purposes. If it's because of this, then it makes sense it's not worth it. Collecting m
168.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
What voting system are you using? If it's winner takes all then you're right. The head of state is indeed in charge of all departments. If it's more of a parliamentary system then the head of state needs to put x members in c
169.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
tldr: No idea From [1, page 6, 25]: "Effective enforcement of Union law requires that protection is granted to the broadest possible range of categories of persons, who, irrespective of whether they are EU citizens or thir
170.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
They even give an economic argument for this law. In a report to the EU commission they estimate this will result in potential benefits in the range of 5.8 to 9.6 billion euro.[1] This is only for public procurement. The two main conclusion
171.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
Wouldn't it be more sensible to give a range instead of a fixed date? I know it's not going to happen, but I think it would be more informative and honest. That way you could communicate better of how certain you are. There's
172.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
You can try openwrt: https://openwrt.org/ You can install several packages including adblock and cryptdns-proxy. Here's a list of supported routers: https://openwrt.org/toh/start
173.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
From the article: "...Mr. Molina had sometimes signed in to other people’s phones to check his Google account. That could lead someone to appear in two places at once, though it was not clear whether that happened in this case." I
174.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
The particle-antiparticle explanation is just an analogy and doesn't really cover what actually happens. I thought this video from PBS Space Time explains it really well while keeping it accessible for non-physicists: https:/
175.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
What are talking about? Is it because I said it was illegal instead of it being a crime? The first sentence you quoted was also part of a larger piece about we still need to see the proof that he actually sent it to someone else. So replyin
176.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
I think you read over the part where I said it was illegal. You don't need to invent scenarios, you can use the facts of this case. Manning already had access and didn't need the password to be cracked. Wikileaks already received
177.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
This is a very poor analogy and I think you know it. Cracking the password isn't the same as using it to log in. There are still some extra steps required. In the case of picking locks there are no extra steps, you gain access immediat
178.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
> So you can take away the data but you can't take away the fact that they had the data. I know and that's my point why it can't be considered as a payment.
179.
▲
by
nocturnial
8y ago
Suppose what everyone is saying is true: "We pay for the services companies provides us with our data". Normally, depending in which jurisdiction you're in, you could get your money back for "bad" service. If someon