noch

9 ms·

61.
Elon Musk isn't the only tech leader helping shape the Trump administration(washingtonpost.com)
4 points by noch 2y ago|1 comments
62.
The Metabolic Costs of Cognition(sciencedirect.com)
2 points by noch 2y ago|0 comments
63.
MindSpore Deep Learning Framework(mindspore.cn)
1 points by noch 2y ago|0 comments
64.
How to get your life together(s0md3v.github.io)
2 points by noch 2y ago|0 comments
65.
by noch 2y ago
> It's not realistic to make firm quantified predictions any more specific than what I have given. Then do you actually know what you're talking about or are you handwaving? I'm not trying to be offensive but business plan
66.
by noch 2y ago
> There is a lot of room in hardware, software, model training and model architecture left. Quantify this please? And make a firm prediction with approximate numbers/costs attached?
67.
by noch 2y ago
> You seem to be assuming that the rapid progress in AI will suddenly stop. > I think if you look at the history of compute, that is ridiculous. Making the models bigger or work more is making them smarter. It's better to talk ab
68.
by noch 2y ago
> That the market can stay irrational longer than people can stay solvent is also true. It's a myth that markets are irrational. It's a joke repeated amongst traders but fundamentally, we all know that markets simply aggregate
69.
by noch 2y ago
> I realised all the magick stuff was a circus and the people peddling it charlatans and clowns. Hear hear. Your comment reminded me of when Christopher Lee said, "Never get involved in the occult. You'll not only lose your mi
70.
DS V3's DeepThink CoT of "the typical inner product between 2 random vectors"(twitter.com)
1 points by noch 2y ago|0 comments
71.
by noch 2y ago
I somehow accidentally made you think that I was trying to have a debate about doomers, but I wasn't which is why I prefixed it with "fwiw" (meaning for-what-it's-worth; I'm a random on the internet, so my words are
72.
by noch 2y ago
> That logic applies for AI-cynics rather than AI-doomers Fwiw, I don't believe that there are any AI doomers. I've hung out in their forums for several years and watched all their lectures and debates and bookmarked all their
73.
by noch 2y ago
> What's the expected return on investment for "intelligence"? This is extremely hard to quantify […] if you listen to the AI-doomer folks, potentially an extremely negative return. Indeed. And that asymmetry is what makes
74.
by noch 2y ago
> Part of the risk is the possibility that a few key employees find a much more profitable business model and leave OpenAI, The fact that you can state this risk means that market participants already know this risk and account for it in
75.
by noch 2y ago
> There is no technical moat, but that doesn't mean there isn't a moat. Gruber writes: " My take on OpenAI is that both of the following are true: OpenAI currently offers, by far, the best product experience of any AI chat
76.
by noch 2y ago
> > Gold has been confiscated and expropriated from civilian hands > What? Smh. For someone whose most vivid recollection seems to be of The Great Depression, you somehow don't remember Executive Order 6102.
77.
by noch 2y ago
> I'm curious to know in what way you think FDR/Keynes got it wrong. No, you shouldn't be. I'm just a random guy on the internet. >> But why mess with the price signal? So that you can pick and choose winners an
78.
by noch 2y ago
> but some folks don't seem to accept the evidence and the historical record of what didn't work, and why we moved towards the current system. Some folks still think that FDR (and Keynes) got things wrong. They did get things w
79.
by noch 2y ago
> What would you do with it […] Bla bla bla. What I do with things in private is not really your business, actually. Please send me a useless Bitcoin today and I'll pay you useful money for your effort as described above. Let&#x
80.
by noch 2y ago
> Bitcoin is still useless Oh gosh. You're actually one of those people. Well, it's a pleasure to meet you! And since you feel Bitcoin is useless (I'm leaving the door wide open for a retort filled with cognitive dissona
81.
by noch 2y ago
> Also, 'printing money' is a feature, not a bug: it allows for currency needs to be met so that economic activity/growth can occur. We all know the Central Bank hymn book by now. That said, printing money doesn't cre
82.
by noch 2y ago
> Bitcoins are the most useless "asset" that there has ever been. At least beanie babies had some entertainment value and tulips look pretty. Hilariously, some people won't realize that your comment is almost entirely copy
83.
by noch 2y ago
> As long as the Bitcoin price goes up, that is a viable business. Okay, let's assume Bitcoin's price is going up forever, Laura. Right now, 16 years after Bitcoin was invented, that's a completely reasonable assumption. &
84.
The Rise and Future Fall of MicroStrategy(medium.com)
40 points by noch 2y ago|109 comments
85.
Building Bitcoin in Rust(braiins.com)
2 points by noch 2y ago|0 comments
86.
by noch 2y ago
> Tinygrad was another one, but they ended up getting frustrated with AMD and semi-pivoted to Nvidia. From their announcement on 20241219[^0]: " We are the only company to get AMD on MLPerf , and we have a completely custom driver
87.
The Heist [video](youtube.com)
2 points by noch 2y ago|0 comments
88.
by noch 2y ago
Your reply is rather long so I'll only respond to 2 sections to avoid us speculating randomly without actually referring to data or running actual experiments. To clarify: > That's why I find the prospect of making posting expe
89.
by noch 2y ago
> a point of wealth where someone can no longer afford to speak on these platforms, and that inevitably will prevent change, which tends to come from the people not well-served by the system as it is, i.e. poor people. "Change"
90.
by noch 2y ago
The article says: > The images and videos including necrophilia, bestiality and self-harm caused some moderators to faint, vomit, scream and run away from their desks, the filings allege. You might have heard the saying, common in policy

More ›