Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nobody9999
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
>Please don't be rude. [0]: "Google publicly announced in 2017 it would stop using Gmail content for ad targeting but continued to scan emails for spam, malware, and other non-ad functionality , which leaves room for ambiguity
62.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
Yeah, sure. Whatever you say. https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2025/05/07/googles-g... https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2025/11/gmail-is-read... h
63.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
I'd note that the link you posted is from September, 2025. Before any sale was made. What's more, the screenshot clearly shows that there's more beneath that message that's been cut off. I wonder what those results w
64.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
Oops. Missed that part. Not dishonesty, just carelessness. Since I'm old and don't use TikTok, I have no way to confirm or deny the results of searches on TikTok. If what GP claims (I doubt it) is true, that's certainly a pr
65.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
>Now if you search for the USS Liberty, you get no results and instead a hardcoded link to a 'holocaust museum' website as the only result. That's a lie. A search[0] shows these as the first three results: USS Liberty inci
66.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
Are you claiming that Project 2025[0] isn't a right wing thing? If, by you, the Heritage Foundation isn't right wing then what would be? That's not a rhetorical question. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki&#x
67.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
>Google knows users care about their privacy, and it made the promise in its terms precisely for that reason. People pay attention to this stuff, as the popularity of this story shows. Do Google users care about their privacy? I'd
68.
▲
New 3D map of Universe could solve dark energy mystery
(arstechnica.com)
1 points
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
|
0 comments
69.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
From Project 2025[0], published by the Heritage Foundation: Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as regis
70.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
>The problem is how do you know who's a criminal beforehand. Everyone is a criminal. Directed [per|pro]secution is a thing. And not a new one either[0]: If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men,
71.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
>Nevermind license plate readers have been collecting your data for decades. Nevermind you literally carry a tracking device on your person, likely 24/7. While the above is a difference in scale, the various "credit bureaus&quo
72.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
From TFA[0]: A new synthesis of astronomical measurements confirms a persistent mismatch that could point to physics beyond current models Also from TFA: Astronomers have sought to measure the expansion rate of the Universe
73.
▲
The Local Universe's Expansion Rate Clearer Than Ever. But Still Doesn't Add Up
(noirlab.edu)
3 points
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
|
1 comments
74.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
Not sure where you are, but this chart[0] should be enlightening WRT to current and future prospects. The bottom line is that if you can get through that last semester and graduate, your weekly earnings potential increases more than 50%.
75.
▲
Fossils reveal many complex animals existed before the Cambrian Explosion
(sciencenews.org)
3 points
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
|
0 comments
76.
▲
Our digital devices are putting our right to privacy at risk
(arstechnica.com)
7 points
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
|
0 comments
77.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
>So in other words you could have easily blocked the spam emails you were complaining about after the first one arrived. That's not what I said at all[2]. In fact, I said[0]: I was required to install a smartphone app when I p
78.
▲
by
nobody9999
6mo ago
>Hey Americans this might be a good time to do something about that lunatic you put into office. You're the ones constantly bleating on about keeping government power in check, don't you think this is an opportunity to put your
79.
▲
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
>Surely there's an option to unsubscribe from marketing emails. Did you try? It's highly illegal not to have that. IIRC, agreeing to receive marketing emails was one of the terms of installing the app which was required to
80.
▲
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
>Protip: always use plus aliases when signing up for things like this. Use a unique plus alias for everything you sign up for (the convention I use is e.g myemail+yourcompanyname@mydomain.com). This convention lets you be sure exactly wh
81.
▲
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
>Iga Swiatek (the tennis player) was denied entry in the player area for her own match. Situation was quickly resolved. >I doubt VIPs go through the same entrance, lines and checks as regular folks. For those of you unfamiliar with pr
82.
▲
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
>Each ticket is a unique code, and they are scanned on entry to match with the codes in the system. >As for resale: The attendee name is tied to the ticket in these cases, and ID is checked at the door. I guess an app could be more ef
83.
▲
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
>For sure. If that was true the answer would be "charge the non-app users a nominal fee to cover the cost". >Invasive tracking is the point, not the cost. It's anti-consumer. The last (and likely the last ) time I went
84.
▲
A New Linux Kernel Driver Wants to Catch Malicious USB Devices in the Act
(itsfoss.com)
4 points
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
|
0 comments
85.
▲
LIGO data hints at supernovae so powerful they leave nothing behind
(arstechnica.com)
6 points
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
|
0 comments
86.
▲
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
>And what happens if the state level election workers are up against federal level gunpoint? It's not like ICE can just roll into a state capitol and stop elections. How many folks would be required for that at each polling place ?
87.
▲
Internet Yiff Machine: We hacked 93GB of "anonymous" crime tips
(arstechnica.com)
2 points
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
|
0 comments
88.
▲
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
>You're putting words in my mouth. Are you sure you responded to the right comment? >don't see the point in continuing this conversation. Works for me.
89.
▲
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
>They were fragmented and smaller than the Aztec empire. So what? Portugal was smaller than the Aztec Empire too. As was the Netherlands. And England. Should we pooh pooh them as unimportant as well? https://en.wikipedia.o
90.
▲
Call between POLITICO journalist and EU official was intercepted and published
(politico.eu)
4 points
by
nobody9999
7mo ago
|
0 comments
More ›