nkozyra

56 ms·

931.
by nkozyra 5y ago
It looks a bit like Pinot Noir was already on a pretty clear upswing, could this not just be a correlation with trends in wine in general - dryer, less sweet/bodied reds? It would be interesting to see a comparison to whites - are Char
932.
by nkozyra 5y ago
> it just means it probably won't be indexed so I don't think that will do anything either Of course it would do something, it just wouldn't be the best way to do it. The goal is not to prevent Google from getting to that
933.
by nkozyra 5y ago
The article indicates they were asking for attribution in the form of an anchor tag. rel="noindex" has value, as would "UGC" Likewise the page would could have noindex as top level meta field. But I think you got what I
934.
by nkozyra 5y ago
What would the response be if you complied but added noindex nofollow to the IMG tag?
935.
by nkozyra 5y ago
To be fair, I referred to it as "similarly disliked." From a technical sense I'm less afraid of malicious plugins destroying my business like I might be with WP. My stance is if I'm doing X, my preference is to find soft
936.
by nkozyra 5y ago
From a technical sense there are plenty of alternatives, even similarly disliked platforms like medium or wix. The problem is none of them are interested in turning a basic CMS into a wasteland of kitchen sink functionality that aims to tur
937.
by nkozyra 5y ago
> So. On your own is just “VC’ed yourself” Well, yes. You're assuming the risk, not an external firm that in exchange demands a chunk of the company. In a truly bootstrapped company the risk is yours alone as is the potential reward
938.
by nkozyra 5y ago
It does, but so do interpreted languages and the many compiled languages with different compilation targets. It's less of a problem in 2021 than it was in 1995.
939.
by nkozyra 5y ago
> I find it hilarious that anyone imagines that subtitles are some kind of problem we are trying to get out of. I think there's a lot of gatekeeping about this. People - perhaps rightfully so - believe subtitled versions to be more
940.
by nkozyra 5y ago
> The default of you load it is dubbed, right? I don't think so, at least not for me.
941.
by nkozyra 5y ago
Oh I've used these plenty but there are still conditionals which sometimes require or are most clearly defined with if statements, particularly complex redirects that rely on a number of individual conditions to be met. I've seen
942.
by nkozyra 5y ago
> If you mean why not only use nginx Yes, this is what I meant. I originally wrote a SaaS app that was hosted through Apache and ended up putting NGINX on top of it for the aforementioned reasons. But eventually testing showed that remov
943.
by nkozyra 5y ago
> No, switching creates risks. Absolutely - but again, that's apparently not why NGINX was dismissed as an option.
944.
by nkozyra 5y ago
Again, we don't disagree. But the purported reason for rejection was the newness of Nginx.
945.
by nkozyra 5y ago
Well I think you and I are saying the same thing. Don't chase the shiny new thing. That said, by that time Nginx was a proven performance upgrade over Apache 1.x and 2.x. Quantifying that value is tough but it certainly had value attac
946.
by nkozyra 5y ago
By the mid 2010s it had definitely proved its mettle. Arguing that it wouldn't have provided enough benefit to justify the switch is different than saying it was unproven by that point.
947.
by nkozyra 5y ago
Granted I've done exactly this before, but why put Nginx in front of Apache? In my experience it added headaches without any real benefit. (Unless you don't mean Apache webserver but rather some other Apache product)
948.
by nkozyra 5y ago
> On the other hand, the unreadable weird-ass pseudo-XML configuration files If I have one gripe about NGINX it's that its configuration is a still-half-baked DSL that has quirks you wouldn't expect and when they error you don&
949.
by nkozyra 5y ago
I really take for granted how well Nginx works across a number of web backend functions. Some of the container/orchestration world has tried to supplant the need for it as a reverse proxy, but you get so many goodies out of the box jus
950.
by nkozyra 5y ago
> If you can't trust git to do this, how can you trust "cp" to make a copy of a file? I would love to get a genuine answer to my question: what do you think git is for and why do you use it? This would help me enormously t
951.
by nkozyra 5y ago
I think zigs documentation is wonderful and explains most seemingly esoteric syntax and language options really well. But if you hit a roadblock it's hard to track down more info. Some of that is due to the lack of adoption, though.
952.
by nkozyra 5y ago
This is so bad I refuse to believe it's inadvertent.
953.
by nkozyra 5y ago
This is annoying but it's not a huge hassle to duplicate/copy/rename, assuming your data is small and not sharded in some unique way
954.
by nkozyra 5y ago
Wouldn't you still need to be a paying Equifax customer to supply that?
955.
by nkozyra 5y ago
It's an extra ~1,400 deaths in the 15-18 age group.
956.
by nkozyra 5y ago
I noticed that if you do that they start injecting the same stuff into your profile notifications. They really want to feed you stuff you don't actually want.
957.
by nkozyra 5y ago
Not just cable, other streaming options including through Prime.
958.
by nkozyra 5y ago
The service itself and the way they handled existing accounts through other services. The plug was pulled rather abruptly
959.
by nkozyra 5y ago
What I meant by subsidizes is that it is the hook that allows the others to exist at a smaller profit margin.
960.
by nkozyra 5y ago
Disney+ is another example of this. Derided prior to launch in late 2019 as having missed the boat, it's a massive force now. Same with HBO Max, which added even more user hostile behavior, but ... they have their content so it's

More ›