nkozyra

5 ms·

31.
by nkozyra 4mo ago
Which is probably why they created another, for-profit, entity. You can argue that it's unlikely the for-profit conservatorship of the non-profit is incompatible with that goal, but legally that becomes very much grey area.
32.
by nkozyra 4mo ago
Well Twitter has other investors, too. But he'll also likely be shaving equity here and there along the way to hedge this bet.
33.
by nkozyra 4mo ago
A more "hardcore" team will keep telling him he can win on appeals, and bill accordingly.
34.
by nkozyra 5mo ago
I don't want to spoil it for you, but ...
35.
by nkozyra 6mo ago
Given all that, maybe we shouldn't have attacked. Doesn't seem like it really did anything.
36.
by nkozyra 6mo ago
The latter, their arrangement with OpenAI enabled this.
37.
by nkozyra 6mo ago
> If so, why do you think lobbying exists? Specifically because it's not a natural market. There are people who secure a 2-year, consequence-free term to impact U.S. law, at the behest of people with money. Lobbying is special inter
38.
by nkozyra 6mo ago
No offense intended here, but this probably isn't the place to promote your package, given it's a story about a massive and incredibly popular dependency that managed to get got.
39.
by nkozyra 6mo ago
Clever/novel ideas are very often subtle deviations from known, existing work. Sometimes just having the time/compute to explore the available space with known knowledge is enough to produce something unique.
40.
by nkozyra 6mo ago
CV is a space where I would 100% agree with you. But - edge cases notwithstanding - there's not so much of a dropoff with NER that I would first go to an LLM.
41.
by nkozyra 6mo ago
> f"Extract the company name from: {text}" I think one thing that's lost in all of the LLM tooling is that it's LLM-or-nothing and people have lost knowledge of other ML approaches that actually work just fine, like e
42.
by nkozyra 6mo ago
Not advocating for crypto here, but the ROI evaluations here are a bit incongruous. The risk of getting in early on crypto is you lose a little money. The risk of not is missing out on money. You can't simply replay that later, the way
43.
by nkozyra 7mo ago
The problem with evals is the underlying rubric will always be either subjective, or a quantitative score based on something that is likely now baked into the training set directly. You kind of have to go on "feels" for a lot of t
44.
by nkozyra 7mo ago
... at a massive company That's important. Cloudwall isn't really saying they have some secret sauce here, but it's noteworthy who they nabbed.
45.
by nkozyra 7mo ago
> The change here is that late night interviews are not "bona fied news" Not always the case with Section 315, and late night and talk shows have been exempted in the past. The problem here is that this is on a case-by-case bas
46.
by nkozyra 8mo ago
> DoJ explicitly avoids JPEG images in the PDFs probably because they appreciate that JPEGs often contain identifiable information, such as EXIF, IPTC, or XMP metadata Maybe I'm underestimating the issue at full, but isn't this
47.
by nkozyra 8mo ago
No, as I mentioned, full days in several cases, multiple 8+ hour outages. Keep in mind this is in response to "basically no downtime" If you told me Microsoft had "basically no downtime" I'd have the same reaction.
48.
by nkozyra 8mo ago
I didn't say that, so ... no?
49.
by nkozyra 8mo ago
> Twitter had basically no downtime since he bought it I'm sorry, but what? Not only has it had multiple half days of downtime, two full days+, but just two weeks ago had significant downtime. https://www.thebiglead.com&#
50.
by nkozyra 8mo ago
I think you may have misread my comment, because no.
51.
by nkozyra 8mo ago
I think there's a scenario where that's true: one where the head of your company is collaborative and deferential to expertise. There's another scenario, though: one where the head of your company is a bull in a China shop, w
52.
by nkozyra 8mo ago
That's an extraordinarily loose definition of "gave"
53.
by nkozyra 8mo ago
Expanding the market with alternatives that are now cheaper seems like an opportunity to save Canadians money.
54.
by nkozyra 9mo ago
1. Generate slop music nobody will ever listen to 2. ???? 3. Profit
55.
by nkozyra 10mo ago
Well Android is going to be the same way now, too.
56.
by nkozyra 11mo ago
I will accept the Chief Emergency Shutoff Activator Officer role; my required base comp is $25M. But believe me, nobody can trip over cables or run multiple microwaves simultaneously like I can.
57.
by nkozyra 11mo ago
> But I mean, you should be able to be an odd duck and also be a director of a brand, as long as you behaviour isn’t hurting anyone… I think the canonical example here is the Kirn Corksniffer[1] which could have been avoided with some fo
58.
by nkozyra 11mo ago
Having lived in both worlds, there are services wherein, yeah, host it yourself. But having done DB on-prem/on-metal, dedicated hosting, and cloud, databases are the one thing I'm happy to overpay for. The things you describe invo
59.
by nkozyra 1y ago
It would not be worth a try if not for a very legitimate reason. Being laid off and mounting a civil case against deep pockets doesn't sound like a recipe for success.
60.
by nkozyra 1y ago
> was always surprised someone didn't invent a tool for ftping to your container and updating the PHP. No FTP needed, you can just mount the application directory.

More ›