nkmnz

9 ms·

121.
by nkmnz 6mo ago
Israel’s setup is not perfect (and so is the one in Germany), but as long as you cannot show that there is any meaningful legal difference in the eye of the state between a couple that’s married (Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Druze) or in a Ci
122.
by nkmnz 6mo ago
Ideally, this is true: marriage = civil union + religion Of course everyone should be free to call their civil union whatever they like and the government shouldn’t differentiate at all if your civil union has a religious blessing as well.
123.
by nkmnz 6mo ago
They can. It’s called a civil union. Complaining about marriage laws in Israel in this uninformed way is just an antisemite dog whistle.
124.
by nkmnz 6mo ago
You might be surprised, but a civil union is the only legally binding form of marriage in many countries, e.g. Germany. The Churches - even though they are state churches - aren’t even allowed to provide a wedding ceremony if the civil unio
125.
by nkmnz 6mo ago
I agree that we should hold Israel to highest standards (which are, unfortunately, eroded especially by the US, these days). Nevertheless, you should always ask yourselves: would you prefer being an gay Arab in Tel Aviv or a gay Jew in Gaza
126.
by nkmnz 6mo ago
That’s a lie. You can form a civil union, which is very similar to the religious marriage. On the other hand, does Hamas recognise a Jewish marriage?
127.
by nkmnz 6mo ago
off topic: may I ask why and how this has been flagged? How does flagging work and why do I still see the post on the second or third page listed?
128.
by nkmnz 6mo ago
Well, 9 more months until I’m going to replace my iPhone 12!
129.
by nkmnz 6mo ago
A comment about how this could be achieved using rsync instead.
130.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
I don't think so. Most Germans would be okay with having the gold transferred to Canada or Switzerland or the UK.
131.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
Not true. Back then, limitations on "Spannungsfall" and "Verteidigungsfall" were in place which have been removed last year. The real news, though, is that the public (media, opposition parties) didn't noticed until
132.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
I don't understand what the point is you're trying to make. When people at t0 take detours because of traffic jams on the direct route, and then at t1, there are less traffic jam on the direct route due to additional lanes, so the
133.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
Citation needed. I've heard this quite often, but so far, I haven't seen proof of the stated causality. PS: This doesn't mean that better public transportation could deliver more bang for the buck than the n-th additional car
134.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
Thank you for the clarification. I agree that the current state of the art to show conflicts _in the same part of the code_ is not sufficient, so any improvement with regard to that is welcome. Still, I'm more looking for solutions wit
135.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
I don't quite understand how CRDTs should help with merges. The difficult thing about merges is not that two changes touch the same part of the code; the difficult thing is that two changes can touch different parts of the code and sti
136.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
"Teaching" in OPs context probably doesn't mean lecturing, but 1:1 sessions with Junior Researchers from Master's Thesis upwards to PhD Candidates and Postdocs.
137.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
>Power is essentially free when… This is not true, since you still need to pay for capex and depreciation. The reason it appears to be free is not because its production doesn’t cost anything, but because at times of a glut there‘s jus
138.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
Checks notes on carbondioxide emissions of Germany and France I think you’re wrong.
139.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
Of course. I cannot claim copyright on a poem that I have memorized as a child and written down as an adult. The original author can, though.
140.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
> AI-output does not qualify for IP protections I beg to differ. AI-output did not entitle the person creating the prompt for IP protections, so far – but my objection is not directed towards the "so far", but towards your omis
141.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
The burden of buffering the fluctuation is on those creating the fluctuation, not on those not doing so.
142.
by nkmnz 7mo ago
There's no technical need to do that, because someone who can always deliver electricity would be able to struck contracts with those that always need it, i.e. heavy industry, esp. aluminum and chemistry. The reason why downregulation
143.
by nkmnz 8mo ago
No, because OP implied that the AI generated content inherits the LICENSE: in their view, if the input has been GPL, The output must be GPL. So if the input hasn’t been licensed at all, the output cannot be licensed. The inheritance of „no
144.
by nkmnz 8mo ago
Is this true once you use a fancy filter of the photo app of your choice? Is this true once your phone applies such a filter without asking you? Should this be true for Theseus‘ Ship?
145.
by nkmnz 8mo ago
So we have two positions here: 1) LLMs are trained on non-licensed information, so anything coming out of them must be created without a license, so no one should be allowed to use it. 2) LKMs are trained on public information, so everyth
146.
by nkmnz 8mo ago
You get it wrong. Copyright is excluding you from using something, a license is allowing you to use something. So „no license“ does NOT mean „free to use“, but „not allowed to use“.
147.
by nkmnz 8mo ago
What about the code that wasn't even GPL, but "all rights reserved", i.e., without any license? That's even stronger than GPL and based on your reasoning, this would mean that any code created by an LLM is not licensed t
148.
by nkmnz 8mo ago
I did not refer to privacy rights. If you post a photo of yourselves online, you're giving up on a tiny part of your privacy rights. So my question still stands: would running your photos that you have taken of yourselves through a dif
149.
by nkmnz 8mo ago
So you’d lose all rights on pictures of yourselves if they were generated by AI? Would this be true even for nudes?
150.
by nkmnz 8mo ago
Don't worry, he works for the DoW.

More ›