Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
niutech
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
For a no-JS web browser, try also Dillo, it is very lightweight ad it has been recently updated.
32.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
Not only in Chrome, you can use Brave, Vivaldi based on Blink.
33.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
This was back in 2020 and they pardoned for it, it's time to give Brave another chance!
34.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
There are more: Epiphany (GNOME Web), Ultralight, Servo, Ladybird, Ekioh Flow.
35.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
Ungoogled Chromium doesn't include any tracking by Google and there are privacy-friendly Firefox forks: LibreWolf and Mullvad Browser.
36.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
> Does anyone believe a single big tech company isn’t harvesting data en masse from everyone in duplicitous manners? I believe SUSE, Red Hat don't harvest users data en masse.
37.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
> There has been no agreement on anything, no expectations or rules established. Yes, there has been one expectation: DNT (Do Not Track) header, sent with every request, which should be respected.
38.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
What's wrong with MD? Is parsing it more complicated than HTML? Why can't Dillo support rendering MD documents like it supports Gemini?
39.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
For GMaps alternative, there are Here WeGo or Bing Maps. For Android, there are Sailfish OS or Ubuntu Touch. For Chrome, there are Brave or Vivaldi (Blink-based). Google is not irreplaceable.
40.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
E.g. Vivaldi is Chromium-based but doesn't include Nano Banana.
41.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
But Edge, Brave or Vivaldi are based on the same Chromium engine as Chrome.
42.
▲
by
niutech
5mo ago
Serious question: why do you use Google Chrome in the first place, when there are better alternatives, e.g. Brave (crypto stuff could be easily disabled) or Vivaldi, both with adblocker?
43.
▲
by
niutech
8mo ago
There are already: Matrix, Jabber, Mumble, Zulip - all open source.
44.
▲
by
niutech
8mo ago
Discourse, Matrix, Zulip, Rocket.chat - all open source.
45.
▲
by
niutech
8mo ago
Freeloading? Bad word. There are plenty of free/open source alternatives like Discourse, Zulip, Matrix, so why would anybody pay for something which should be free to use and respect user privacy?
46.
▲
by
niutech
8mo ago
No, Discord/Slack is a mess. Interesting topics got buried in an IRC-style chat. Threaded BBS are much better for organizing communities, like Discourse. And it is open source, so no vendor lock-in with stupid age verification.
47.
▲
by
niutech
9mo ago
What's the difference if Apple gets $20B from Google and spends $1B to another company or just gets $19B from Google and doesn't spend nothing?
48.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
Llamafile ( https://llamafile.ai ) can easily exceed 4GB due to containing LLM weights inside. But remember, you cannot run >4GB executable files on Windows.
49.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
> I doubt it’ll be radically different from other implementations of AI + Browser in such a way that it stands above the others. Mozilla distinguishes itself by allowing to use any AI, including open source private, local LLMs in their
50.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
Why not generate good old RTF files instead of PDF? They are much simpler and support more than ASCII charset.
51.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
How about comparing with Duktape ( https://duktape.org )?
52.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
There are still Espruino JS devices.
53.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
And also Duktape ( https://duktape.org )
54.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
Tauri also targets the lightweight Servo engine, so you don't need to budle a bloated CEF.
55.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
Why noy use Flatpak instead of AppImage then?
56.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
But Win32 API is stable, I can run Windows 95 apps in Windows 11!
57.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
There are even more lightweight alternatives for Electron than Tauri: NodeGui, Neutralino.js, Sciter, DeskGap and more: https://github.com/sudhakar3697/awesome-electron-alternative...
58.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
SO comment: > The formal definition (simplest) of Turing Machine is simply a tuple of states set, symbol set, initial state, accepting states set and a transition function. There is no crank in it. By computation we mean somebody needs t
59.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
CSS is already a programming language long before if() function. You can even emulate CPU in it: https://dev.to/janeori/expert-css-the-cpu-hack-4ddj
60.
▲
by
niutech
10mo ago
Becoming? CSS is already Turing-complete ( https://stackoverflow.com/a/5239256 ), even without if() function. Why? Because of enormous JS bloat. Pure CSS solutions are more performant and backwards-compatible (don't
More ›