ninetyninenine

60 ms·

1. 841.▲
   by ninetyninenine 1y ago

   Is there a pattern or animation you can manually animate on those dots that can’t be represented by an equation?
2. 842.▲
   by ninetyninenine 1y ago

   I literally wrote it above and you didn’t read. It’s a user interface issue, Let me copy it here: But think about it. If you have a deeply nested Object where you don't use inheritance. Then all the objects have multitudes of redundant
3. 843.▲
   by ninetyninenine 1y ago

   >I'm curious if you'll still back the argument you've made here after you've been programming for 30 years too. You're clearly already suspicious of how and why inheritance makes code harder to understand. I susp
4. 844.▲
   by ninetyninenine 1y ago

   >By merging them. Structs are product types. If you merge them, you get a bigger product type. You don't need inheritance (ADTs) for that. Merging structs and inheritance are fundamentally the same thing. >How fundamental is inhe
5. 845.▲
   by ninetyninenine 1y ago

   I’m not gonna read the full thing. I’m just responding to the first part. Composes or inheritance is just vocabulary for two things that are the same with slight differences. Composes duplicates identical properties via nesting. Inheritance
6. 846.▲
   by ninetyninenine 1y ago

   I have: A = {a, b, c, d, e} I want to write: B = {a, b, c, d, e, f, g} But I don't want to write duplicate code So I write: B = B(A) = {A, e, f, g} aka I use inheritance. Are there easier ways? No. Inheritance is the mo
7. 847.▲
   by ninetyninenine 1y ago

   >Why would we assume that? If the objects are entirely distinct, why are you combining them together into one class at all? That doesn't make any sense. Let distinct types be distinct. Let consumers of those types combine them howev
8. 848.▲
   by ninetyninenine 1y ago

   fundamental truth of things is probably the wrong word choice. It's more like there are many fundamental concepts and trees are one such concept. I don't think there is a singular fundamental truth of things. >Even if you want
9. 849.▲
   by ninetyninenine 1y ago

   evolution is a tree. Follow the ancestral lines. Even the term inheritance comes from evolution.
10. 850.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    > a tree probably doesn't represent the fundamental truth of things It does. Trees appear in nature all the time. It's the basis of human society, evolution and many things. Most of programming moves towards practicality rather
11. 851.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    >What? Using multiple inheritence? You just threw this in out of nowhere. I didn't mention anything about "multiple" inheritance. Just inheritance which by default people usually mean single inheritance. That being said mu
12. 852.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    It is a good idea because it's the most fundamental idea. You have two objects. A and B. How do you merge the two objects? A + B? The most straight forward way is inheritance. The idea is fundamental. The reason why it's not pract
13. 853.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    Of course any tool that makes a job easier means that less people are needed to do the same job. If demand doesn’t change the supply will naturally shrink. So hypothetically 1 man can cut wood but it takes him 2 days to do a big job. With a
14. 854.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    The LLM provided an answer that has superior quality or equal quality to a human. Then instead of judging the statement rationally on this quality we decided to judge the question on whether or not it was AI. This is the same irrationality
15. 855.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    This is beginnings of AI discrimination. If an answer is written by an LLM but equal or superior in quality to a human answer why question or disparage it? I don't know but it looks like you're probably a white guy. Your mannerism
16. 856.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    Yes. That's the problem. You think the answer is no, but the answer is actually yes.
17. 857.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    I feel jetbrains is squandering an opportunity here. Cursor is significantly easier to build then any IDE in the jetbrains ecosystem. The technology jetbrains is very hard to replicate. While the technology cursor uses should be trivial to
18. 858.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    Clippy was ahead of it's time. We all had no idea.
19. 859.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    You can still day dream when you drive. Long drives to work especially are good for this. Just make sure you don’t kill anybody.
20. 860.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    No this is just a very overly pedantic and technical way of looking at it. First of all you'll note that all people are also biased by the Exact same reasoning. You know this. Everyone knows that all people are biased. This isn't
21. 861.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    That's only if the police know. If they don't know what I did to get that blood then I won't get caught.
22. 862.▲
    by ninetyninenine 1y ago

    I'm surprised they were able to come up with potential purpose for this study. Very creative. I have another purpose: art.
23. 863.▲
    by ninetyninenine 2y ago

    Also pay them less, because they don’t need to be as skilled anymore since ai is covering it.
24. 864.▲
    by ninetyninenine 2y ago

    This eye will be a driving force for improving ai until it becomes in parity with real non generated pictures.
25. 865.▲
    by ninetyninenine 2y ago

    Until we solve the hallucination problem google search still has a place of power as something that doesn’t hallucinate. And even if we solve this problem of hallucination, the ai agents still need a platform to do search. If I was Google I
26. 866.▲
    by ninetyninenine 2y ago

    I find it easily hallucinates this stuff. It’s understanding of a picture is decidedly worse then its understanding of words. Be careful here about asking if it needs a tire change it is likely giving you an answer that only looks real.
27. 867.▲
    by ninetyninenine 2y ago

    According to the article the Tax expert still has a job though.
28. 868.▲
    by ninetyninenine 2y ago

    China. The country dominates the US in many many ways because of centralized decision making.
29. 869.▲
    by ninetyninenine 2y ago

    yep. Same principle. Totally agreed. The irony is that we feel we can make more claims about LLMs because we created LLMs. We created something that we don't understand.
30. 870.▲
    by ninetyninenine 2y ago

    Can he prove what he says? The foundation of his argument rests on hand waves and vague definitions on what a mind is and what a theory is that it ultimately goes nowhere. Then he makes a claim and doesn’t back it up. I have a new concept f