Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nilslindemann
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
nilslindemann
7mo ago
They are all anachronisms, as they have no GUIs, just commands to be typed into a REPL.
62.
▲
by
nilslindemann
7mo ago
Yes, how is Proton a US controlled company? At least in the German Wikipedia they sound like a group of saints.
63.
▲
by
nilslindemann
7mo ago
1. More title attributes please ("S 16 A 7 B 7 C 0 D 4 F 34", huh?) 2. Add a 150% size bonus to your site. Otherwise, cool site, bookmarked.
64.
▲
by
nilslindemann
7mo ago
Has the "Gargantua Wasps" theory already been ruled out?
65.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
You are misreading him there. Read the thread again.
66.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
This will only be an ethical tool when everyone is honest about the fact that an AI is moderating, and people can reedit their posts. If you give admins the option to disable reediting, in order to hide that an AI is controlling, then they
67.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
Correct you are.
68.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
AFAIK, what this dude did - running a script which tries every password and actually accessing personal data of other people – is illegal in Germany. The reasoning is, just because a door of a car which is not yours is open you have no righ
69.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
It is also not extraordinary to do that. I have achieved these results around 2015, sitting at home, relaxed. I was not in a match situation observed by millions. Such a situation can knowingly lead to blunders like Kramniks overlook of mat
70.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
It is called Placement chess, you can play it on PyChess. [1] As far as I know no tournament ever used this rule. [1] https://www.pychess.org/variants/placement
71.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
Ah okay.
72.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
A fair match has never been played between humans and computers. Let's say we have a fair match: * 100 games, to have some statistical relevance. * One move per day, so that being tired is no disadvantage (engine can ponder a
73.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
Well, there is nothing I can do to prove to you that I did, as I can not travel into the past taking you with me. I know, I did win two or three games and drew approximately 25 out of approximately 500 training games. But I can not prove it
74.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
The only bet I would take is that I can draw against Stockfish. But I am in general not betting. I also don't have the time currently.
75.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
Why can you use CSS conventions in only one project?
76.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
@josephg (for reasons I do not know there is no reply link below your post) Sure, some people are cheaters. Some are not. There is no personal win in cheating against Stockfish. Usually strong players do it for training purposes, or to ente
77.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
Just because you can not do it it does not mean that others can not do it. If you search for Lichess games where strong players play against (edit: strongest!) Stockfish (which, admittedly is not the full throttle Stockfish) you will find t
78.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
I do not know the time controls anymore, but I always use the latest Stockfish with all available threads. No opening book, but I do not repeat lines to take advantage of that, because I play to train calculation. I guess hash was the (for
79.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
Yeah. There is no need to obfuscate your code, just use Tailwind.
80.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
My favorite is @layer
81.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
Further, if the engine does not use an opening database and the thinking time per game is the same, then the engine will usually make the same moves, so you can learn from your errors. There are just a few chess engines which "learn&qu
82.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
Like my answer below, that's wrong. Even I have achieved a few draws or even wins against Stockfish in training games, and I am FM strength. From time to time you are happy to reach a simple rook endgame which happens to be won and the
83.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
This is most definitely wrong. There will be some draws and even a few wins, though that's very rare indeed.
84.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
> Magnus' time will come! But not today. Hasn't Magnus' time already come, and isn't it still Magnus' time? He is #1 on all three lists[1] and so long that I have forgotten when he was not. [1]: https:/
85.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
It is not freestyle, it is "play a random position chosen by an algorithm" style. This is boring. Let the players freely place their pieces in the start position, that would be of interest.
86.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
Like Lasker, Carlsen will still play with 60+.
87.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
There are so many different views of the same concept.
88.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
This is also interesting regarding to how we treat animals. If a man can live like a normal human using just 10% of his brain, then it may be possible that an animal with a small brain may be much smarter than we thought, because it uses it
89.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
The correct translation is that Google only wants the Google PKI and not the Everything PKI.
90.
▲
by
nilslindemann
8mo ago
Or, we could organize a basic income.
More ›