nijave

6 ms·

61.
by nijave 2mo ago
I would think there has to be some decent middle ground like storing some structures on disk mmap'd and letting the kernel handle back pressure and caching
62.
by nijave 2mo ago
>that is due to the publisher and copyright laws Agree. While it certainly isn't the most environmentally friendly to render huge stacks of paper into waste, the real issue is copyright creating scarcity (inability to copy the thing
63.
by nijave 2mo ago
>Why not just use that other vendor's model for everything? On the SMB side, you can find yourself with enough money for a Claude subscription (which generally provides a really good $/token value) but limited other options (co
64.
by nijave 2mo ago
This is the crux. Capitalism doesn't work here and a fair bit of people like to pretend it does. Then there's the people who bemoan "paying for someone else's healthcare" while completely ignoring that's what t
65.
by nijave 2mo ago
I'm skeptical. It will be cheaper to hire a couple security guards and buy a couple armoured cars then turn away profits. The reaction was short lived while the insurance companies figured out how to bolster security and return to the
66.
by nijave 2mo ago
Currently using exa/searxng/scrapling with pretty good success. Has anyone compared these to agent research?
67.
by nijave 2mo ago
It has real business value. Letting non technical users run wild without the onerous layers of controls in traditional enterprise IT. We're already contending with users wanting to hook up every SaaS MCP to every other SaaS platform an
68.
by nijave 2mo ago
>This doesn't work in the cloud Software-as-a-Service model, because you are not running your own copy of the app. Let me introduce you to scrapling+MCP--the closest I've come. Stealthed, controllable browser gives you an API t
69.
by nijave 2mo ago
n8n will do that
70.
by nijave 2mo ago
I think you tend to need both. There's certain deterministic data and steps that surround the agent as well as certain agentic steps where the LLM is controlling the execution flow. n8n had an LLM step, not sure if they had an "ag
71.
by nijave 2mo ago
There's an env var you can set to tell it when to compact. It's especially helpful for models with big context that lose coherence much earlier.
72.
by nijave 2mo ago
On Claude Code you can run /context and it'll explain everything
73.
by nijave 2mo ago
How do you ensure your SQL queries (either raw or ORM generated) retrieve the correct data? A lot of business apps are mostly SQL with a thin layer of glue to integrate everything. I think it depends on what the app does--is it data manipul
74.
by nijave 2mo ago
Django has built in support for templates https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/6.0/ref/databases/#test-da... I thought it had a way to do concurrent sharded tests on the same database instance by automatica
75.
by nijave 2mo ago
To add to what the other person said, they're also loaded differently than arbitrary docs. They're presented as a list of titles and descriptions to the LLM and it can pick which ones seem relevant and load them. Markdown docs the
76.
by nijave 2mo ago
If there's 1 developer working on 1 branch at a time: main is at commit A, you branch add B and C, you merge now main is at A, B, C. Your "integration" was just moving the code forward and if you ran tests on A, B, C commits
77.
by nijave 2mo ago
Opportunity cost
78.
by nijave 2mo ago
If you can modify role IAM, I'd start with SSM Parameter Store + KMS encryption for secret values. That is generally much cheaper since typical use fits in the free tier. They also recently added resource policies to parameters but I d
79.
by nijave 2mo ago
>Can't you run your CI locally? If you mean automated tests and linters, sure. Conceptually continuous integration is generally integrating 2+ different lineages of code together which is more common with multiple developers althoug
80.
by nijave 2mo ago
>So, if software knows in advance which data chunk (expert) it'll need for the next token, it can load that in parallel with computing current token. Yeah, I was thinking MADV_WILLNEED might work there but not sure
81.
by nijave 2mo ago
Iirc there are no release tags, they build off the tip of the branch Actually it's their zmk fork, not qmk https://github.com/Keychron/zmk/tree/rtl8762g
82.
by nijave 3mo ago
Any idea if madvise helps? Admittedly I have very limited experience and only on Linux
83.
by nijave 3mo ago
Hopefully better than their QMK fork. They force push over their branch in their fork each new release effectively erasing history of the last version... Of course there's no change log anywhere either...
84.
by nijave 3mo ago
>does this mean Microsoft's model is best at fixing Microsoft products In theory, they have tons of network-type data and at least some Linux data from Azure. In practice... Good question... Identity is somewhat standard-ish LDAP&#x
85.
by nijave 3mo ago
I should have mentioned Claude Code, specifically. It sounds like other harnesses are better. I'm a bit entrenched with CC at this point since that's what we have a subscription to at work and they don't support other harness
86.
by nijave 3mo ago
Forgot about the ol "but how many tokens did you spend to get _there_"--wish benchmarks would include the number of input/output tokens to achieve the score. I think the closest is Android Bench https://developer.a
87.
by nijave 3mo ago
Anthropic has an outage nearly everyday. GitHub seems like they're down to about once a month again
88.
by nijave 3mo ago
I wish the harnesses would auto resume but I suppose that would also add more load without more money for subscription customers...
89.
by nijave 3mo ago
1000ms / 12 = 83ms per request which sounds normal
90.
by nijave 3mo ago
I think on swebench verified luna was only like 3% points lower for 1/5 the cost Like 96% vs 93% or something

More ›