nijave

11 ms·

271.
by nijave 5mo ago
In fairness, any secrets in your .env file in your development tree shouldn't have very important secrets. They should be limited access dev secrets and any secrets that go to "production" systems like an OpenAI dev environme
272.
by nijave 5mo ago
Yeah, I've had Claude read a dev key before by accident and it even stopped, said it read a key, and told me to rotate it immediately. Assuredly it's not fool proof but it does have safeguards in place. Ideally you also opt out of
273.
by nijave 5mo ago
Google/Gemini has pretty impressive audio visual capabilities. I tried to have Claude add mulch to a landscape picture and it looked like someone hit it with the orange spray paint tool in MS Paint. Nano Banana actually produced someth
274.
by nijave 5mo ago
Given their proclivity to scrape the entire contents of the internet, it's only a matter of time intentional or otherwise. I've heard the same has happened with common benchmarks (they've ingested solutions into training data
275.
by nijave 5mo ago
I think it's just further exposed cracks in software engineering that were always there. Ideally we'll come out of the AI hype cycle having learned better practices.
276.
by nijave 5mo ago
I'd say closer to 6 months for me but probably still some room to improve. I think getting a decent setup with a fast feedback loop for the agent combined with context (in repo markdown)+memories goes a long way. After having Claude Co
277.
by nijave 5mo ago
Have had fairly good luck with Claude Code Opus 4.7 on xhigh effort. I think it more reliably does IaC with established patterns especially when it can do a dry run. Python is pretty decent but usually you need good prompting and a little b
278.
by nijave 5mo ago
How did it cost you money in grant work? Can't you just fork and use that?
279.
by nijave 5mo ago
Claude subscription is restricted to Claude Code harness Really walled garden is the only direction that makes sense--models will slowly become commodities
280.
by nijave 5mo ago
Claude Code with Opus 4.7 xhigh effort Datadog + Python with a little AWS It does better at writing code but diagnosing bugs and performance issues is a bit of a crapshoot. It's decent at diagnosing but when tasked with improving perfo
281.
by nijave 5mo ago
Back when I used Windows I prided myself in my install age. Can't remember if I started on XP but at least made it from 7, 8, 8.1, to 10 over many years, repairing issues as they came up. DISM largely does the same thing as reinstall w
282.
by nijave 5mo ago
>Meanwhile on Linux you can peek inside the process that's hanging and see what it's borked on. Windows has pretty robust tooling to do the same, even if no one uses it. Process Monitor (procmon) will trivially tell you the sam
283.
by nijave 5mo ago
I give it passwordless sudo but don't give it permissions to automatically run commands. I just review what it's running before accepting. If it looks questionable, I interrupt and ask it to explain what/why it wants to run t
284.
by nijave 5mo ago
If you're like me and never use the Gnome/KDE shortcuts, just disable/switch those
285.
by nijave 5mo ago
I've had similar issues with Linux. Usually it's either put up with things breaking in mainline but use latest hardware or sit on LTS on older hardware with better stability. Windows Performance Analyser and Windows Performance Re
286.
by nijave 5mo ago
They killed OSS incident management Given a lot of their software is OSS or OSS based there's a probable chance non-OSS is runnable and usable outside the company The product is mostly "standalone" in that it doesn't req
287.
by nijave 5mo ago
In 2026, I remain hopeful AGENTS.md can help close that gap
288.
by nijave 5mo ago
Any idea on timing? I was under the impression pretty much anything RDS takes ~20 minutes although I haven't done any benchmarking/timing on the latest Aurora stuff Main exceptions are copying/encrypting snapshots when they&#
289.
by nijave 5mo ago
>Your company becomes reliant on another party that does not share your interests or values, and can stop working for you on a whim for any reason That's the same as human workers. In both cases there are contracts/money to hel
290.
by nijave 5mo ago
>within a few years Eventually, we'll see. Frontier models still need some pretty serious hardware which will slowly come down in cost. Smaller models are becoming more capable, which will presumably continue to improve. I think the
291.
by nijave 5mo ago
>No, the code is actually almost always correct That's not my experience, especially when the inputs are bugs or performance issues. It frequently hallucinates and misdiagnosis without a guiding hand. However, it can still RCA and a
292.
by nijave 5mo ago
While I agree with the article, I think AI can speed up all steps in the Gantt chart. It's really good about aggregating and summarizing information. >Process blocked on human inputs Have AI check chat, email, issue tracker and see
293.
by nijave 5mo ago
A little slow but on Aurora you can attach then promote read replicas. Iirc that's around 20 minutes but I haven't tested recently. I'd think you could also setup logical rep to a VM then snapshot and clone the storage which
294.
by nijave 5mo ago
Where do review comments go? What if changes are needed?
295.
by nijave 5mo ago
Issue tracker, code reviews
296.
by nijave 5mo ago
Nothing like waiting 20 minutes for a test suite that should have taken 2
297.
by nijave 5mo ago
I tried that with Bedrock but Claude models are billed through Marketplace and generate a completely separate invoice. Suspect this is probably the same.
298.
by nijave 5mo ago
Ironically that's the only AI feature they need, making it less slow
299.
by nijave 5mo ago
Atlassian Bitbucket
300.
by nijave 5mo ago
Oh the irony. It was just last week I was lamenting Gitlab's lack of AI support. Best I could tell, Gitlab's solution to AI hitting servers is "block it with Anubis"

More ›