Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nighthawk648
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
nighthawk648
7y ago
I think this is the largest necessity for those truly invested in a truly random performing system. The truly random system can also provide more sophisticated simulation / effects of said simulation. Think of trying to programmaticall
62.
▲
by
nighthawk648
7y ago
What is your opinion of the swagger spec + definition?
63.
▲
by
nighthawk648
7y ago
> to reduce the incidence of death/injury ... Or you know large scale existential crisis. Nanotechnology is freaky man. Could be the easiest way for reality to be rewritten without anyone noticing..
64.
▲
by
nighthawk648
7y ago
Btw, jpmorgan dev team is rediculous because support is so massive the only way new projects get done is by hiring massive amounts of people / consultant firms and then lay offs. Not saying there is a problem, I’m sure some people like
65.
▲
by
nighthawk648
7y ago
Sorry couldn’t respond due to fault segmentation.
66.
▲
by
nighthawk648
7y ago
The main reason I get so curious as to why so many developers would rather use premade packages then spend r&d into highly optimized solutions.
67.
▲
by
nighthawk648
7y ago
How stable is python to run a full trading / quantitative algorithm on? I feel there are benefits for every language. I am just curious if super stable and scalable conditions can be met on python.
68.
▲
by
nighthawk648
7y ago
Exactly. The project can be done by a small dedicated team though. Many teams require support past development life cycle, so I could see a small team upgrading and passing support back to the original product owners. It seems the politics