nielsbot

110 ms·

1921.
by nielsbot 12y ago
"minimalist"
1922.
by nielsbot 12y ago
Well, classically at least, the + button should enlarge the window to the largest size that fits the content... Hence no Windows-style maximize feature.
1923.
by nielsbot 13y ago
sorry to see it go. USPS should have bought it or integrated it (but I saw the blog post about them saying "we'll never do that") Hell, I would have still paid for the service for the archiving and online filing part even if
1924.
by nielsbot 13y ago
...so you haven't actually read the paper
1925.
by nielsbot 13y ago
Are you saying you'd rather write apps in C++? I don't think the tradeoff is worth it.
1926.
by nielsbot 13y ago
I thought sapphire was much more brittle than glass, so more prone to shattering. Does someone here know if that's true? Would it be a problem for iPhone/iPad sized pieces?
1927.
by nielsbot 13y ago
I've used this to track down my scrolling performance problems in the past, although it's been a while: https://github.com/nielsbot/Profiler (yes, I'm plugging my own code :-)
1928.
by nielsbot 13y ago
that can work depending on how many images you have... Note also that there's a decompression hit loading PNG too.
1929.
by nielsbot 13y ago
I think it can change from device to device too
1930.
by nielsbot 13y ago
If you know how to use retain/release, then you shouldn't have any trouble dealing with ARC edge cases... go ARC!
1931.
by nielsbot 13y ago
It might even be faster under ARC since I think the compiler can optimize some retain/release calls. I think the ARC retain and release may be faster than -retain/-release, but I'm not sure about that. Overall, yes, it's
1932.
by nielsbot 14y ago
You don't have to use it...
1933.
by nielsbot 14y ago
Really? Maybe for a merchant on Starbuck's level, but for small merchants, cc processors definitely charge more than 2.75%. Even if you get a lower percentage rate (impossible) you get charged 0.05 or more per transaction , plus a monthl
1934.
by nielsbot 15y ago
downtown Chicago is lots of fun