Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nickik
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
107 ms
·
961.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Doing the landing swing move and then stopping the swing with the rocket engine seems dicey to me. The timing on those firings need to be incredibly accurate.
962.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Suns should really have taken that market. People were using workstations of on routers already. The were perfect positioned to get into it. Scott McNealy called it one of their biggest failures. Their slogan was literally 'The Network
963.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
This is by far the biggest reason I don't buy these.
964.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
We know about how much investment was made in SpaceX. And the idea that SpaceX has for 10+ years sold launches as loss leader simply doesn't add up. The opposite is more likely, they were profitable already for years and then the made
965.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
By no definition is Starship a paper rocket. Either you have not been paying attention or you don't know what the definition of a paper rocket is. > small fairing space and Its not actually small. Its a little smaller then the bigge
966.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
It depends on what definition of inflation/deflation you use. Some people, Austrians define any change in the amount of base currency as inflation/deflation. This is the traditional definition. However the normal everyday usage of
967.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
A government can do a lot of things, and if you have Mao in command. However, if you want to have a somewhat modern society taking away basic things like internet and power is very difficult. You can maybe to that for some individuals, but
968.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
It has nothing to do, absolutely nothing, with non-Keynsian history of money. Keynes didn't even write about history of money. Keynes in is book even assumed the gold standard for the most part anyway. As somebody who studies history o
969.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
As with every Musk project, industry expert come out and claim that all they do is subsidies their product with investor money, there is no way it could be so cheap. The expert here is actually somebody from a competitor company. Not convin
970.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Because MIPS was proprietary and it could never be more then a toy.
971.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Yes, just the best tool for the job and its not hydrogen. Yes, hydrogen production can potentially improve. Of course, it can, if we invest infinity money into it everything can improve. The question is with limited resources make choices a
972.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
The issue with storage is being addressed and being fixed rapidly with battery and other technologies while hydrogen has been promised and invested in by governments for 50 years with very little results. Some technologies with far more pro
973.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
No. Green hydrogen might have some application, specially in creating some other greenly produced chemicals. But in terms of transportation, heating and grid storage its not the right solution. The price is still incredibly high so far we h
974.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
I have made the argument, just not in response to you.
975.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Are you time traveler from 2016? Literally everything you say is simply wrong.
976.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
They don't actually need that much to justify their valuation. Go look at some of the bull cases by analysts. Some of them have a stock price in this range and their targets for Tesla are 5-10x below what Tesla targets in the next 10 y
977.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Or maybe you are just wrong on your evaluation and it has nothing to do with the market being irrational.
978.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Much more then thousands, WAY more. Somebody else in this thread says: > there are 608 million farms in the world
979.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Bitcoin is not a replacement for banks.
980.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
> therefore affects the velocity of money in the network That is very questionable.
981.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Nuclear can and will work with far fewer rules and fix cost once you next generation reactors with totally different operational safety requirements. We are literally stuck with 50 year old technology in nuclear energy, as unfortunately pro
982.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
You are still making the same mistake. > There are a few of them because wealth concentrates upwards. Is your argument really that all wealth is already owned by some dynastic elite and that's why nobody else can get to that level?
983.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Selection bias at work
984.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Its not always the code you work on. It might be other internal services or sites.
985.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
Do you think the non-developed world only consists of dirt poor peasants? There are lots of people in these countries who this service would help. What you also seem to ignore is that many business in these countries would be helped by this
986.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
It depends on two things currently: - Ground station - SpaceX allowing you access from that location Some beta testers have moved around their antennas and they worked even when not at the 'official' location. So currently it 
987.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
The problem will not be the spectrum, the sats will likely be the bottle neck. The amount of users can scale with the amount of sats you have. You will hopefully get a better signal by having many sats in your view and the ability for the n
988.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
You can't really take your personal antenna in a train. The train provider would have to do this for now. On a personal boat this is less of an issue, but for most large boats the operate would install it and then offer local WLAN I wo
989.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
The problem is that the main business of SpaceX and Arianespace was GEO sats. Those have been in a slump and fewer launches existed. Maybe that will pick back up, but the largest part of that were for Internet and after that TV, both don&#x
990.
▲
by
nickik
6y ago
No it not when it is 'inevitable' its when an alternative becomes more viable. > The problem is not technological, it never was, but a matter of priorities. The growth of humanity from 100M to 10B was 100% based on technology
More ›