nickburns

14 ms·

1. 271.▲
   by nickburns 2y ago

   Verification link sent to registrant's email address. Change not processed until verification occurs. This is generally the level of diligence (i.e. emailed verification link) that registrars are held to. DNS providers should be held t
2. 272.▲
   by nickburns 2y ago

   > I have written up a fairly hefty dictionary of words they mispronounce or even just invent on their own because they don't know the one in their native tongue. Ah, beautiful little displays of an attempt to understand, not merel
3. 273.▲
   by nickburns 2y ago

   > A young child has basically nothing but figuring out what's going around him Right—not simply memorizing what's happening around them. Those are fundamentally different activies. That is the gist of the parent comment&#
4. 274.▲
   by nickburns 2y ago

   It's even more insulting than a fine. It's a voluntary payment in settlement that admits no liability or wrongdoing.
5. 275.▲
   by nickburns 2y ago

   I actually do find this observation to be quite accurate for many of my own 'suggestions.' I'm regularly recommended 'new' and 'old' music that was clearly matched to my 'tastes' only by melody o
6. 276.▲
   by nickburns 2y ago

   I shall have a rest on this bench in honor of your friend if I'm ever in Astoria Park.
7. 277.▲
   by nickburns 2y ago

   ah. was confused by the timestamping on my end (i.e. 41080654 shows just '2 hours ago' and 41086952 shows '7 hours ago'). must be some other inner-workings. but thanks for pointing out IDs to me for future reference.
8. 278.▲
   by nickburns 2y ago

   dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41086952
9. 279.▲
   by nickburns 2y ago

   Good day, ladies and gentlemen. This is your, uh, captain (obvious) speaking. It, uh, couldn't be any clearer here, based on all the circumstances, that, uh—these pilots truly believed they had the runway in sight when it was, in fact,
10. 280.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    I truly did not mean to come off as rude. The 'content of the QR code' would've revealed the actual seed and so would corroborate your assumption if you did, in fact, verify as much. I merey stated a troubleshooting fact. No
11. 281.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    You assume that because you were not able to overcome whatever error/s you encountered with Google Auth and Authy, that you were being forced to use MS Authenticator.
12. 282.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    that's a nice thing to have.
13. 283.▲
    Former Boeing inspector alleges 'scrap' parts ended up on assembly lines(cnn.com)

    3 points by nickburns 2y ago|0 comments
14. 284.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    > I ended up losing nearly 15 years of my Google Location history genuinely curious—why would you want this?
15. 285.▲
    Extremes on Earth(en.wikipedia.org)

    2 points by nickburns 2y ago|0 comments
16. 286.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    love how you doubled down on spouting nonsense with your edit.
17. 287.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    that's quite literally an oxymoronic statement.
18. 288.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    "Scientists believe its disappearance makes Venezuela the first country in the Americas — and the first country in modern history — to lose all its glaciers [emphasis added]." Title inaccurate. This goes well beyond only 'A
19. 289.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    > These are terrible points! Asserting that a special prosecutor is akin to a private prosecutor is absurd. what, pray tell, is a "private prosecutor"?
20. 290.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    my question being rhetorical and all, i already knew you couldn't.
21. 291.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    > Just to let you know that he (like the rest of us) have already read it. exceedingly doubtful.
22. 292.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    > I have already read the opinion and came into the same conclusion i sincerely doubt that.
23. 293.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    can you find any comments anywhere here which seem to support " mobs attacking the Capitol or "find me some votes" or minority rule or massive roundups and detention camps or any of that"?
24. 294.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    i'm a little busy cutting through the actual opinion at the moment. maaaybe i'll get to this Vox journalist's own interpretation of it when i'm done. no breath should be held though.
25. 295.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    clearly you have a hard time distinguishing between who supports what.
26. 296.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    > major, major events okay, buddy. we get it. you're excited and it's making you sound Trumpian.
27. 297.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    what a dramatic take. surely you haven't read the actual opinion. for posterity, this is "the blueprint for a [sic] American dictatorship" to which you refer: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf&#
28. 298.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    Only a psychopath would read the actual transcript.
29. 299.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    > allow claimants to pierce the corporate veil and go after the family directly. This decision is a win both for that cause, and also forestalling precedent that would allow future wrongdoing corporations from 'shielding the veil&#x
30. 300.▲
    by nickburns 2y ago

    You do not have to sign up for anything. SCOTUS opinions are freely-accessible public record.[0] [0] https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/opinions.aspx