neya

6 ms·

121.
by neya 5mo ago
> No one is doing that, these people don't exist. "I don't personally know enough people doing what a mega-corporation with a massive market research team with multiple layers of market research audits has concluded people
122.
by neya 5mo ago
We are going to be seeing a lot of these moving forward. It's the easy way out. If you've worked with Google, you will know that it's an environment where accountability doesn't thrive. You will find people who know noth
123.
by neya 5mo ago
> It's additional software that many users didn't ask for, don't want and will not be aware of You mean like Siri? It does the exact same thing and no one asked for it, either. That shit barely works too.
124.
by neya 5mo ago
What you are describing is a the role of a manager, not a software engineer. Software engineering has very little to do with writing code, but more on architecting at the higher level on what needs to be done. The code is just the execution
125.
by neya 5mo ago
> People who don't pair caffeine with nicotine simply have no clue what they are missing ;) We do, and that's called cancer;)
126.
by neya 5mo ago
> I’ve always been struck by a recurring trend: whenever a customer throws a tantrum, threatens legal recourse, or takes things to an extreme, they are almost invariably another business owner. If a business owner threatens legal recours
127.
by neya 5mo ago
It's always the MBAs. The organizational structure incentivises them on the wrong metrics. So they adapt and optimize for that. In real life, after a while, you hit a plateau with features and market demand. What these MBA clowns love
128.
by neya 5mo ago
> This idea of software threatening the user with consequences is totally wild and dystopian. This idea of software built on top of reverse-engineered data threatening the user with consequences is what's really even wild and dystop
129.
by neya 5mo ago
From what I can see, one of the top comments (at the time of this comment) is worried about legalese claiming to have "non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, fully paid-up, non-sublicensable" access to your source code. I think i
130.
by neya 5mo ago
Haha thx :)))
131.
by neya 5mo ago
The issue is not stealing the idea itself. The issue is stealing the work in its entirety - as is - with all its flaws and character intact. That's what makes art unique, right? I would think the same goes for codebases too. On a perso
132.
by neya 5mo ago
All this because Microsoft won't sunset the crap that is Azure and rebuild something reliable from ground up. GitHub survived on Ruby On Rails - which was notorious for being slow at scale back then - and still managed to have better u
133.
by neya 5mo ago
I'm an artist turned CTO. My perspective is really simple - theft is theft. You (not you specifically per se) can sugar coat it however you like, but copying open source codebases/work is different from stealing proprietary&#x2F
134.
by neya 5mo ago
The whole clickbait article can be summarized in one line: Let a cheap agent decide if the expensive one is needed
135.
by neya 5mo ago
> but first you have to read it successfully. 1/2 * x What do you think 1/2 here is? Stick to doom.
136.
by neya 5mo ago
So, one of the reasons I asked is because the motors used in EV's also are usually embedded inside transmissions which require regular oil changes (like any gearbox) and the motor itself needs to be serviced every x years - or even be
137.
by neya 5mo ago
I thought EV's also have maintenance costs and energy costs?
138.
by neya 5mo ago
Wow, didn't know that. Thanks for sharing.
139.
by neya 5mo ago
Bingo. I have a bunch of Sony WF-Xm4s and Xm3s and an Airpod pro. If I have to take a call, it's always the Airpod for me because it's so reliable. I just snap it into my ears and it literally just works. The Sony - while having a
140.
by neya 5mo ago
This is nothing wrong. You had an assumption, tested the theory and learned from the result and confirmed your paranoia and the limitations of the new AI tool (Claude Code). I assume this is a personal project, so you had limited consequenc
141.
by neya 6mo ago
I was blown away - how they shrugged it off casually too "it found credentials in one file" - why the fuck does an agent have access to it in the first place? They claim the token should be able to change only custom domains. Howe
142.
by neya 6mo ago
I read the article and boy, the author blames everyone - LLMs, Anthropic, Cursor, Railway - literally everyone else involved except themselves. I would never take this person seriously in any professional context whatsover.
143.
by neya 6mo ago
So, there is 0 differentiation from this and OpenRouter. The only difference is just that it is European in name only, but underlying services are not. And the pricing also isn't any cheaper. So, why would I spend my development hours
144.
by neya 6mo ago
> when open weight models are good enough I think Deepseek is already there.
145.
by neya 6mo ago
Haha, that was a funny quote!
146.
by neya 6mo ago
Yeah, exactly. I can totally relate to this. I have actually monitored my productivity on an excel sheet and the days with coffee win by a large margin. I am not sure if it's withdrawal symptoms on the days without, though.
147.
by neya 6mo ago
The only good thing that keeps me from collapsing into a state of limbo is coffee and now, even that's bad (seems more like a mixed bag, but still)? Sigh.
148.
by neya 6mo ago
> It is a similar kind of lending loop to that which went on during the late 1990's leading up to the 2000 crash. Interesting...
149.
by neya 6mo ago
The lack of trust isn't because of its abilities. The lack of trust is because OpenAI publicly suggested publicly about licensing our code bases. They hinted at a rug pull along the lines of "if you use our generated code, we woul
150.
by neya 6mo ago
Stop using Javascript. Or Typescript or whatever excuses they have for the fundamentally flawed language that should have been retired eons ago instead of trying to get it fixed. Javascript, its ecosystem has always been a pack of cards. Ti

More ›