neya

24 ms·

511.
by neya 1y ago
I meant to say that MCP is just a wrapper around good old function/tool calling, it's not a new superpower by itself. So, if you're designing a Saas, you don't need to use MCP yourself, you can just use good old function
512.
by neya 1y ago
I guess you missed the recent fiasco https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxg5LzFw-_g&t=33s https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/06/06/clarification-a...
513.
by neya 1y ago
Obligatory note - if you're a backend developer, you do not need MCP. MCP is just tool/function calling. It has been around for a lot longer now. MCP is only needed if you need something to integrate with the frontend chat applica
514.
by neya 1y ago
Who cares, it's Adobe. They'll eventually steal your work under some under-the-hood TOS update and even charge you for it. Don't believe me? Ask the existing CS customers. Fuck Adobe. They should be boycotted to oblivion.
515.
by neya 1y ago
I use o3, it's really good with Elixir. I prefer it to Claude, but Claude does a decent job as well. If you want to take your website and business down, use ChatGPT-4o's code
516.
by neya 1y ago
In 2010, Facebook was one of the best websites to browse. It was everything you wanted a central social media platform to be. You could stay updated about your friends, family and even host pages for your business on it. Everything was just
517.
by neya 1y ago
>I think you have an overcomplicated idea of what a "server" That's actually true, because I'm always thinking from a cloud deployment perspective (which is my use case). What kind of architecture do you run this on,
518.
by neya 1y ago
I'm not sure about that. Newer models are able to output structured outputs perfectly and infact, if you combine it with changesets, you can have insanely useful applications since changesets also provide type-checking. For example, in
519.
by neya 1y ago
Looks pretty cool, thanks for sharing!
520.
by neya 1y ago
It is only undesirable if you are to expose your APIs for others to use via a consumer facing client. As a backend developer, I'm writing a backend for my app to consume, not for consumers (like MCP is designed for). So, this is better
521.
by neya 1y ago
> The problem with making it one server with 100 modules is doing that in a language agnostic way I agree with this. For my particular use-case, I'm completely into Elixir, so, for backend work, it doesn't provide much benefit
522.
by neya 1y ago
If you search for MCP integrations, you will find tons of MCP "servers", which basically are entire servers for just one vendor's API (sometimes just for one of their products, eg. YouTube). This is the go to default right no
523.
by neya 1y ago
> just making a monolith MCP combining multiple disparate API This is what I ended up doing. The reason I thought I must do it the "MCP way" was because of the tons of YouTube videos about MCP which just kept saying how much of
524.
by neya 1y ago
One of the biggest lessons for me while riding the MCP hype was that if you're writing backend software, you don't actually need to do MCP. Architecturally, they don't make sense. Atleast not on Elixir anyway. One server per
525.
by neya 1y ago
Finally they decided to open up Nikola Tesla's work huh? :)))
526.
by neya 1y ago
I never mentioned LiveView in my comment, just Phoenix (you can use Phoenix without LiveView). But, in defense of LiveView, I use it in production - however, you will need something to compliment it for sure - I use Svelte 5, which is great
527.
by neya 1y ago
I was a Rails consultant for about 7 years. Then, I switched to Phoenix - really out of just curiosity. Since then, I've never looked back. If you never believed in "Simple is better" philosophy, you will after using Phoenix.
528.
by neya 1y ago
Did Apple just do *{ opacity: 0.36 } And call it revolutionary?
529.
by neya 1y ago
Yep, it is not able to recognize. To be fair, it's not just dump it into ChatGPT and copy paste kind of AI. We feed it into the model in stages, we use 2-3 different models for content generation, and another 2 later on to smoothen the
530.
by neya 1y ago
> We asked some Which part of this looks like bullying? It was opt-in. They attended the presentation because they were interested.
531.
by neya 1y ago
I can tell you this much - most people who are opposed to AI writing blog articles are usually from the editorial team. They somehow believe they're immune to being replaced by AI. And this stems from the misconception that AI content
532.
by neya 1y ago
I loved this too. The frontpage era content actually still works really well on today's modern screens. Most of them barely have any CSS in them even.
533.
by neya 1y ago
I think the perfect era for webpages were the late 1990s to early 2000s. No popups, good old marquee, buttons were clear and explicit, you could confidently click a hyperlink knowing full well it's going to take you to the page it said
534.
by neya 1y ago
This is really cool! Not just that, we actually really needed something like this in Elixir for a lot of projects and always had to end up going with some NodeJS implementation. Thank you <3
535.
by neya 1y ago
I never book AirBnB's because they refuse to address the core issues of privacy within the homes - such as owners installing hidden cameras. So many private videos are shared from AirBnB's and yet they do nothing about it - simply
536.
N8n is not open source and your project is gaslighting its users (2019)(github.com)
9 points by neya 1y ago|2 comments
537.
by neya 2y ago
The most annoying part of all this is they replaced o1 with o3 without any notices or warnings. This is why I hate proprietary models.
538.
This Coder Is a Pleb(github.com)
1 points by neya 2y ago|0 comments
539.
by neya 2y ago
Damn, I didn't know this!
540.
by neya 2y ago
I understand not everyone is able to get rid of Adobe and their eco-system immediately, but I had the last straw after 1) they slapped a cloud integration on top of perfectly working offline softwares and labelling it Creative Cloud, fuckin

More ›