new299

88 ms·

751.
by new299 12y ago
If you just want get an idea of how it works, try the "Eliza" example. That connects, via an ssh client implemented in the browser, to the hosting server.
752.
by new299 12y ago
Thanks, yes at present both projects are mostly proof of concepts. I'd want to see if they gain any general interest before putting much more time into them and improving documentation (and to be frank general quality of the code).
753.
Show HN: Minaterm an SSH Client Implemented in JavaScript(minaterm.com)
13 points by new299 12y ago|3 comments
754.
by new299 12y ago
libvterm is really awesome and a very powerful library it's great to see it getting more use. I've previously used it for a graphical terminal project ( http://41j.com/hterm ) and via Emscripten to create a web-base
755.
by new299 12y ago
I’ve been working on this little side project as a proof of concept. It's a port of libssh2 to Javascript via Emscripten. This let me implement a complete ssh client in browsers alllowing end-to-end encrypted ssh sessions. The session
756.
Show HN: Minaterm, a web-based SSH client with end-to-end encryption(minaterm.com)
1 points by new299 12y ago|1 comments
757.
by new299 12y ago
The Domesday project has faired rather better than many other projects it's content is accessible online: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/domesday And I believe the content on the original Laserdiscs has been reverse
758.
by new299 12y ago
Just to clarify the position you're arguing for. A university has a bunch of existing videos that have been taken of lectures. Someone asks "can I put these online for free?". The answer should be no you can't unless you
759.
by new299 12y ago
Yes, this is what I meant. I also had a specific example in mind. Here's the scenario: You're a hardware vendor, you lead the market. The hardware you sell has also has a software component. You'd like to take software out of
760.
by new299 12y ago
> Huh? Are you saying you can't make a profit from gpl-ed code? Then why was it written to begin with? If company A can profit from it, then so can company B. I think selling GPL'd software is a difficult proposition yes. I don
761.
by new299 12y ago
As a developer, the GPL is useful when you want to ensure that people don't take your work and profit from it. So it's often useful when companies want to level the playing field, without allowing competitors to gain an advantage.
762.
by new299 12y ago
OccupyGPL now redirects to "choosealicense.com", but it's still available on waybackmachine if anyone's interested: http://web.archive.org/web/20150210203941/http://www.occupyg...
763.
by new299 12y ago
My understanding is that every Japanese adult has their own Koseki Touhon. So I don't think you join the Koseki, but my understanding maybe incorrect. Children are registered on their parents Koseki. Marriages are also registered. When
764.
by new299 12y ago
The article in question used the Illumina HiSeq 2500 for sequencing. Which would normally be described as a "next-generation" or "2nd generation" sequencer. I would guess that the rapid reduction in sequencing cost, has
765.
by new299 12y ago
I couldn't see a purchase option was it present? I had the feeling it was in the terms in case he decided to do it later. The image element resource licenses are listed in the Resources section. Most of them appear to be relatively per
766.
by new299 12y ago
Hahaha, awesome I think I'll use this one day. The terms of use are pretty interesting. Looking like the PNGs you can download are unrestricted in terms of use. But they may plan to add a payment feature for SVG downloads: "Hipste
767.
by new299 12y ago
I think it's because you wrote: "Understanding security is more than just "yes or no". You must understand the concepts. If you don't, stop professionally writing software, because you're doing something irresp
768.
by new299 12y ago
Huh? The luminisence is for very short periods of time, but I don't believe it's particularly challenging to detect. I would imagine it's more challenging to setup the chamber. The first paragraph of the wikipedia article sho
769.
by new299 12y ago
yep, I find it interesting that on a relatively small budget (hobbyist level) you can reproduce an experiment which exhibits unexplained physical phenomena. It gives me some home that there's still interesting experimental physics to b
770.
by new299 12y ago
I always find reading over this article pretty entertaining, in particular Sonoluminescence generally catches my attention: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence As it seems like it should be practical to repli
771.
by new299 12y ago
This is pretty much the content of this article: "Yahoo is showing progress. Revenue from the businesses Ms. Mayer created or acquired are growing at an annual rate of 80 percent, she announced in Yahoo’s last earnings update. She also
772.
by new299 12y ago
My guess is that a part of the issue is that VCs can understand WhatsApp. They feel like that can assess it's worth, associated risk, and come up with a valuation independently. With science based startups the partner at a VC can'
773.
by new299 12y ago
Yes, I guess it could be argued that this is part of the way they managed their deduplication system, and that once all links had been removed the context would be removed. Certainly similar arguments could probably be used for copyrighted
774.
by new299 12y ago
Just, in case it's of interest, statements from Kim suggest that he was trying to comply with the DMCA. That all major studios has direct access to the platform to delete links. I personally find the issues unclear, as obviously to a d
775.
by new299 12y ago
Fascinating. Here's the Economist reference (one of the sources cited in the Wikipedia article): "According to a European Parliament report, published in 2001, America's National Security Agency (NSA) intercepted faxes and ph
776.
by new299 12y ago
This is amazing. I wonder if anyone has done something similar for email spam.
777.
by new299 12y ago
The telemarketing robots that are scripted well enough to continually deny that they're robots are somehow the scariest/most impressive for me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unRDMy7O62o
778.
by new299 12y ago
Ah I see. Thanks! I guess one take away from this document is that there have been attempts to limit the availability of encryption for at least 20 years. But I think that's relatively well known.
779.
by new299 12y ago
Section 2804 refers to products manufactured and used in the US. But section 2803 is pretty clear: "New section 2803 will make it unlawful after January 31, 2000, to sell in interstate or foreign commerce any encryption product that do
780.
by new299 12y ago
It was interesting, but the take home message actually seemed to be that RedStar Linux isn't that widely deployed and most people run Windows XP.

More ›