netr0ute

39 ms·

451.
by netr0ute 5y ago
I'm just interested in substantial discussion by wanting to know what exactly happened with modification of some radio device.
452.
by netr0ute 5y ago
What proof do you have? If you can't give a specific example, your argument might as well be corporate PR.
453.
by netr0ute 5y ago
> until I got to the parts about interfering with assorted Air Traffic Control frequencies I'm ok with this.
454.
by netr0ute 5y ago
You say all this as if the megacorps with signed firmware can't make mistakes.
455.
by netr0ute 5y ago
They might have done this to extract instruments, and if you can extract one then maybe you can just subtract it from the main recording. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081030201607.h...
456.
by netr0ute 5y ago
This is untrue, things like Fourier transforms can account for those variables.
457.
by netr0ute 5y ago
Most people did exactly that a year ago.
458.
by netr0ute 5y ago
There's also asbestos siding which is common on older houses.
459.
by netr0ute 5y ago
I'd expect those ISPs to use jumbo frames only where they use PPPoE so that it looks "transparent" to non-PPPoE traffic.
460.
by netr0ute 5y ago
There's no way to if the system is designed specifically to be uncensorable, but maybe you could blackhole routes on the BGP level.
461.
by netr0ute 5y ago
This is what YT used to be, some place to host video files and where people could just add comments.
462.
by netr0ute 5y ago
Hot Take: There should be no secrecy at all (FOSH) and instead let companies create real competition.
463.
by netr0ute 5y ago
Hot Take: If your website needs ads to survive, it wasn't that good to begin with.
464.
by netr0ute 5y ago
The layer system used by TCP/IP (layer 2 -> 3 -> 4) makes it "simpler" because everything can be compartmentalized without worrying because it was designed to be that way. The real problem comes when you use TCP/UD
465.
by netr0ute 5y ago
C/C++ isn't the issue, it's the lack of not using memory-safe features like smart pointers which you'll need C++ for.
466.
by netr0ute 5y ago
That's a problem and likely isn't going to go away unless something big happens with the political system, like maybe a third party taking over.
467.
by netr0ute 5y ago
While it's true, the level you would have to be at to have to worry about sanctions puts you into "too big to fail" territory.
468.
by netr0ute 5y ago
> Sanction violations are something the feds take extremely seriously. This is just FUD.
469.
by netr0ute 5y ago
There can't be any power anomaly if you use self-hosted energy like solar panels, so that part's out.
470.
by netr0ute 5y ago
This is the worst case scenario.
471.
by netr0ute 5y ago
The sites that actually have something good to say will never block out poor people by virtue of their owners being smart enough to factor this into their costs.
472.
by netr0ute 5y ago
Who says we have to listen to ARIN, APNIC, and the others?
473.
by netr0ute 5y ago
Ironic, because responsiveness might inherently make it undependable because if you really needed to know where you are right now, that multiple-second delay isn't going to help.
474.
by netr0ute 5y ago
People do, and the JS algorithms will get added to adblocker lists in no time.
475.
by netr0ute 5y ago
That's what JavaScript blockers like NoScript and uBlock Origin are for.
476.
by netr0ute 5y ago
If companies replace roles of the government, then this limitation no longer applies.
477.
by netr0ute 5y ago
Problem is, the kinds of people who are interested in this kind of thing don't care if it's illegal or not.
478.
by netr0ute 5y ago
You probably could have done the equivalent if it were IA-64, but I suspect you can't do this with plain old branch-prediction mechanisms.
479.
by netr0ute 5y ago
Is Internet Explorer still that popular to require extra support?
480.
by netr0ute 5y ago
"Keep Receiving our News" seems to do nothing when clicked (no browser-level modal) so that has to be the worst-labeled "No" button on any website.

More ›