nephyrin

6 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by nephyrin 14y ago

   If this is the case for you please file a bug - a lot of private browsing changes have been occurring under the hood in preparation for proper per-window private browsing in FF21, so it's very possible a regression snuck in :(
2. 32.▲
   by nephyrin 14y ago

   Nothing! pdf.js is already a part of the Octane benchmark and works well in chrome: http://mozilla.github.com/pdf.js/web/viewer.html Mozilla is about moving the web forward, not just beating the other guy, so I don't imagine there'd be an
3. 33.▲
   by nephyrin 14y ago

   They marked it as a duplicate of the given bug, and a mozilla security manager politely explained why: > The "documentation"(?) was maybe an announcement about the changes in bug 754608, which made the thumbnails follow the caching rule
4. 34.▲
   by nephyrin 14y ago

   > Yes - except this is HTTPS cache - and takes screenshots of your HTTPS data. HTTPS is also cached by every major browser, meaning the image in question would be in your cache just as well as the screenshot containing it. > Its sil
5. 35.▲
   by nephyrin 14y ago

   > This barcode was stored on my hard drive unencrypted as a simple image You mean like the HTTP cache? Maybe I'm reading this bug wrong, but it appears to be a verified bug with csec-disclosure and sec-low security ratings. Not finding