Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
neotek
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
391.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
It gets even better than that if you're in an approved accelerator / incubator: you get $60,000 USD in hosting credits, at a rate of $5,000 a month. We're entirely hosted on Azure using their Linux VMs and have had a great ex
392.
▲
A woman's life in search queries (2006)
(pentadact.com)
1 points
by
neotek
13y ago
|
0 comments
393.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
This reminds me of an interesting question posed on reddit in /r/programming a few years ago: if you were stuck in a room with a blank PC with only a floppy drive and disk, what's the bare minimum that would need to be on the
394.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
None of which necessarily makes Threes a better game. I enjoyed (and still enjoy) 2048 far more than I ever enjoyed Threes, simple though it may be.
395.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
So, so many bizarre porn-related domains.
396.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
He doesn't even believe in free and open marriages...
397.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
That's a shame, because Minecrift[1] is the most astonishing Oculus experience I've had so far. Just being inside a world I had created, surrounded by peaceful ambience, floating above the treetops (fly mod, heh) - I can't ex
398.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Their PE ratio is ~106, they'd be crazy not to take advantage of that.
399.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Oculus wasn't exactly starving for cash, and even if they were investors would have beaten each other to death for a chance to pour some cash into it.
400.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Maybe this is my personal bias showing, but surely Google is more of a general technology company than Facebook could hope to be. Google has a long-term, sustainable business that continually makes huge strides in new markets - from revolut
401.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Why on earth would Oculus sell at all, least of all to Facebook? What possible reason could Facebook have to purchase a company so far removed from its core competency? People in the /r/oculus reddit are already expressing strong
402.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Alternatively, you can base your business model on tricking people into subscribing to a service they likely don't know they're subscribing to. http://techcrunch.com/2013/09/27/not-so-vip/
403.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
"Reject" is fine, it means "a person or thing dismissed as inadequate or unacceptable."
404.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Turkey's government is getting really good at turning molehills into mountains.
405.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
People are quick to paint this as Facebook twisting the screw, but do we know definitively, not speculatively, that this is an intentional and planned effect, like there's some variable somewhere that determines what percentage of a pa
406.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Ultimately, why should anyone care whether 2048 hurts Threes' sales? Should developers (or anyone for that matter) have any obligation to consider the impact of their work on someone else's product's commercial viability?
407.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
I far prefer threaded discussions to flat discussions. The ability to hide child comments on a top-level comment is a godsend for wading through lengthy threads (so much so that I made a small Chrome extension to automatically hide child co
408.
▲
Are gorillas using sign language really communicating with humans?
(straightdope.com)
4 points
by
neotek
13y ago
|
0 comments
409.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Specifically here, for those interested: http://www.reddit.com/r/MH370/comments/20kdna/mh370_another_...
410.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
I mean non-commercial in the sense that the person doing the downloading (or uploading) isn't doing so to generate a commercial benefit, not whether or not the product being pirated is commercial in nature. >which can be categorized
411.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Non-commercial piracy should be a civil matter, not a criminal one.
412.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
How is a private tracker going to help if anyone can register an account there?
413.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Issuing shares to the public (that is to say, not to a restricted group of sophisticated investors) is far more difficult and expensive than just taking donations. Here in Australia a proprietary company can't take investment from (or
414.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Well, there's always capital gains when you sell. I'd say investors aren't buying Google stock because they want to control the company, they're buying Google stock because the people who do control the company are d
415.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Actually it can make it easier to cheat in a sense - if you make a bad move you can just replay the current game until a few moves before, stop the replay, and keep playing :) Incidentally, I like the corner tactic you used, that's wha
416.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
I'm seriously addicted to this game, and wanted to be able to share replays with some similarly affected friends, so I bodged together a replay system that records moves and tiles as you play and mungs all the numbers together to make
417.
▲
Show HN: 2048 with shareable replays
(sdmtr.github.io)
2 points
by
neotek
13y ago
|
4 comments
418.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
What do they care? They sign a bit of paper and a few months later money appears in their account.
419.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Because competition drives innovation. We wouldn't have Chrome today if nobody had bothered competing against IE. We wouldn't have Google if nobody thought they could do better than Altavista.
420.
▲
by
neotek
13y ago
Conspiracy theorists think Snopes is either part of the conspiracy[1] or isn't a reliable source of information (as compared to anonymous, breathlessly apocalyptic Wordpress blogs, of course.) [1] https://news.ycombinator.co
More ›