neolog

46 ms·

481.
by neolog 6y ago
I think I didn't explain my point well. I don't call people using MIT stealing, it was just an analogy, maybe an unclear one. Anyway. > Calling another community "impoverished" which is far larger and produces way mor
482.
by neolog 6y ago
> "rooster" is also slang for "penis" What dialect has "rooster" as slang for penis?
483.
by neolog 6y ago
> It's legally prohibited until a certain amount of animal testing has been performed. Link?
484.
by neolog 6y ago
Because of Go, I have to monitor what language a command-line program is written in before using it.
485.
by neolog 6y ago
I don't think that argument works. Stealing, for example, is old and common but still impoverishes the community. Way more people are involved in making closed-source software. MIT license encourages more closed source software, while
486.
by neolog 6y ago
> As they said in the video, the animal is doing the activity of it of it's own free will. Why don't they do it on humans then?
487.
by neolog 6y ago
The MIT license encourages freeriding and impoverishes the free-software community, which reduces overall freedom.
488.
by neolog 6y ago
The reality is pretty diverse. Plenty of people use mostly or only free software. I certainly do.
489.
by neolog 6y ago
Conda isn't really science specific, just like pip isn't webdev specific.
490.
by neolog 6y ago
I mean mechanically, what is it actually doing
491.
by neolog 6y ago
If you want to benefit from free software you can share your own software by licensing it GPL.
492.
by neolog 6y ago
What does it do?
493.
by neolog 6y ago
You can't install a poetry package editably into another environment. It's really a missing feature in the pyproject spec. There's an open issue about it under one of the pypa repos. Someone just needs to do the work of imple
494.
by neolog 6y ago
git (noun): an unpleasant or contemptible person
495.
by neolog 6y ago
> recommending poetry for a beginner is a bad idea. Strongly disagree. There are so many footguns with low-level tools like pip that I can't recommend it to anybody but an expert (but an expert doesn't need my recommendation an
496.
by neolog 6y ago
That's often called "vendoring" these days.
497.
by neolog 6y ago
How large a room is that in?
498.
by neolog 6y ago
> Why is the timeline you personally find realistic relevant to anyone else but you? I don't get this attitude. The author is an expert. Can't we learn from her?
499.
by neolog 6y ago
> You seem to be confusing packages with "apps". I'm not confusing libraries with applications. Pinning dependency versions enables a repeatable test environment.
500.
by neolog 6y ago
> I don't think a piece on gnu.org qualifies as "plenty of writing" There are some links there to other pieces if you want to read more about it. > for sure doesn't count as basis for what you are entitled for I&#x
501.
by neolog 6y ago
I don't know how much the original author had to do with Python's success in the last 20 years. The success of Python in data science is because of NumPy/Scipy/Pandas. Things like packaging that needed leadership never g
502.
by neolog 6y ago
> so expensive that many competitors couldn't afford to use them Olympic athletes don't buy their own equipment, do they?
503.
by neolog 6y ago
> Support for poetry environments is currently our highest upvoted feature request on GitHub. https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-python/wiki/Support-poet...
504.
by neolog 6y ago
IIRC box fan + filter works as well as expensive systems.
505.
by neolog 6y ago
It's only three years old, I can't think of many big projects created in that timespan.
506.
by neolog 6y ago
Down to 2-4 from what level unfiltered?
507.
by neolog 6y ago
Yeah it's pretty good. There are plenty of problems and holes of course, but for most pure-Python packages it does a nice job most of the time. If you're an expert, you can do it with setup.py or setup.cfg, but I don't think
508.
by neolog 6y ago
Poetry is better.
509.
by neolog 6y ago
It's fragmented, but it doesn't need to be error prone if people use the good tools instead of the old low-level tools.
510.
by neolog 6y ago
> You don't need to solve all those problems at once. Why spend time tweaking the setup when you can just get it right in the first place with less work?

More ›