negus

9 ms·

91.
by negus 9y ago
Can you mention something more specific, than suspicion to "homegrown encryption algorithms" that is just a yet another combination of DH-RSA-AES ?
92.
by negus 9y ago
"dev, gn, /svc, /pkg, PA_VMAR_ROOT" Hate this old unix approach for name shortening, what makes them unreadable and non intuitive. If they break compatibility anyway, they could name things in a way, that people can rea
93.
by negus 9y ago
The story about Church protest has no proof. At least I tried to find it and found nothing worthy
94.
by negus 10y ago
"But how do you verify that the compiler produces the code you wanted it to create?" You open it in disassembler and look through. It's a white box. "But how do you verify that the Computer actually does what is in the B
95.
by negus 10y ago
tldr?
96.
by negus 10y ago
nop. 27.24% not all citizens, but only Moscow residents were allowed to participate, so probably 40m+
97.
by negus 10y ago
10k? And who are these millions, supporting the man, who states that Putin's party and Putin himself are thieves? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_mayoral_election,_2013
98.
by negus 10y ago
Are you really surprised, that largest European internet company has own TLD when even Suzuki, BMW and mormons have one? https://nic.yandex
99.
by negus 10y ago
Not sure, that it is a problem. If you consider to use such scalable system, you certanly will build a completely separate cluster for it. For such case, there is no real difference what distro to use, even if your ops team are redhat/
100.
by negus 10y ago
wtf is "pico process" and "pico driver"?
101.
by negus 11y ago
you're calculating load time the wrong way - you should not do time check outside the process as you do calling 'time' as another process from shell. consider using curl profiling option next time
102.
by negus 11y ago
Pushing? Lol, they've pushed it long time ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_disclosure_law
103.
by negus 11y ago
Confidentiality is my only concern in the case of malicious modification. Remember, that availability and integrity of your database can be broken without an attacker, just due to hardware problem, for example. So it is up to you to have a
104.
by negus 11y ago
Answering on whether somebody did an audit for KeePass http://keepass.info/ratings.html I'm not sure but one may look at https://www.allianz-fuer-cybersicherheit.de/ACS/DE/_download... and h
105.
by negus 11y ago
Could you please provide more details on suggested attack?
106.
by negus 11y ago
Ok, your password database was affected by malicious modification. So what? How it can break the confidentiality of your data? Update: By the way, what's wrong with the bytearray compare code snippet?
107.
by negus 12y ago
If John McAfee can see this himself http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKgf5PaBzyg
108.
by negus 12y ago
except uk? even in China there is no http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_disclosure_law
109.
by negus 13y ago
nop. even if it would - HN users will find their way through such blocks, in contrast with mass media users