neglesaks

9 ms·

91.
by neglesaks 3y ago
That's not true, GW/CC hasn't had any major political or popular traction before around year 2000, so ~25 yrs.
92.
by neglesaks 3y ago
Not "naked government", but government bureaucracy that's targeted by tailored ESG efforts, where the hordes of ESG consultants and influencers and activists largely get their ideas from the same uniform pool of ideas.
93.
by neglesaks 3y ago
The post you're responding to doesn't argue from blind optimism, it argued a reasonably-expected gain in net beneficial effects.
94.
by neglesaks 3y ago
One cannot take seriously people that use the most extreme outlier event in the history of a technology as a generally representative data point for said technology.
95.
by neglesaks 3y ago
You've missed New York Times having sued OAI and Microsoft recently, and joined by several others?
96.
by neglesaks 3y ago
"Common knowledge" built on cherry-picking data and new alternatives is what we call "fashion". Also, basing energy supply considerations solely on a dollar cost notion is questionable, even if the dollar cost values wer
97.
by neglesaks 3y ago
Exactly, it's not much different from the clickbaity tabloid headlines: "ONG BAD STUFF HAPPENS HERE NOW". Very short sighted, and tend to finger current participants as bad, instead of offering a proper historical perspective
98.
by neglesaks 3y ago
Oh, I agree, but some corporate spreadsheet jockey may not think that 3% sounds like much.
99.
by neglesaks 3y ago
16 pages of notification switches to disable? This is wickedness on par with Meta's current way to navigate your personal/account settings, which is most likely engineered to look descriptive and helpful, but is actually impossibl