Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
necheffa
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
You may want to take a look at some of the sleuthing Wendell over on Level1Techs did. He was able to identify a large group of CPUs used in W680 chipset motherboards (i.e. using stock Intel power curves, never seeing a lick of overclocking&
32.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
That depends on how you authenticate. If you pass your SSH password on the command line then anyone on your machine doing a `ps` at the right time could see your password. I find using a ssh-agent to load password protected SSH keys works b
33.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
Yes. With Xpra you have a headless X session on the remote machine and you "detach" and "attach" to it from the client. So whatever X applications you leave running will be right where you left them.
34.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
> "Save while you're earning decent cash" seems pretty actionable to me. This is in fact pretty unactionable unless you are planning on boondocking during your career and retirement - at which point - why bother with post
35.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
> No, it's an economic limitation. I don't believe that I said it was not. Although, you should look at France as a special case. > You can of course turn the output of a nuclear plant up and down, reasonably quickly. Well,
36.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
> one of its biggest hurdles is that it can't adjust up and down for demand very well This is a historic limitation. We have the technology to perform load follow with the legacy fleet. Most utilities just designed their fleets arou
37.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
Not to mention the bureaucracy tax; Boeing has had far more time to let the bureaucracy metastasize.
38.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
Someone already mentioned that your ECU doesn't really need to talk to other systems (besides perhaps via the OBD-II port with a well established, industry standard, backed by regulation protocol). And I'll also add that at no poi
39.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
> Code left alone "does not rust". I think I am uniquely qualified to speak authoritatively on this subject as I regularly work in code bases dating back to the mid 1950s (nearly 70 years old if you are counting). Code left alo
40.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
Is the plan then to retire fairly early and focus on people stuff and hobbies?
41.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
Your job, as an engineer, is to keep the ship battle ready. Not waste time by ceding control to another entity that doesn't have any engineering know-how to evaluate what does and does not need done. Take the reigns and do what needs d
42.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
> Product should have nothing to do with refactors on the systems. That should be an engineering responsibility. In practice, Product often controls the budget. So even if Product doesn't have the explicit power to veto a refactor,
43.
▲
by
necheffa
2y ago
Assuming above ground lines: On the same "holder", no, just due to how the wire is fastened to the poll. On the same poll, maybe, depends on how much poll real estate is available. Usually though there is not extra space available
44.
▲
by
necheffa
3y ago
Yes, it says you probably got started before the f90 standard.
45.
▲
by
necheffa
3y ago
So bootstrap in freestanding does make this kind of attack much more difficult to pull off, but with contemporary hardware, it does not fully prevent the attack. What if the trojan is in microcode? No amount of bootstrap in freestanding can
46.
▲
by
necheffa
3y ago
> however with software nobody dies Well...no actually. This may be the case for _some_ software. I happen to work on (software) products where public safety is a concern.
47.
▲
by
necheffa
3y ago
TCP/IP is so well defined because the engineers on these small teams are the ones publishing the standards. It isn't like they are simply reading a spec out of an existing document and coding up a conformant program.
48.
▲
by
necheffa
3y ago
> I have no idea, but I would assume most parts are custom machined to spec. If that's true, you'd just need to find machine shops capable of making the parts. You call up your local nuclear reactor spare parts vendor and place
49.
▲
by
necheffa
3y ago
> I can't even imagine how you'd get the parts, and they probably can't change the plans either. One of the bullets on the box is that the AP1000 uses a fairly standardized design, unlike many prior designs which were most
50.
▲
by
necheffa
3y ago
MPI is industry standard at this point.
51.
▲
by
necheffa
3y ago
Westinghouse also supports VVER-1000 too. https://www.westinghousenuclear.com/Portals/0/operating%20pl...
52.
▲
by
necheffa
3y ago
> Isn't not 'burnt' by any reasonable interpretation of the word FYI, this is a pretty typical industry term. Even to the point where "burn up" is a unit of measure tracked at operation and within model predictio
53.
▲
by
necheffa
4y ago
Person A taking a code base private that solves 95% of their problem and refusing to release fixes-and-features upstream hurts the entire community.
54.
▲
by
necheffa
4y ago
If you pay attention to the ddrescue output it is pretty obvious when you are missing a few bytes here and there. I have long since moved away from optical media, really for anything, but especially archival. Long term storage to me looks l
55.
▲
by
necheffa
4y ago
I would be surprised if you are not the only one.
56.
▲
by
necheffa
4y ago
So...disable the container feature? Do you just not review the configuration of your networking equipment? It is a convenient way to maximize hardware in SOHO deployments.
57.
▲
by
necheffa
4y ago
As someone who has had to clean up (with backwards compatibility) after people who YOLO'd custom grammars rather than actually taking the time to respect the mathematics of parsing and design ambiguity out up front... I cannot disagree
58.
▲
by
necheffa
4y ago
I mean, I have a 32" 4k monitor for a reason.
59.
▲
by
necheffa
4y ago
I add cream and sugar if I'm getting coffee out. At home, I'm drinking it black. Most places, especially ones that don't specialize in coffee, do not properly clean their equipment and prep the brew. If I was just a junkie, I
60.
▲
by
necheffa
4y ago
The technology to do load follow at a nuclear plant exists. If you think about it, "base load" has nothing to do with the power source. Given some period of time, say a day, you are always going to have a certain minimum demand fo
More ›