nebulousthree

8 ms·

31.
by nebulousthree 3y ago
Every hire is a chance taken for both sides of the transaction. This argument is tired and can be spun another way: a new employee is a blank slate. The employer will define a working method that cannot be compared and judged based on exper
32.
by nebulousthree 3y ago
Try being a little more understanding. Psychological prisons are almost never obvious to oneself. It takes time, especially dead time, to recognize the impact of our words and behaviours on ourselves and the people we surround ourselves wit
33.
by nebulousthree 3y ago
Perhaps the workers should monetize the implicit factors of the job in order to get their true value. After all, labelling is one thing. Labelling correctly is another thing entirely. Labelling at high speed is another thing. Labelling
34.
by nebulousthree 3y ago
Maybe they're still sore from the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook%E2%80%93Cambridge_Ana...
35.
by nebulousthree 3y ago
It's because the pot is calling the kettle black and then getting annoyed when it is called out on it. It's not that complicated, and it doesn't call into question the legitimacy of the criticism. It just says: "you&#x27
36.
by nebulousthree 3y ago
I would argue that because your body is the one doing the perceiving, there is likely no limit to the ability of our perceptions influencing our bodies. Belief alone can't move a mountain, but is that not because the belief is not stro
37.
by nebulousthree 3y ago
Probably around the same time as "a little bit of wine is actually good for you".
38.
by nebulousthree 3y ago
I don't think it matters that they knew. Either ambient light hits your eyes or it doesn't. What about other factors that make it sleep-mask specific like the feeling of textile over your eyes, or the strain of the strap around yo
39.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
With humans it's just that the stakes are high because you cannot generally have a human at your beck and call like we do with machines in general. If you limited to 5 questions per topic and and overall use time limit, you might see d
40.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
(It's almost as if it's because they're able to differentiate between a machine and a human being.)
41.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
They conflict if the increase in sharpness is interpreted as a follow-up to the claim that neurons don't grow back. How can there be an increase of function without an "increase" in neurons (they don't grow back)?
42.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
Don't have to hire security to escort everyone out if they're already home.
43.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
Or..luck and enough tries at it? Maybe there's survivorship bias in goal setting
44.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
PMCs love this study!
45.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
Who knew that the primary incentive being economic would lead to a convergence of human behaviours? Every profit-motive champion raved about the variety produced by means of competition. Instead, the fear of failure from truly distinguishin
46.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
Is that like a pat down search at the supermarket??
47.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
Hello ChatGPT, good to have you!
48.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
Books rob students of the motivation to memorize and recite for themselves.
49.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
That's because it's not the propositions that need to be transparent. Politicians are great at explaining their grandiose propositions. It's the actions taken and the results that need to be transparent.
50.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
Dont forget: all your successes, and all your failures are the result of your actions and your actions only. You exist in a vacuum.
51.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
There's really not as much of a logical connection between the two as you think. Replace "fly on a private jet" with any other rich person activity and your sentence still works. So it's not really about flying on a jet.
52.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
Call it a (rare) creative whim!
53.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
"keep smiling as the boot continues to crush your face and breaking your jaw" Optimism is a trademark feature of a population untouched by traumas of war or famine (how many wars were fought on American soil? Would you say America
54.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
Dirt rich is untouched money. Collected for the sake of it. Filthy is what you get once you've touched it enough.
55.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
If you turn off shadows in cs you're putting yourself at a significant disadvantage. Many games have been clinched on a shadow that was noticed.
56.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
Education wasn't always solely or even mainly about earning credentials. It's only when industry offset their responsibilities to train new employees to universities (and thus the taxpayer in publicly funded education), that sudde
57.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
> But the ickiness of attention-seeking and going for the lowest common denominator really makes it hard for me to keep it up. Attention-seeking, fine, but lowest common denominator is a self-defeating assumption. If my thing was making
58.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
> Everybody writing more in principle /should/ reduce coordination barriers which pushes out the boundary of Largest Useful Group Size for any system of coordinating. LargestUsefulGroupSize is already way underfilled due to the
59.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
Perhaps your reaction to the test is part of the test too. If you do it, you'll be evaluated on your technical performance, and if you refuse you've simply answered another question they might have about you, albeit a non-technica
60.
by nebulousthree 4y ago
It would be only a matter of time before a non-human would be found out for not understanding how to relate to a human fact-of-life.

More ›