neatze

8 ms·

31.
by neatze 3y ago
There is also minipupper2[1] (I have minipupper1, waiting for version2), v2 has servos feedback (I think this first of kind in cheapest robots space), furthermore all minipupper1 hardware is also open-sourced on github[2], it is expected to
32.
by neatze 3y ago
It could be because people are selling there's accounts in protest.
33.
by neatze 3y ago
Is it unethical (stupid) to sell your reddit account(s), instead of deleting them, to maximize effects of protest?
34.
by neatze 3y ago
This type of self driving existed since 90's, as far I understand hard part is driving in traffic and pedestrians.
35.
by neatze 3y ago
I am not sure how to go about it, one way would be is to prompt it as MDP (seems like not fair), another way just prompt only as movies history (eg. I guess GPT will have to learn some form of MDP representation). Most interesting aspect to
36.
by neatze 3y ago
> zero ability to do language modeling If I am reading this correctly; then who invented/discovered attention networks ?
37.
by neatze 3y ago
This claim does not make sense, transformer networks in my limited experience are limited in there learning ability (fine tuning), furthermore there planning abilities are non-existent.
38.
by neatze 3y ago
> clearly don’t have if you’ve looked at lots of gpt4 examples for example, can you fine tune GPT to play chess at ELO 1600 ? If you don't know answer, you are in for surprise.
39.
by neatze 3y ago
Probably, it is best training data you can get, since model was "tricked" to contradict prompt's request.
40.
by neatze 3y ago
Well according to some, GPT (transformer networks) already solved it all, lmao
41.
by neatze 3y ago
Since I learned about deep mind, I expected they would dominate RoboCup, but I really don't understand why they don't.
42.
by neatze 3y ago
Changes in gold reserves are missing from chart too.
43.
by neatze 3y ago
There was announcement about Deepmind joining RoboCup competition ?
44.
by neatze 3y ago
I guess I fail to see how this is relevant to current and future military technology, where name of the game is stealth, high precision, range, speed, and intelligence, and not in any way about building large number of bombs/cannons th
45.
by neatze 3y ago
Seems like you misunderstood, it is not about ethics/justification to wage the war, but only about use of technology in violent conflicts.
46.
by neatze 3y ago
> It wasn't a technological issue. Precision guided munition is 90's technology, this removes any need/justification to carpet bomb anything, today even artillery shells are guided (is in biggest, longest range guns have a
47.
by neatze 3y ago
This is almost like arguing that ISIS inflicted civilian casualties are only due to US air strikes, because it reads to me like you are arguing that Iraqi civilian casualties are not due to unimaginable number of IED's in civilian popu
48.
by neatze 3y ago
Current state of nuclear threat is not even remotely comparable to Cuban Missile Crisis.
49.
by neatze 3y ago
No one here said that war is NOT hell, what exactly are you trying to say?
50.
by neatze 3y ago
I am not aware of any theory that would suggest humans in forcible future will eradicate violent conflicts, regarding past there is great book; War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage
51.
by neatze 3y ago
It is really hard, if not impossible to compare civilian causalities directly effected by weapon systems, no two wars are same, not all wars culminated within urban area(s), parties in conflict use different weapons systems, and engagement
52.
by neatze 3y ago
Are you arguing that war without modern technology had less civilian casualties ?
53.
by neatze 3y ago
What makes you think I did not try, simply fail to see why/how natural language inconstant comprehension in any way equates to human or any other animal behavior, I simply don't believe/see (subjectively) that any potential o
54.
by neatze 3y ago
The line already drawn, no indiscriminate killings of civilians, all this technology only minimizes civilian suffering, furthermore it is more humane to use terminators instead of 20 years olds clearing buildings and autonomous tanks/t
55.
by neatze 3y ago
“The idea that this stuff could actually get smarter than people — a few people believed that,” said Hinton to the NYT. “But most people thought it was way off. And I thought it was way off. I thought it was 30 to 50 years or even longer aw
56.
Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor?(journals.plos.org)
2 points by neatze 3y ago|0 comments
57.
by neatze 3y ago
This felt like someone intercepted my inner dialog during prototype development.
58.
by neatze 3y ago
How does expansion of universe increases total energy ? If anything seems like due to dark energy total energy dissipation per area is increasing until death of universe.
59.
by neatze 3y ago
This does not compute in my mind, energy transfer (in some form) it is observed phenomena (my understanding (primitive) of time is energy transfer), even on quantum level we can measure it, what am I missing ?
60.
by neatze 3y ago
furthermore, so far in universe (after big bang), nothing is really created, only transformed.

More ›