Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nearestneighbor
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
91.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
16y ago
I'd hate Apple more if they published a policy, and then cherry-picked when to enforce it for their best PR benefit.
92.
▲
Thrust - an STL-like library for CUDA
(code.google.com)
2 points
by
nearestneighbor
16y ago
|
0 comments
93.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
So they didn't value you there, but got angry when you quit?
94.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
> "vision" of a lisp-centric improved version of unix fell by the wayside Dogbert would say: I like stories in which visions meet reality. P.S. What was it about the new contract that made you quit, and why didn't you look for a job bef
95.
▲
Children who form no racial stereotypes found (Brain disorder...)
(nature.com)
3 points
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
|
0 comments
96.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
Arnold may not have been in space (yet), but he was one of the very few to come back through time.
97.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
One of the pitfalls of tabbed browsing.
98.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
My prediction: "The version number finally equals Pi. No more changes to the software are possible, because it's now perfect."
99.
▲
Eric Leebow (freezecrowd): I am free enterprise
(youtube.com)
16 points
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
|
12 comments
100.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
I know all this, as I've been using Debian/Ubuntu for years, but I think that far fewer people are using Debian now than Ubuntu, resulting in less testing. Developers probably migrated as well. People vote with their feet.
101.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
I didn't do any statistical survey of thousands of users, but I am using Debian5 and Ubuntu8.04. The former feels and acts considerably more broken, in my experience. This is in addition to being more pain to install. Just my $0.02.
102.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
Are you saying that other Linux distributions are better? It used to be that Debian was more solid, but I don't think this is the case any more.
103.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
Flip to the part about longjmp, and see if you still are.
104.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
And how do you define "loss" and "gains" for market players? PS: Your definition appears to be "you lost iff you left with less money than when you came in". OTOH, my definition is "you lost iff you made less money than if you would have if
105.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
Are those slots in the same rack auctioned or something? How does having an office in a nearby building help?
106.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
> Who lost on this? Market players who didn't invest in your idea (you could call it "opportunity cost"). If the baseline strategy is "invest randomly", or "invest a little bit in everything", then those who deviated from it by way of n
107.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
Are there no hosting / cloud services for this sort of thing?
108.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
I think what you are saying is that if everyone invested very intelligently, then everyone would be better off, as more money would pour into the more viable ventures (is this what you mean?) I can agree with that, FWIW, but from the short-
109.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
IAMA thread looks very interesting, thanks (although you never know when it's someone pretending to be something he's not). I'm a bit skeptical of algodeal. If they are seriously doing this (actually licensing strategies and following them)
110.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
Is this relevant to LLCs?
111.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
Relative to the average market performance , making choices as to what to invest in, seems to be a zero-sum game (by definition, as the net total performance of the investments will be average), but I'm not a finance guru, so feel free to
112.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
I guess I meant excluding human labor (imagine that a bunch of programmers, etc. with the necessary skills wanted to do it). Would they need to rent a building next to the NYSE and put the machines there?
113.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
> why should you do better? It's a zero sum game, but one might be smarter than others. Some companies doing algorithmic trading consistently skim off their share of the market's inefficiencies. What I'm wondering is how much of an inve
114.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/bm1u8/safe_robu... Ironic, considering the title, if you ask me.
115.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
Some people love math and algorithms, and hate web/GUI/iPhone programming.
116.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
What books do you recommend?
117.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
That's not me.
118.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
http://www.dqd.com/~mayoff/images/alfa.jpg
119.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
"I hope you don't judge me by this strength of mine, I'm actually an OK guy" - how does that parse :-P
120.
▲
by
nearestneighbor
17y ago
I just realized that your comment was ambiguous.
More ›