nearbuy

7 ms·

91.
by nearbuy 7mo ago
It has nothing to do with circular reasoning or my personal opinions. You can choose to define general intelligence in a way that excludes regular people if you like, but then you'd be using a weird definition that differs from how 99.
92.
by nearbuy 7mo ago
They would score much worse on the private set than the public set. And they haven't done this for any of the other ARC-AGI benchmarks, so why would they do it for this one?
93.
by nearbuy 7mo ago
> Not true. It's certainly true. By definition. If the bar for general intelligence is being smarter than the median human, 50% of people won't reach the threshold for general intelligence. (And if the bar is beating the median
94.
by nearbuy 7mo ago
That's their claim for how much less economic activity Iran (not just the government) had in total due to sanctions, not how much the government "spent on the nuclear weapons program" that could have instead been spent on des
95.
by nearbuy 7mo ago
Even dumb humans are considered to have general intelligence. If the bar is having to outdo the median human, then 50% of humans don't have general intelligence.
96.
by nearbuy 7mo ago
It can't be 2T USD. That's about 60 times the cost of the Manhattan project in today's dollars. It could maybe be 2T Iranian rials.
97.
by nearbuy 7mo ago
> This gives it the ability to approximate multiplication problems it hasn't seen before. More than approximate. It straight up knows the algorithms and will do arbitrarily long multiplications correctly. (Within reason. Obviously i
98.
by nearbuy 7mo ago
The author is partly right here. If those values are ints, you'll get something like this: sar eax, 0x1f and eax, 7 add eax, edx sar eax, 3 You get 4 instructions instead of one because value >> 3 rounds towards nega
99.
by nearbuy 7mo ago
Wikipedia says it "had the highest opening for a non-concert documentary since the $10.7 million opening for Chimpanzee (2012)". It did well by documentary standards, poorly compared to its budget, and the stories about empty thea
100.
by nearbuy 7mo ago
If someone has heart rate of 150 during an interview, it's most likely anxiety.
101.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
It's probably not great for this. Resting heart rate is correlated with fitness, but candidates can be nervous during interviews which can drastically change their heart rate. You'd probably be able to make better guesses about th
102.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
I don't know any commercial uses of such tech today . I'm not saying they don't exist. I just don't know of them. I had said I don't think it's very useful for "manipulating and profiling people over vide
103.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
This tech (detecting pulse from regular video) has been around almost 20 years now, and this doesn't seemed to have happened yet. You see this type of thing in spy movies, but I'm not sure it's that useful in real life. You&#
104.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
That's pretty close to what they have. They just named them Instant, Thinking (Standard), and Thinking (Extended), and they're discrete presets instead of a slider.
105.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
Just because bus lanes are beneficial where feasible doesn't mean optimizing the number of bus stops isn't also beneficial. Clearly it's possible for there to be too many bus stops. You wouldn't put a bus stop every 30 f
106.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
> "The emergency lights and markings of the victims’ vehicles would have been clearly visible to the soldiers at the time of the attacks." -> speculative. The soldiers argued they were wearing night vision equipment and did
107.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
If you didn't forget about the RLHF, your comment is oddly pedantic, confusing and misleading. "Correct and satisfying answers" is roughly the loss function for RLHF, assuming the humans favor satisfying answers, and using &q
108.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
You're kidding yourself if you think you can make TNT from the 3 sentences Wikipedia has on the two-step process with no chemistry background. (And even moreso if you attempt the industrial process instead.) This isn't nearly as s
109.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
Autopilot in planes does not handle takeoff. Pilots still do that. Traditional autopilot was mostly just to keep the plane flying straight. Capabilities have improved over time, but it still doesn't fly the plane the way Waymo drives i
110.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
> Wikipedia has quite detailed description of all the manufacture of all the popular bombs you can think of. Did you bother to check? It contains very high level overviews of how various explosives are manufactured, but no proper instruc
111.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
The parent comment probably forgot about the RLHF (reinforcement learning) where predicting the next token from reference text is no longer the goal. But even regular next token prediction doesn't necessarily preclude it from also lear
112.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
Claude was used by the US military in the Venezuela raid where they captured Maduro. [1] Without safety features, an LLM could also help plan a terrorist attack. A smart, competent terrorist can plan a successful attack without help from Cl
113.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
Were you talking about the "Mary had a little..." example? If not, I have no idea what you're trying to say.
114.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
If you ask a bunch of people the same question in a context where they aren't expecting a trick question, some of them will say walk. LLMs sometimes say walk, and sometimes say drive. Maybe LLMs fall for these kinds of tricks more ofte
115.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
If there is no response it could give that will disprove your point, then your belief is unfalsifiable and your point is meaningless.
116.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
I think part of the failure is that it has this helpful assistant personality that's a bit too eager to give you the benefit of the doubt. It tries to interpret your prompt as reasonable if it can. It can interpret it as you just wanti
117.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
That's not what they said. They said: > It's evaluation function simply returned the word "Most" as being the most likely first word in similar sentences it was trained on. Which is false under any reasonable interpre
118.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
The Google snippet isn't outdated. It's from the <meta> tag. It's still there, and it still says "Introducing GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark—our first real-time coding model. 15x faster generation, 128k context, now in resear
119.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
Unless I'm missing it, the page they're referring to ( https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-3-codex-spark/ ) never claims Spark is 15x faster. It looks like it only appears in the snippet the Google
120.
by nearbuy 8mo ago
I'm not doubting that we can choose a rate for the living wage. I'm asking about the sentence I quoted. What makes the living wage the "true cost" of labor? Why consider it to be a cost that private industry should right

More ›