ncallaway

9 ms·

121.
by ncallaway 10mo ago
> war crimes actually illegal. To be clear, war crimes are illegal here. They can carry the death penalty. I think there's a strong case to be made for Pete Hegseth to be executed for his crimes, according to US Law. But you'
122.
by ncallaway 10mo ago
The fact that it didn't happen for the those previous administrations is why it's happening again now. If those previous administrations had been tried for their various crimes, and the guilty parties were cooling their heels in a
123.
by ncallaway 10mo ago
> Should that administration be brought before the Hague? Yes.
124.
by ncallaway 10mo ago
Every war criminal should be arrested, and tried. I think they should also be hanged, but they generally don't do executions at the Hague is my understanding.
125.
by ncallaway 10mo ago
As a westerner, who believes in the rules based order, I would give anything for our leadership which is launching this illegal war to be sent to the Hague. Our leadership are war criminals, and should be treated as such. Some, specifically
126.
by ncallaway 10mo ago
Obviously I disagree. The parent specifically noted that generally "people keep asking AI coding tools to be something other than what they currently are." There's an explanation for why that is happening, so I think it'
127.
by ncallaway 10mo ago
> People keep asking AI coding tools to be something other than what they currently are. I think it's for a very reasonable reason: the AI coding tool salespeople are often selling the tools as something other than what they curre
128.
by ncallaway 10mo ago
> It's a plugin that I'm not using, don't care about using, and cannot see any conceivable use for. > No-one wants this. So, fun fact about earth: there are lots of people on it, and some of those people aren't you
129.
by ncallaway 10mo ago
> his written output could’ve been improved by running it through an AI tool. I mean, it could've been homogonized by running it through an AI tool. I don't think there's a guarantee that it would've been an improveme
130.
by ncallaway 11mo ago
> You didn't state reasons why not being a social platform matters here. The network effects matter so much more for a social platform than a chat bot. The switching costs for a user are much lower, so users can move to a differ
131.
by ncallaway 11mo ago
On the LTT video he also said that Valve had claimed to have tested with a small number of devices in the same room, but hadn’t tried out larger scenarios like tens of devices. My guess based on that is you likely dont need to totally clear
132.
by ncallaway 11mo ago
> Self driving cars need to actually deal with vision Doesn't ATC also need to actually deal with vision?
133.
by ncallaway 1y ago
Isn't that basically what the Matter protocol is?
134.
by ncallaway 1y ago
This is the biggest reason why I look for Matter-compatible smart home devices. It means I can put them on a locked down network, with no internet access, and I know at least the Matter supported compatibility will function offline. I think
135.
by ncallaway 1y ago
They didn't resign. They turned in their badges that allows them to access certain spaces in the pentagon. They're still reporters, they still work for their employers, and they can still do reporting.
136.
by ncallaway 1y ago
> we could have computer systems that can open chrome, start a video chat with somebody, go back and forth for a while to achieve a task, then hang up... with the person on the other end ever knowing they were dealing with a computer ins
137.
by ncallaway 1y ago
And? Do you want me to memorize the management and organizational structure of every website that I use? I am perfectly capable of using this site and not giving a flying shit about the CEO of YCombinator
138.
by ncallaway 1y ago
Yep, it's clearly deliberate. It's also annoying enough that I'm not reading the text of the blog. I hope the author doesn't have any point beyond: "it's annoying to disable text selection"
139.
by ncallaway 1y ago
As with others, I think your "and/or" between government and "big tech" is problematic. I think government censorship should be strictly prohibited. I think "company" censorship is just the application of
140.
by ncallaway 1y ago
Dr. Oz held a significant investment in iHerb. iHerb does sell folinic acid: https://www.iherb.com/pr/california-gold-nutrition-folinic-a...
141.
by ncallaway 1y ago
I know there’s already been a fair amount of discussion on this topic, but I appreciate Masnick’s takes on 1A issues. I thought this commentary did a good job focusing on how the government threatened individual parties involved to obtain t
142.
by ncallaway 1y ago
That's why the mens rea element is also an element of the crime. You've completely skipped over that part of the report and the conclusion.
143.
by ncallaway 1y ago
> posting on a YC forum over other forums due to them supporting or having an interest in YC. I've been posting here for over a decade, and I have absolutely no interest in YC in any way, other than a general strong negative sentime
144.
by ncallaway 1y ago
> rather than any immediate concern over loss of income etc. I don't know if that's necessarily true. Apparently there's not a significant loss of revenue _from YouTube_ from the reports of these creators. But some sponsor
145.
by ncallaway 1y ago
> as long as there's a new new thing to replace it as the aspirational vehicle. Like any good mark in a con game, tech investors want to believe. Yea, but it seems like the new new thing needs to get progressively bigger with ea
146.
by ncallaway 1y ago
> Many businesses are rushing to put out something that fits the MCP standard but not taking the time to produce something that lets an LLM achieve things with their tool I think they'll have a while where they can get away with thi
147.
by ncallaway 1y ago
Is the filtering and processing very specific to the data set? I'd kind of assume that they would dump data into the data warehouse on September 2024, then in parallel continue data collection and do the months of work to determine how
148.
by ncallaway 1y ago
> When you point out that the LLM does not know the number of R's in the word "Strawberry", you are not exposing the LLM as some kind of sham, you're just admitting to being a fool. I'm sorry but that's not
149.
by ncallaway 1y ago
I mean, that's exactly what the first amendment of the United States Constitution is. It's a codification of a specific restriction on government power. Should it be able to be overturned by a minority of the population?
150.
by ncallaway 1y ago
I mean, that's basically what happens. The "lost her case" language is very much a public narrative around the court case, but from the legal perspective, her suit was dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction, which is pretty m

More ›