Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
natmaka
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
151.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Did you use imapsync? https://imapsync.lamiral.info/
152.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
I'm reminded of Manitou-Mail, a daily-driver powerful PostgreSQL-based dedicated mail client, quite robust and powerful. https://www.manitou-mail.org/
153.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> I've been hearing optimistic predictions around hydrogen Fair point, same here (I was born in 1967), however fossil fuels are so effective and adequate as energy sources, as long as we ignored/neglected their dubious effect o
154.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Facts: Superphénix was a prototype. It didn't reach its goal (reaching the industrial stage). Not a single model of breeder reactor reached it. Mentioning its high availability rate neglects planned shutdowns (planning enough of them
155.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
The connection is that "it will also have natural gas capacity" seems false to me as backup turbo-alternators can 'burn' hydrogen ( => no natural gas capacity). > hydrogen > contributes less than a rounding erro
156.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Hydrogen is already used in many industrial processes (~1e8 metric tons/year), including turbo-alternators, while there is not a single ready-to-be-built model of industrial breeder reactor.
157.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> Whether your grid has nuclear or renewables, it will also have natural gas capacity. No, turbo-alternators 'burning' hydrogen do exist. And green hydrogen (produced by renewables) is cheaper than pink hydrogen (produced by a
158.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> proven technology with excellent safety record The real long-term effect of past nuclear accidents is a subject of debate, and the potential worst case a concern for all. > the only power generation that has a completely closed fuel
159.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Is TMI up and running? On the other side: https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/micros...
160.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
When it comes to building nuclear plants China is, by far, the pack leader. However its results are dwarfed by the results of its renewables projects: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/electricity-fossil-renewa...
161.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Indeed, however it was deemed way more convincing by more and more people after each nuclear accident.
162.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Nuclear ELECTRICITY, not 'energy'! In France about 60% of final energy is produced thanks to fossil fuel. Moreover the cost of this 'nuclearization' was huge (France debt is abyssal, and taxes are very high) Details: ht
163.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Because, for now, those non-nuclear-capable states weren't interested in becoming nuclear-capable. On a standard PWR (the most common type of civilian industrial reactor) cooking military-grade plutonium is easy: charge it, let it sta
164.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
The IEEFA isn't enthusiastic: https://ieefa.org/resources/small-modular-reactors-still-too...
165.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Recyclable blades are gaining traction: RecyclableBlade, ZEBRA, PECAN... There even are efforts to recycle existing ones: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2023/02/08/newly-discovered-che... In most advanced natio
166.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
There is an official report detailing why the project in France (the Flamanville-3 EPR) failed, published at (French ahead!) https://www.economie.gouv.fr/rapport-epr-flamanville , and regulations aren't a major cause (
167.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
The Ohio nuclear bribery scandal is another case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_nuclear_bribery_scandal Yes, even in South Korea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Korean_nuclear_scandal
168.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Nobody knows for sure, but the sole nuclear accident cleanup operations may cost $470 to $660 billion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_nuclear_accident_cle...
169.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> Automated VACUUM ANALYZE operations scheduled via pgcron targeting write-heavy tables Why don't you set (per table) the autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor parameter (or autovacuum_analyze_threshold) then let AUTOVACUUM handle this?
170.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Heraclitus summarized it 25 centuries ago: “No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man.”
171.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Did you ensure that this cat didn't try elsewhere, first? Hypothesis: you have (or had) at least a cat at home, while your neighbors didn't, and a cat showing up on your front porch may think "better here because at least a
172.
▲
by
natmaka
2y ago
Is the load factor of those Japanese machines similar to those used in the US? Isn't life expectancy multifactorial?
173.
▲
by
natmaka
2y ago
Simplification leads to automation, which is one of the main factor of efficiency. Means goal and end goal... Efficiency is always at odds with robustness, and it may be the ultimate challenge. Some Japanese firms may also have adopted ole
174.
▲
by
natmaka
2y ago
> still a far cry from fossils related deaths The question is not "which amount of fossil fuel, which amount of nuclear?" but about renewables and nuclear. >> Because those who refuse to be exposed to induced risks can pr
175.
▲
by
natmaka
2y ago
> the worst nuclear reactor catastrophe killed ~30 people directly and ~5000 indirectly. This is highly debatable. A glimpse: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl:_Consequences_of_the... > Why do we accept car
176.
▲
by
natmaka
2y ago
David Osmond work is interesting. He wrote last week: "Each week I run a simulation of Australia’s main electricity grid using rescaled generation data to show that it can get very close to 100% renewable electricity with 24GW/12
177.
▲
by
natmaka
2y ago
Ében-Émael on Sea! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fort_%C3%89ben-%C3%8...
178.
▲
by
natmaka
2y ago
As clean as the Rocky Flats Plant! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_contamination_from...
179.
▲
by
natmaka
2y ago
Thanks to Lunar: https://www.debian.org/News/2024/20241119
180.
▲
by
natmaka
2y ago
Yes, this is abusive, however (back to our subject) AFAIK there is free media in Germany (TV, radio, newspapers...), and they enjoy a fair audience. Therefore in Germany public opinion isn't really managed by the government. A. Merkel
More ›