Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
natmaka
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
451.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
They dropped the ball on military investments (which were MASSIVE), see their report ( https://www.ccomptes.fr/en/documents/1134 ), page 35: «Le champ d’analyse ne couvre pas les dépenses de recherche relevant du
452.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
Indeed, and EV's batteries will become more and more significant ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle-to-grid ), as will the clean backup provided by green hydrogen (obtained thanks to electricity overproduced
453.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
> If the regulators 'like' what needs to be built it'll pop up fast The most dangerous and expensive accident happening to a wind turbine is way (way!!!) less daunting and way more easy to avoid and tackle than a major nuc
454.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
'Wish I could sign, but I have to have it signed on. Whining from time to time about it, with no result. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222044
455.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
It only fully plays on locally, under a unique (national) certification authority. Historically each nation nuclear certification authority developed its own set of requirements. There are links, and a push to federate efforts, however it r
456.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
This way of estimating the real total cost isn't realistic, in such a (military) context accounting is difficult. In France the supreme court of audit (Cour des comptes) simply dropped the ball on it and used ballpark figures. The rea
457.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
Not sure about this. For the Koreans (KEPCO) selling (even at a loss) their most recent nuclear plant (at Barakah) was vital because the Korean government then paused nuclear in Korea. Some shortcuts may have been useful ( https:/&#
458.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
No. The last reactor delivered by the French, before Olkiluoto-3, was Civaux-2 and it was delivered in 1999 (work started in 1991). Work on Olkiluoto-3 started in 2005.
459.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
During it's last year its capacity factor (.31) was way too low for an industrial reactor.
460.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
> we can agree to disagree on what "industrial" means. I think that the BN-800 reactor is an industrial reactor, just not a very good one. Fair enough. IMHO 'industrial' here (power-producing equipment) means "r
461.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
We already have excess green power (spot prices are sometimes 0 or even negative). There is (now) just not enough of it. However as renewables quickly ramp up there will be more and more of it.
462.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
Hydrogen will probably not happen for transportation, but it is a serious contender for power grid backup.
463.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
> I think it does qualify as an industrial Russia acknowledges BN-800 problems, doesn't want to deploy it, and postpones its successor (BN-1200) to 2035 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BN-1200_reactor ) while i
464.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
There is no industrial fast-neutron reactor, and therefore nothing (yet) to deploy. Superphenix, in France, never reached the industrial stage. Incidents-riddled, its best performance was, after 13 years, a .31 annual load factor.
465.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
The major factors are: France was massively less industrial than Germany, its industrial sector is way less developed than 30 years ago (not emitting is easy when you buy more imported goods), its GDP is quite lower, its climate warmer.
466.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
> Storage will not complete anything in time to be useful You have a case here, however this is even truer for nuclear reactors, especially considering the known uranium reserves (max 2 hundred years for the existing fleet). Hydro: yes,
467.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
The BN-800 didn't reach industrial stage. Moreover it only runs MOX now (far from a complete closed cycle), just as many classic REP do (for example in France). It has problems and there is no plan to build another one: "problems
468.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
> The Fukushima evacuation was wholly unnecessary During such a disaster very few are able to assess the real risk, in real time, and even less to predict it. Panic ensues. This is intrinsic to the underlying physical and biological ph
469.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
This book is an analysis of scientific literature, and the authors pedigrees seem convincing to me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl:_Consequences_of_the... Most authors of negative critics are authors of report
470.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
Yes, the dose rate (and type of exposure, bioaccumulation of radioisotopes...) is one of (if not the) key parameter. As for its role the document I referenced seems pretty convincing to me.
471.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
> A single coal seam fire Nobody wants coal anymore, this is about renewables vs. nuclear. > A dam failure can even render an area uninhabitable forever Source?
472.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
LNT: the controversy rages over... in each direction. See for example: https://danielcorcos.substack.com/p/bca
473.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
The real amount of victims of nuclear accidents is hotly disputed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl:_Consequences_of_the... Fukushima: more than 2200 victims from the evacuation https://en.wikipedia.
474.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
There is no industrial breeder reactor, albeit many projects aiming at obtaining one burnt huge amount of resources for decades. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeder_reactor#Development_an...
475.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
> It takes anyone one minute to check ElectricityMap or an equivalent historical data source Those data are about the current fleet of wind turbines production, not sufficient when it comes to determine whether a continental-scale fleet
476.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
Electricity is less expensive in France than in Germany because the French taxpayer pays a higher share of the energy system. https://data.oecd.org/chart/7eRr
477.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
In France fossil fuels produce ~65% of final energy, and the project aiming at building the first instance of a series of reactors (EPR) planned in 2004 is a failure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_(nuclear_reactor)#
478.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
Moreover decommissioning a nuclear plant often is a nightmare (check U.-K.'s current program), and storing electricity needed during the night (for example in the car's battery) is easy and costs less and less. https://
479.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
My point was not about the nature of the political regime but about it's ways towards businesses: does it emits strong directives on all accounts/levels? My point is that, albeit there are perimeters strictly under its exclusive c
480.
▲
by
natmaka
3y ago
> prominent ex-president Hu Jintao > Covid > Taiwan My point was only about business (relationship between companies and the gov). > unofficial disappearances Apart from Jack Ma (I proposed an explanation), this list isn't
More ›