natch

60 ms·

871.
by natch 4y ago
Too bad. Small price to pay.
872.
by natch 4y ago
Top posting because this thread is full of talk about the owner giving permission to unlock. Wiping is the right concept here. Unlocking is not. Sure, yes, you need to unlock in order to wipe. Duh. But unlock is not sufficient to prevent ha
873.
by natch 4y ago
Ugh that would be horrible.
874.
by natch 4y ago
I get a ton of false positives. The tech is truly lame.
875.
by natch 4y ago
I don’t think ChatGPT is really needed here. Gmail’s spam filters are Google’s weakest tech. At least I don’t know of anything worse.
876.
by natch 4y ago
I guess we are talking past each other. You seem to be expressing perfectly valid conclusions based on the current state of RVs, and I am thinking about what will be possible in the future when instead of a gas or diesel tank, some RVs will
877.
by natch 4y ago
The headline and the heavy promotional verbiage on the site seems to be claiming this is some new functionality we didn’t have before. Image2image with text instructions isn’t new as the headline implies. InvokeAI (and a few other projects
878.
by natch 4y ago
What are you talking about. EVs can afford to have absolutely massive AC and heat for that matter because that big battery is multipurpose. Well big battery in good EVs at least, not in this prototype, but I’m sure they’ll up it if they do
879.
by natch 4y ago
1) a stab at a definition: groupthink Karenism with attempted (often successful) group enforcement 2) a stab at the opposite of woke: Live and let live Interestingly it’s not the opposite of conservative. It shares a lot of conservatism’s i
880.
by natch 4y ago
Woke != liberal. Very, very far from it.
881.
by natch 4y ago
I have nothing against Vice having strongly opinionated articles, but this article has really a wild take. It's true that conservatives are upset with what they are seeing, but so are liberals, by which I mean actual liberal thinkers,
882.
by natch 4y ago
Sure, technically, chronological ordering is an algorithm. I wonder what you would want. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
883.
by natch 4y ago
Elon is a fan of the chronological timeline, so I would take a pause there and consider. He even tweeted out instructions on how to switch to it and away from algorithmic.
884.
by natch 4y ago
To you maybe but not to me. Because I know that Gmail usage and behavior was functionally equivalent in beta to what it is in non beta. While FSD beta on the other hand has different usage and different behavior than what FSD will have if i
885.
by natch 4y ago
No, the drivers behind hurt themselves. There’s a whole discussion about all this in the thread.
886.
by natch 4y ago
I did watch the video. The Tesla had seven blinks of the turn signal, five of them before entering the lane. The car in the destination lane was at a safe distance for the Tesla to enter the lane, but it aggressively maintained its slightly
887.
by natch 4y ago
Flamebait headline. FSD does not yet exist. The point that the driver is responsible for their driving has already been made elsewhere in this thread. I’m not here to repeat that. Anyway it’s moot since any accident resulting is most likely
888.
by natch 4y ago
Is hydrogen cheap to transport, cheap to store, and cheap to use though? I thought making it was only a small part of the problems with hydrogen.
889.
by natch 4y ago
The future is not exclusively electric. The future will have a mix of technologies appropriate for different situations. We are still going to have horses and gas vehicles just as we do now, with EVs alongside them.
890.
by natch 4y ago
Just ask it to draw two armed pianists and it will happily generate scads of three armed ones.
891.
by natch 4y ago
There was an article recently about the amazing optical stabilization of some higher end Canon models: https://www.theverge.com/23523047/canon-image-stabilized-bin... That being said I would be wary of recommendations
892.
by natch 4y ago
Eww, no.
893.
by natch 4y ago
In the longer timeframe of frequent large-scale Mars travel we will have humans and transhumans and human successor robots with different body plans that are more adaptable to the Mars environment. Any article on this topic that is not buil
894.
by natch 4y ago
> The ban is for the term "Full Self-Driving", not "Autopilot" ... and even then only when used without disclaimers and explanations about what to expect. Which Tesla provides in spades. As any owner who has pre-paid
895.
by natch 4y ago
Of course.
896.
by natch 4y ago
The quality of the discussion here in this thread is just pathetic. Dang is this what HN has become?
897.
by natch 4y ago
False. Tesla data sharing is opt in only and the car works fine when sharing is not enabled, the default.
898.
by natch 4y ago
Agree. And improved efficiency in the car itself as well.
899.
by natch 4y ago
It actually is better for the environment to run an EV off of even something as dirty as coal power, than to run a gasoline car because the EV drivetrain is so much more efficient. That being said, I agree of course that transitioning the m
900.
by natch 4y ago
What this misses — and every other article I’ve seen about naming misses — is that the truly hard part of good naming is none is the stuff that was mentioned. The hard part is this: taking the deserved level of care with naming often has to

More ›