nash

9 ms·

61.
by nash 17y ago
Antibiotics is sad. For lasers I'd be willing to bet a bit of confusion (ie yes, lasers are focused waves... See something WAVE, click WAVE). Overall result is depressing though.
62.
by nash 17y ago
This must be a different Sydney to the one I'm in...
63.
by nash 17y ago
I'd agree with the two bin related ones. The stairs I think may have more staying power. The question all videos need answer is what are the usage ratios 6 months later.
64.
by nash 17y ago
I was going to ask is does this mean the wolframalfail own all your source code? But I'm thinking the 6/c a query thing means it's all moot.
65.
by nash 17y ago
Did you read the FIRST post in the issue tracker? http://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/msg5911 He is shipping binary only versions of a modified version of ffmpeg. He needs to comply with the licence for that code, which (vastly simp
66.
by nash 17y ago
Maybe I'm just biased (as a OSS developer who has had my software ripped off), but I don't see he is trying to fix the problem. His first comment on the issue essentially was: "It does not violiate license of FFmpeg." Personally I'd be m
67.
by nash 17y ago
In fact, if it does come to a legal situation, it may be detrimental to them if they do.
68.
by nash 17y ago
The MediaCoder author would be a great example of such a person. If the author of MediaCoder uses someone else's software, it's quite reasonable he obeys their rules for that software. He obvisously didn't read the licence for the software