naringas

36 ms·

1. 301.▲
   by naringas 7y ago

   hmm, I think that in this particular case ignoring it will make it go away.. because in the end, the problem is that people pay attention to it. suppose nobody paid attention to such content in the first place, would it really be a problem
2. 302.▲
   by naringas 7y ago

   seems to me like subcultural-ideology (frankly puerile and overly simplistic) intended to set-up a more robust (still) unrepresented ideology summed up as "just do what the algoritm/computer system tells you to do". i.e. the
3. 303.▲
   by naringas 7y ago

   I mean modern broadcast television, the one with ads
4. 304.▲
   by naringas 7y ago

   > consuming and processing narrative is not entirely passive. while I agree with this, modern television requires far less "interaction on the receiving end" than you give it credit for. It lacks novelty.
5. 305.▲
   by naringas 7y ago

   > but something involving probability will be part of it quantum mechanics without the physics?
6. 306.▲
   by naringas 7y ago

   so that's why I have been getting so many privacy policy updates
7. 307.▲
   by naringas 7y ago

   rome?
8. 308.▲
   by naringas 7y ago

   > The presumption you're making is that a country would never spend money for the public good I have just realized that I assume this to be the case. If a government ever does that is simply a collateral effect of their main purpose
9. 309.▲
   by naringas 7y ago

   It's very similiar to running a casino
10. 310.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    Does doing something seriously evil necessarily imply secrecy? I am thinking it might but I am not exactly sure why I think this. Ae there examples of evil things (known to be evil at their time) done in a widely public way? On the other ha
11. 311.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    python is not ill-designed desgined at all
12. 312.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    [quietly whispers] sssh... reader mode
13. 313.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    to use the language of this [1]; I agree, I get a strong sense of "posturetalk" [1] https://www.ribbonfarm.com/the-gervais-principle/
14. 314.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernormal_stimulus
15. 315.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    I wish I could do that on KDE plasma
16. 316.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    part of the reason the so-caleld "average Joe" doesn't remember what squared means is becuase they don't really have to. If this scheme were part of the world form the minute "Joe" is born, Joe would have to
17. 317.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    ...and then get them before they choose to dissent
18. 318.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    classic mitchell and webb sketch https://youtu.be/hn1VxaMEjRU
19. 319.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    live well another day?
20. 320.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    Copyright is a concept from an earlier era when copying something required both, a somewhat unwieldy machine, and a physical object for each copy. indeed, ownership is already about who has rights but it is also limited by the nature of wha
21. 321.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    but it will improve the ability to obfuscate webpages
22. 322.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    welcome to the web 2.0 cooming soon: web assemply web 3.0 which (I fear) might feel a lot like flash web pages from the early 00s. I hope I'm wrong.
23. 323.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    maybe he has recently... but he is one of the founders of it.
24. 324.▲
    Taboo(en.wikipedia.org)

    1 points by naringas 7y ago|0 comments
25. 325.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    Actually, replace with 'google'. Facebook did say they would permit political advertising without fact checking. Whereas google said they would enforce factualness
26. 326.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    In a way he is blaming the paper (social media) for what people write on it. Social media merely enable our worst to come out. But it doesn't cause it. The solution is not censorship. But to somehow make it so that people see through t
27. 327.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    I've started to think that we, as individual humans, are far more of a statistical phenomenon than we would like. I predict that at some point, once the mathematics have been distilled out from quantum mechanics, and extended to n-dime
28. 328.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    > who is to blame if a hipster falls down a chute 50 feet onto concrete? Why wouldn't it be the hipster's fault?
29. 329.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    no, as fas as I understand, these banks are directly part of their governments. Whereas a typical central bank is independent and autonomous.
30. 330.▲
    by naringas 7y ago

    Iran's national bank, is as far as I know, not independent from Iran's government. Just like Bolivia's, Venezuela's, Cuba's, and North Korea's. Saddam's Iraq also used to be like that before w. bush waged