nanny

19 ms·

121.
by nanny 11y ago
http://youpronounce.it/search.jsp?q=gif 1) hard g 2) hard g 3) hard g 4) hard g 5) I closed the tab The concept and implementation are pretty neat, at least.
122.
by nanny 11y ago
>I CALLED TOP FIRST! We'll never know for sure. There have been many times where I'll type in chat: "top", my message will appear, and then somebody else will say "top" immediately after. But, a asking a thi
123.
by nanny 11y ago
>If you take my life you owe my family my life How does executing your murderer return your life to your family?
124.
by nanny 11y ago
Neat. Why would I use this over ClojureScript or Parenscript?
125.
by nanny 11y ago
Nope: https://status.github.com/messages
126.
by nanny 11y ago
>I don't know why the functional people couldn't stick with things I already know -- obvious symbols like ++ and != and easy concepts such as "inheritance" and "polymorphism". This is the most poignant line,
127.
by nanny 11y ago
The "use the imperative mood" trope has gotten completely out of hand, and the "If applied, this commit will ..." argument is entirely nonsensical. You can slightly adjust the lead-in and make the same exact argument for
128.
by nanny 11y ago
>Sometimes, fixing a single bug ,adding a single feature requires the edition of multiple files Congrats, that's one atomic change. He didn't say "one commit per file change", he said "one commit per atomic chang
129.
by nanny 11y ago
Just remove it entirely already, it's nearly unusable on my desktop now, and it was bad before.
130.
by nanny 11y ago
Are you kidding? So what if he's an engineer? The guy's a lunatic and this is nothing more than some weird publicity stunt. It's a cry for attention, nothing more. This whole race has become a circus.
131.
by nanny 11y ago
Nice comment, especially your second paragraph. It's nearly exactly how I feel as well. What made you get back into Eclipse/Java?
132.
by nanny 11y ago
>by adding lots of salt Proving your point that this is non-obvious even further, high salt intake may not actually be as harmful as common knowledge suggests: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp&#x2F
133.
by nanny 11y ago
Good on you. Don't be rude, but don't beat around the bush, and maybe someone will understand eventually.
134.
by nanny 11y ago
You're right, my phrasing was a bit misleading. It was just the most dramatic example of a "major change" I could think up.
135.
by nanny 11y ago
No big deal, it wasn't a slight against you, but rather the OP. It's not your fault he reposted your two year old benchmarks.
136.
by nanny 11y ago
I really can't imagine that this benchmark is relevant anymore. Haven't Go, D, and Erlang had major changes since then? E.g., Go is now compiled by a compiler written in Go.
137.
by nanny 11y ago
I think PHP already comes with enough of this kind of stuff built-in.
138.
by nanny 11y ago
Try the Magit package for Emacs [1]. You don't have to know (much) Emacs to use it, and it's a really great client. [1]: https://github.com/magit/magit
139.
by nanny 11y ago
I disagree. Would it be accurate to call The GitLab Enterprise Edition "open source"? If not, what would you call it?
140.
by nanny 11y ago
People just hate when you correct their semantics, don't take it personally. Many people also don't know the difference between free and open. Here's a popular article by RMS which explains the difference: http://w
141.
by nanny 11y ago
That's not the definition of "open source", that's the definition of "free software". As you can see by this very article, "open" and "free" are not the same. http://www.gnu.org&#
142.
by nanny 11y ago
Some context: The CEO and President of Nintendo, Satoru Iwata, passed away recently. He is credited with saving EarthBound from cancellation by joining the programming team.
143.
by nanny 11y ago
Did you really just steal a reddit comment and make it into a blog post? https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/3cvdq2/what_...
144.
by nanny 11y ago
>Bad communication. - they fire Victoria without telling IAMA moderators I asked for things that were already "on the camel's back". >Mods feel like they are volunteering for a for-profit company yet treated poorly. The
145.
by nanny 11y ago
Did you consider that it might not have been an option? That maybe it was an unexpected termination, and they didn't have a way to know about or contact the people arriving from out of town? You don't have enough information to sp
146.
by nanny 11y ago
>Corporate Reddit should have had a plan in place when they got rid of her, but as it became clear, they hadn't thought about it at all. What if she did something really bad and was fired on the spot? How could they "have a pla
147.
by nanny 11y ago
People keep saying things like this, but what exactly was on the camel's back in the first place? "Bad communication"? Can you give me any specific, concrete examples?
148.
by nanny 11y ago
When you consider exactly how much information we have to go on, I think people are overreacting by immense proportions. Do we even know why Victoria was fired yet? Maybe she was about to blow the lid off a vast internet conspiracy. Or mayb
149.
by nanny 11y ago
Honest question: why wouldn't someone want to use STL containers?
150.
by nanny 11y ago
Are you joking? Because I don't see how can you reply to my completely legitimate opinion with name-calling and pretend statistics about how you supposedly represent "95%" of HN and not be joking.

More ›