naiveattack

7 ms·

31.
by naiveattack 9y ago
Because this is one way of seeing security. If I have a private jet and runway, I can fly away when war breaks loose. Can you see the line?
32.
by naiveattack 9y ago
Sure, but this is the precariat. Most excellently pointed out be korrachs. This autonomy is the line. It doesn't have to be total anarchy or civil war either. Imagine food shortages or media propaganda or government policy changes. Aga
33.
by naiveattack 9y ago
Security is defined by some assumptions. The stability of society and the ability of the government to enforce that through the military and police. Very fragile the things we take for granted. When there systems fall, only those with eithe
34.
by naiveattack 9y ago
Where is the hoisting information in the npm lock file? The examples for yarn and npm look The same to me. Copied below: has-flag@^1.0.0: version "1.0.0" resolved " https://registry.yarnpkg.com/has-flag&#x2
35.
by naiveattack 9y ago
My comment was not an argument/direct analogy to the parent. They were a series of observations designed to illustrate a particular/contrasting point. Or rather an attempt to show where the boundaries lie in the grey of such thoug
36.
by naiveattack 9y ago
Yes, it is the relationship between them that makes this strange. The closeness.
37.
by naiveattack 9y ago
I invite you to point out a flaw in my observations. Sometimes it's good to be able to rationality ground your morality instead of merely feeling it. Guess which one will hold up when actually challenged in real life.
38.
by naiveattack 9y ago
I made no comment on whether it was or was not inexcusable. This isn't about what I believe is correct. Merely on the paradoxes and hypocrisy in this rather large stream of replies. What exactly makes it inexcusable to you though? The
39.
by naiveattack 9y ago
Take a homeless person and let them sleep in your kitchen in exchange for mowing your lawn -> moral hero. Build a mansion around this kitchen -> morally reprehensible It seems contrast in an unrelated area has confused the morally rig
40.
by naiveattack 9y ago
Here's a lay thought. The network must not have capacity to hold all the data. It must have a capacity proportional to the number of classes of data (instead of the number of samples). Another way to arrive at this may be: take a train