nachtigall

11 ms·

1. 61.▲
   $50,000 Bounty Posted by Education First for Mozilla WebRTC Issue(old.reddit.com)

   2 points by nachtigall 8y ago|1 comments
2. 62.▲
   Introducing the Accessibility Inspector in the Firefox Developer Tools(marcozehe.de)

   3 points by nachtigall 9y ago|0 comments
3. 63.▲
   Why do people dislike online ads?(ehsanakhgari.org)

   3 points by nachtigall 9y ago|0 comments
4. 64.▲
   Speeding Up `dwarfdump` with Rust(robert.ocallahan.org)

   3 points by nachtigall 9y ago|0 comments
5. 65.▲
   The Firefox Accounts authentication zoo(palant.de)

   4 points by nachtigall 9y ago|0 comments
6. 66.▲
   by nachtigall 9y ago

   Thanks I'll file a bug if I see it again on a GitHub page. In fact, the last days I haven't noticed it anymore on GitHub pages... But, of course as stated in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1404468#c43
7. 67.▲
   by nachtigall 9y ago

   > Sometimes I can even see "naked" plain text page for a moment, before styling is applied (ex: on GitHub pages. Yes, I've seen the same on GitHub. Note sure this is a GitHub or Firefox bug. (I use Nightly). Could you mayb
8. 68.▲
   by nachtigall 9y ago

   See, sibling post https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16647116 Please record a profile and report this.
9. 69.▲
   by nachtigall 9y ago

   Here's what I do in such situations: 1. Record a profile with the Gecko Profiler WebExtension (Install it from https://perf-html.io/ ) 2. Upload the profile to https://perf-html.io/ 3. Create a bug on
10. 70.▲
    Firefox Product Roadmap(wiki.mozilla.org)

    376 points by nachtigall 9y ago|217 comments
11. 71.▲
    What Happens when you Contribute, revisited(blog.humphd.org)

    2 points by nachtigall 9y ago|0 comments
12. 72.▲
    Alternatives to vertical tabs (browser)(agmweb.ca)

    1 points by nachtigall 9y ago|0 comments
13. 73.▲
    PfP: Pain-free Passwords(pfp.works)

    1 points by nachtigall 9y ago|0 comments
14. 74.▲
    The Rust 2018 Roadmap RFC(github.com)

    2 points by nachtigall 9y ago|0 comments
15. 75.▲
    Update on Pocket and Firefox Integration(blog.mozilla.org)

    75 points by nachtigall 9y ago|118 comments
16. 76.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    I wonder if and how Waterfox or Palemoon can keep up with these security issues? (Disclosure: I am a Firefox Nightly user)
17. 77.▲
    Pinky – an NES emulator written in Rust, compiled to WebAssembly(koute.github.io)

    3 points by nachtigall 9y ago|0 comments
18. 78.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    Have you looked at about:performance and also when you hit this, then create a perf profile using https://perf-html.io/ and submit it as a bug to bugzilla.mozilla.org. If possible do both using Nightly. In my experience the
19. 79.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    Yes :) all current browser engines have their roots in the Nineties (webkit is also based on KHTML). This is what WebRender (part of Servo) to be added to Firefox Quantum / Gecko will change.
20. 80.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    Totally in favor of this, but I hope Firefox will turn this into a test pilot experiment first: https://testpilot.firefox.com/experiments In order to gain information/feedback about the best UI for this before baking
21. 81.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    > you have to do weird css hacks to make it look seemless and hide the top tab bar is very disappointing Firefox plans to add an API for dynamically hiding the tabbar. You can follow progress here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
22. 82.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    Mind sharing the link to the bug? I'd like to follow it as I think it would be a good enhancement.
23. 83.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    I think you should open a bug report about this at bugzilla.mozilla.org I did the same for several feature requests or ideas and the firefox developers and community is very nice and responsive (I'd say most of my bug reports were fixe
24. 84.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    Looks like this has been fixed now: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1353319 If you grab Nightly (I've been using it for a year now for frontend development and my normal browsing and it's just fine) y
25. 85.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    This is the bug for this in case you are interested or want to follow progress: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=885508
26. 86.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    Just for completeness: * Firefox's Awesomebar (the address bar) is much more powerful. Whereas Chromes sends you to google mainly: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/awesome-bar-search-fire... * Tree Style
27. 87.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    With Tree Style Tabs plus the Awesome bar it is not a problem to handle and it's easy to get up to this number over the day.
28. 88.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    FWIW, Firefox is still number one in Germany (desktop only) which is not an to be underrated economy.
29. 89.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    > 3. Firefox also has completely separate profiles, in addition to container tabs. hey callahad, thanks for shiming in. My biggest pain with profiles is that you cannot use separate profiles at the same time. A Firefox instance can only
30. 90.▲
    by nachtigall 9y ago

    > you could run multiple Firefox instances with different profiles But not at the same time, which is a showstopper to me (still using Firefox Nightly as main browser).