n8m8

7 ms·

31.
by n8m8 1y ago
Good point. Has me thinking: In any field, over time, there's R&D for it to become more effective. How this progression might apply to marketing: 1. Printed ads, newspapers, billboards, magazines -- You can explain your product and
32.
by n8m8 1y ago
Creator here. This was inspired by a trivia game called Fallacy Quiz, but I kept thinking about how narcissists construct arguments to be circular, sometimes intentionally, sometimes not. The gimmick of this game is that you can't real
33.
Show HN: Narcissistic Abuse Simulator exposes toxic patterns(narcissisticabusesimulator.com)
2 points by n8m8 1y ago|3 comments
34.
by n8m8 1y ago
"protects the wrong entities (corporations instead of individuals who did the real work)" > laughs in Capitalism
35.
by n8m8 1y ago
Good point... how do moderation implementations actually work? They feel more like a separate supervising rigid model or even regex based -- this new feature is different, sounds like an MCP call that isn't very special. edit: Meant to
36.
by n8m8 1y ago
It seems more like they valued quantitative data in the form of A/B testing higher than their "vibe checks". The point I took away from the paper is in the context of LLMs, quantitative A/B testing isn't necessarily
37.
by n8m8 1y ago
I still hear hissing on many of the examples, has that improved?
38.
by n8m8 1y ago
You're not a luddite, they disclosed it because you're _supposed_ to take it with a grain of salt
39.
by n8m8 1y ago
That's it, I'm switching to linux for real this time
40.
by n8m8 1y ago
Amazon is known for a healthy culture around technical writing that I can attest to. This comment reflect my own thoughts, not of my company. Here's a public article considering it. https://quartr.com/insights/busi
41.
by n8m8 1y ago
Interesting idea, I think I'm on board with this correlation hypothesis. Obviously it's complicated, but it does seems like over-reliance on arbitrary opinions from average people would result in valuing "feeling" over c
42.
by n8m8 1y ago
Predictable, yet incredibly important.
43.
by n8m8 1y ago
inb4 someone genuinely doesn't understand why you wouldn't do this with an LLM
44.
by n8m8 2y ago
im on mobile and don’t have a pdf to test it with, but I love your styling and text copy.
45.
by n8m8 2y ago
I agree that especially with modern LLMs, I would avoid following patterns like this. Dedicated 2FA on a hardware device seems pretty resilient, I hope more banks incorporate it instead of SMS 2FA. Hosting vaultwarden also seems pretty good
46.
by n8m8 2y ago
I have similar gripes, but I still feel like on balance, randomizing passwords across accounts is more important. Selfhost vaultwarden ftw (or not — don’t f*ck it up)
47.
by n8m8 2y ago
Their comment made me laugh, agreed, open source is really is that big of a perk. IMO especially for something security-related (though 0day is always possible)
48.
by n8m8 2y ago
Thermal noise entropy is probably good enough for most practical uses, but it's still fundamentally producing a seed value that can be captured, misused, or bruteforced, right? Also curious if there are monte-carlo models looking at th