Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
n2d4
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
211.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
Actually, I think this benchmark did the right thing, that I wish more benchmarks would do. I'm much less interested in what the differences between compilers are than in what the actual output will be if I ask a professional Go or No
212.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
I'm biased but Stack Auth [0] is fully open-source, self-hostable, and we offer reasonably priced managed hosting, if that floats your boat. [0] https://github.com/stack-auth/stack
213.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
None — it's tag characters instead, which are used to represent emojis. But there's no difference! Either you can smuggle text in Unicode, or you can't. It's quite binary, and you don't gain advantages from having &
214.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
> Is this necessary to correctly represent human language? Yes! As soon as you have any invisible characters (eg. RTL or LTR marks, which are required to represent human language), you will be able to encode any data you want.
215.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
Granted, technically speaking emojis are not part of the "Unicode Standard", but they are standardized by the Unicode Consortium and constitute "Unicode Technical Standard #51": https://www.unicode.org/re
216.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
> and invisible symbols Invisible symbols were in Unicode before Unicode was even a thing (ASCII already has a few). I also don't think emojis are the reason why devs add checks like in the OP, it's much more likely that they j
217.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
> Anthropic used to be in the Google camp I don't think Anthropic took any allegiances here. Amazon already invested $4B last year (Google invested $2B).
218.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
The original title was not poorly worded though. The new one was editorialized to get a certain reaction out of readers — I promise you the responses on this thread would look different with the original title.
219.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
This was also my thinking — if you ask ChatGPT to design a DB schema design it often looks good at first glance but is actually pretty bad. If a candidate uses AI as a help to solve their task, yet the output is still good, great! It's
220.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
For context, the take home we're looking to do would happen after we've already interviewed them. We're not thinking of anything huge — something like an hour of work. We're also doing a paid trial period, though that
221.
▲
Ask HN: What are some of the best take-home coding tasks you've gotten?
10 points
by
n2d4
2y ago
|
38 comments
222.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
What they're saying is rather, "I don't want to engage in a social network that is an echo chamber of someone else's beliefs."
223.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
This is such an odd comment. In the thread you linked, Gwern says in response to someone else that NNs excel at many complex real-world tasks even if there are some tasks where they fail but humans (or other models) succeed. You try to co
224.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
Election betting is legal. But that doesn't mean it's unregulated (which Polymarket is).
225.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
Ridiculous is also that they say this when Polymarket gave Trump only 60%-40% odds. They're falling for the same logical fallacy as everyone who knows nothing about prediction markets.
226.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
You're not missing anything — that's exactly how it is. There's nothing that stipulates that US companies must sell to other US companies, and it's a great place for investments & startups, so even if Polymarket isn&
227.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
Even if election bets are legal, the betting market is still highly regulated.
228.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
`using` is not a thing in JS
229.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
To be fair, 95% down since ChatGPT came to life is also a lot
230.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
Sadly it needs a language feature that doesn't exist yet
231.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
Not without latency. Unless you make sure everything's on the edge? But that is way more complicated anyways — now you have two systems to maintain, instead of just a single client-only JS app.
232.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
The map kind of does. It's really nice to just click on different dots and see different cities with no latency or page load. I think the right way to implement this is as an SPA with `history.push` for shareable URLs.
233.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
Seems to work for parent's link on my iPhone (but not OP's link)
234.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
Highly unlikely. The more likely truth is just that the default temperature of ChatGPT is really low (but not quite zero); so it keeps spitting out (roughly) the same story. It does switch up protagonists a bit and different versions of Cha
235.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
I thought the implicit assumption in their comment was that OP/grandparent isn't American.
236.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
It's anecdotal, but the easiest way to understand them is to just travel to a conservative state and talk to them. Even if you won't agree, you'll see that they exist
237.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
This is IMO one of the coolest use cases of AI. With a half-decent prompt, an LLM is pretty good at tasks like those.
238.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
Yes, but it would've been much more interesting to read about title drops where this is not the case. The top titledrops listed that are not names of a character are all names of something else, like locations or objects.
239.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
"Subtly different"? It's not even remotely the same thing, all they have in common is that the unit is %. The betting probability is the (expected) chance that a certain candidate wins, while polls measure the % of population
240.
▲
by
n2d4
2y ago
> As is often said you cannot reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into. But the point here is that you also cannot reason someone out of a position that they did reason themselves into. In the first st
More ›