muyuu

7 ms·

121.
by muyuu 6mo ago
The changes to reduce inference costs are intentional. Last thing you're going to do is have users linger on an older version that spends much more. This is essentially what's going on with layers upon layers of social engineering
122.
by muyuu 6mo ago
If you get consistently nowhere near 50% then surely you know you're not throwing a fair coin? What would complaining to the coin provider achieve? Switch coins. *typo
123.
by muyuu 6mo ago
currently most industrialised countries are in a demographic decline, sometimes patched by immigration that will burden their economies long term much more than they will help them China is a deeper decline than Japan too, which will make t
124.
by muyuu 6mo ago
i would try kimi Qwen has also been improving recently, in fact most have, so depending on when you last tried them you can try again and see how they work for you My local Qwen is decent for some things, Kimi is decent for most things and
125.
by muyuu 6mo ago
which ones have you tried? some are not far off, but it depends on what you do
126.
by muyuu 6mo ago
I don't think there has been any exponential in terms on inference costs in the last couple of years. In fact, they have worsened as the same relevant hardware is more expensive and so is energy - and to top it off, to stay SotA compan
127.
by muyuu 6mo ago
What has actually changed? It's unclear how much can you do right now, unless they've already switched you to the new plan and you're speaking from experience.
128.
by muyuu 6mo ago
People don't pay double the $100 account in fixed recurrent payments if they don't intend to use a lot more than they would use in the $100 subscription. Perhaps people at Anthropic should ask Sonnet (or Kimi, it's much bette
129.
by muyuu 7mo ago
it amounts to service limit obfuscation, and their market are very clued about that nobody wants them to add fineprint every time users find effective ways to actually use the service to its advertised limits, it only benefits those who wan
130.
by muyuu 7mo ago
not really, no being honest would be to just adjust the limits rather than adding piecewise limitations but of course with honesty comes that people can actually gauge your product accurately and they may not want that
131.
by muyuu 7mo ago
You are correct, but you don't need openclaw to batch your work. People will figure out ways to use their tokens at that fixed price. Sure there is a difference. It's like when most mobile companies wouldn't allow tethering b
132.
by muyuu 7mo ago
Perhaps. So let them come clean about what they can offer. At that price, people are going to make the best of their subscription whatever it is that's on offer. Time to compete on value with the Chinese.
133.
by muyuu 7mo ago
It's one thing to pay $5 or $20 per month, which although it's a substantial difference, people pay that much for the convenience of having stuff ready and available - and it's a completely different thing to pay $200 per mon
134.
by muyuu 7mo ago
For me it's surprising that they expected anything other than heavy utilisation at that price point. People don't subscribe at those prices and forget about it.
135.
by muyuu 7mo ago
looking at the other replies I'm not seeing what I consider the most important rebuttal to this argument: there is no real "adopting" in this hybrid open/close space right now, the lock-in is minimal and as much as diffe
136.
by muyuu 7mo ago
the problem with Roman-Napoleonic systems is that this will let you find changes to articles in law codes, but large swathes of the law are just declared out of context, and its interaction with the rest of law is for lawyers and judges to
137.
by muyuu 7mo ago
It's fear.
138.
by muyuu 7mo ago
but the market doesn't need to be free for basic market pressure to have an overwhelming effect
139.
by muyuu 7mo ago
can't reply to your comment below so i will comment here > why does it bother you to give attribution? why do you think crediting the writer impacts how the piece stands? clearly it does to you? thing is, this is a fool's erran
140.
by muyuu 7mo ago
For a while, people found solace in denial: "it's not good, it will never be good, and i will always be able to tell" next stop will be to ask for some sort of regulation
141.
by muyuu 7mo ago
it's crazy that people nowadays seriously question basic market pressure being a thing
142.
by muyuu 7mo ago
this is hard to evaluate, but we cannot replicate the old web search experience not just of Google, but Altavista, Lycos or Yahoo, when most of the web is siloed and increasingly botted - simply because the stuff you see in the siloed inter
143.
by muyuu 7mo ago
America enforces their law all around the world. They also have a strong power to lobby and set legal trends all over the world. It's a good thing NK don't have the capability, and perhaps the will also to do so.
144.
by muyuu 7mo ago
i 100% agree with you, but we cannot make the argument that the conditions were remotely comparable decades ago they really weren't
145.
by muyuu 7mo ago
the people who are invading another country in a war of conquest, for instance you seem to believe we live in a world where there no longer are such wars of single-handed aggression we don't live in that world
146.
by muyuu 7mo ago
it's good work if it helps the right people
147.
by muyuu 7mo ago
unironically those pushing for blatantly unconstitutional laws should be charged for sedition and moved to a death penalty state but that is an American solution, not a worldwide one and this is happening everywhere would be great if the US
148.
by muyuu 7mo ago
because the laws are coming with massive fines and penalties that will apply to people not even selling anything unless you can confidently dodge American law enforcement, which is a big ask unless you are solidly anonymous somehow, then yo
149.
by muyuu 7mo ago
goes well beyond that that is just the US
150.
by muyuu 7mo ago
tbf, when most of those posting here were children, access to smartphones/tablets with unrestricted internet connection wasn't a problem but i do remember my parents actually raising me pretty hands-on, taking care of me not watch

More ›