muyuu

49 ms·

661.
by muyuu 7y ago
Both Amazon and Microsoft have essentially failed in the mainstream mobile market. I can see why they don't want to lose money.
662.
by muyuu 7y ago
Lock-in through privileges in access to infrastructure, control via default services, "system as a service" etc means OSS licences no longer provide much of a guarantee towards the ownership and control of your own software and ha
663.
by muyuu 7y ago
One thing that's holding me back is that my early 2014 maxed-out 13in Macbook Pro model is still pretty great. I find it better than the 2018 I use at work. Better keyboard, MUCH better trackpad (although I'm using the mouse more
664.
by muyuu 7y ago
As do all companies based in China. Huawei has long been suspected of doing a lot of network espionage work for the Chinese government - as are Chinese social networks, chat apps, mail apps, etc - but we also know for sure that Silicon Vall
665.
by muyuu 7y ago
Well, as Patton knew, the rules are set by power first and negotiation second. Negotiation failed, power is kicking in.
666.
by muyuu 7y ago
Any issues with that model? I'm thinking of doing a similar switch but I really don't want to be fighting driver and compatibility issues.
667.
by muyuu 7y ago
Without the proprietary and exclusive hardware, something like CUDA would DoA. Wolfram is trying that, as MathCad and Maple did back in the day and still MATHLAB kind of pulled off (Octave is coming though). This is a pretty steep slope the
668.
by muyuu 8y ago
usually it goes like "technically yes but in practice no"
669.
by muyuu 9y ago
meta
670.
by muyuu 9y ago
Isn't OSS grand?
671.
by muyuu 9y ago
"Then deluded myself and told the story"
672.
by muyuu 9y ago
Not a single company in the field has a 100% guaranteed future. Even Microsoft, completely dominating in the 90s, is now second fiddle to the likes of Google and has their future jeopardised by the emergence of the cloud and mobile platform
673.
by muyuu 9y ago
BitTorrent is going nowhere. Some uses are being - temporarily or not, we'll see - less popular. It remains critical.
674.
by muyuu 9y ago
>EDIT: I just noticed that Matthew Green published a blog post about this titled "Attack ...". That's really surprising :/ How so? He consistently sensationalises his stuff.
675.
by muyuu 9y ago
A lot of IP advantage will be wiped off. It will benefit some people, but not the actors behind the errors themselves.
676.
by muyuu 9y ago
Common for around 10 years, generalised for around 5 years.
677.
by muyuu 9y ago
Because the system is rigged, folks.
678.
by muyuu 10y ago
How do you pronounce it? Like Pitbull in "dale!"?
679.
by muyuu 10y ago
>- Lack of self awareness and introspection. Not being able to give specific examples of times you've made a mistake and how you learned from it. >- Shit talking old coworkers, general attitude that you're great and nothing
680.
by muyuu 10y ago
Because it's the Scheme way.
681.
by muyuu 10y ago
Any code or real results to show for it? I'm a bit sceptical about claims in papers because I've found a lot of overstatements in them. Even in those with easily reproducible algorithms, that when you go and execute them, they sim
682.
by muyuu 10y ago
"It works in my computer."
683.
by muyuu 10y ago
Long may this continue, because otherwise the implications for privacy and anonymity rights are extreme. In some concrete fields like web/SNS, I believe completely surrendering your persona online is already a requirement. Let's h
684.
by muyuu 10y ago
AMD already do that, but no it's not like ML/AI is the main market right now. Nowhere near.
685.
by muyuu 10y ago
I first studied the K&R in the early 90s, and it was already terrible by then. Especially if you wanted to teach anything other than quirky systems programming. From the software engineering point of view, almost every single code examp
686.
by muyuu 10y ago
>thinking it's the K&R of C++. You nailed it with that analogy though. K&R is a "first book" and important historically, but right now it's an atrocious book if you want to learn current C and this has been th
687.
by muyuu 10y ago
Reminds me of the Bitcoinica fiasco. Stuff happens, especially under pressure. But yeah, if that happens to you, there is no more reasonable course of action than changing it right away.
688.
by muyuu 10y ago
Last time I tried it I did on a virtualbox VM and everything seemed to work. I don't see anything in your link, by the way.
689.
by muyuu 10y ago
>I think Delphi will die, but only because it costs a fortune today. If it had a resonable price, many people would continue to use it indeterminately. http://www.lazarus-ide.org/
690.
by muyuu 10y ago
It's perfectly workable. The bot just needs to weigh its trades properly and provided the sentiment signal has any alpha, it can be combined with other analysis to run a profitable strategy. I've seen this working and working very

More ›