murz

10 ms·

61.
by murz 15y ago
Reminds me of Michigan left. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_left
62.
by murz 15y ago
I think requiring a log-in is actually against the CAN-SPAM regulations. FTC.gov's web site states: "an e-mail recipient cannot be required to pay a fee, provide information other than his or her e-mail address and opt-out preferences, or t
63.
by murz 15y ago
"We take it for granted now that the most popular online publications rely on search engine traffic for their survival." "..blindly approve any headline that name-checks a trending topic or two." "..we are reminded of the grimy truth: makin
64.
by murz 15y ago
The G+ names policy doesn't say "name on your birth certificate". It says "the name you commonly go by in real life", see: http://www.google.com/support/+/bin/answer.py?answer=1228271 Even if Skud does go by that name in daily life, I don
65.
by murz 15y ago
Not for name violations. For name violations users just get their G+ profile suspended. "When an account is suspended for violating the Google+ common name standards, access to Gmail or other products unrelated to the Google+ profile are no
66.
by murz 15y ago
https://plus.google.com/111499908439497508351/posts/dESepcDj... "We discovered an issue with the version of the iPhone Google+ App that was on the App Store. When we launched, the App Store started serving a previous test version of the A
67.
by murz 15y ago
> Who knows what violates their community standards http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=...
68.
by murz 15y ago
> Note: If you're using Internet Explorer 7, the dots on the chart will not appear in the correct place. Go figure.
69.
by murz 15y ago
> You also have to annotate your code with type information (a la javadoc) to take full advantage of the compiler I consider this an upside, especially on large JavaScript products with many engineers contributing (like the ones Google
70.
by murz 15y ago
> they're a giant company who is using their search monopoly to undercut smaller competitors in the smart phone market. How exactly is Google using their search monopoly to undercut smaller (or larger for that matter) competitors in the
71.
by murz 15y ago
> Out of curiosity, what is the excellent reference for Javascript. I've always liked: http://eloquentjavascript.net/ and https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript/Reference
72.
by murz 15y ago
Scala and Clojure can both be deployed to Google AppEngine.
73.
by murz 15y ago
> 'Social' is the new 'cloud' buzzword. New? What rock have you been hiding under?
74.
by murz 15y ago
From the "About" page ( http://bandilab.org/about.html ): The main goals of the Bandicoot system are: - efficient implementation of the relational algebra - clean language for programmers (rather than "English speakers") - easy to understan
75.
by murz 15y ago
> Its Microsoft The test262 suite was actually published by the ECMA international standards body, although Microsoft did contribute their tests. The direct link to the suite is http://test262.ecmascript.org/ And the announcement from
76.
by murz 15y ago
That's not exactly correct. According to the article Hertzfeld was the key interface designer behind the Circles UI in Google+. The Google-wide visual redesign is the result of a lot of people's work.
77.
by murz 15y ago
> Perhaps allowing them to interact with Facebook There's no way facebook would play along with that.
78.
by murz 15y ago
From the horses mouth: "we believe that being open about these security issues helps users better protect their information online." The attacks relied on the victim's naivety and lack of knowledge. If you read the blog post [1], I think it
79.
by murz 15y ago
older, more active discussion is here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2518609
80.
by murz 15y ago
Last year ICE seized 9 other domains too (also mostly video streaming). Details here: http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/01/business/la-fi-ct-pi...
81.
by murz 15y ago
I'm curious what the sources would have to gain by leaking this information? In the Reuters article it says they had "direct knowledge of the discussions", why would they risk their jobs to leak something like this? I don't get it.
82.
by murz 15y ago
> You suck at estimating! Took me a while to learn that one, but it's so true.