mupuff1234

62 ms·

1021.
by mupuff1234 5y ago
That makes me wonder how easy it is to just hide certain features during the review process.
1022.
by mupuff1234 5y ago
I think the key word there is "income" - At some point income barely plays a role.
1023.
by mupuff1234 5y ago
Of course, despite being employed by a giant corp myself, i'd like to think that i'm not completely amoral :) But I have become very cynical of any sort of corporate gymnastics done in order to justify their actions. A future wher
1024.
by mupuff1234 5y ago
> "operates as an independent entity, although its wages and other costs are covered by Facebook. It is made up of journalists, human rights activists, lawyers and academics" Not sure how one can be independent and yet get a sa
1025.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
Most car manufacturers sell trucks, vans, etc as well.
1026.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
Quite the opposite, context is a critical aspect voice assistants currently lack.
1027.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
It's not as clear cut IMO. I'd argue that general societal prosperity is in the best interest of a lot of companies (and their shareholders).
1028.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
I don't think having one in the past should be a "get out of jail" free pass for future offenses.
1029.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
Apple has about 60% share of mobile phones in the US. I'd say it definitely should be considered a monopoly.
1030.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
"Could be worth up to". Not quite the same as actually worth.
1031.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
That list mostly strengthens my impressions tbh. Aside from Xbox, can't say I know any person that is really excited by any of those products. I am surprised that MS seems to fly under the anti-trust radar nowadays and I wonder how muc
1032.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
What good products are they making? Haven't used any of their products in ages but I still get the impression that no one really enjoys their products (excluding excel maybe?)
1033.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
Can't say I'm against for-profit education as long as there is a government funded affordable option.
1034.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
What are the underlying issues?
1035.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
There's no inherit reason why lidar can't be cheap afaik (and it's already getting there - prices are dropping pretty rapidly).
1036.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
I think the short case is pretty obvious - basically a re-run of blockbuster. I do think they can adapt and survive as a business, but i doubt they have a future of growth or big profitability.
1037.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
I usually have the opposite phenomenon. I go traveling for a few weeks sleeping in different places with no issues whatsoever. But then when I'm back home I find myself waking up in the middle of the night not grasping where I am for a
1038.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
I believe Google has something pretty similar called Google contributor, not sure what's it's status.
1039.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
So on one hand, since humans can drive using only vision - lidar isn't needed. But on the other hand, even though humans don't need that much training data suddenly vast amounts of data is absolutely required?
1040.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
I've had the same sunny bike from begining of March and after -250 rides I have to encounter an issue.
1041.
by mupuff1234 6y ago
That approach seems somewhat naive. I think we should definitely acknowledge that politics do play a role in these mega corporations. This is especially true in the ML field, where choosing something as "innocent" as a training da