Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
munksbeer
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
121.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
We still review everything. And we guide by planning, prompting, speccing. So we're not actually much faster at the core code, because reviews still take time. Ultimately, we're on the finance markets and we have regulatory pressu
122.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
Isn't it just the same thing? You loan the company money and in return they give you a note that says you get a portion of the company and dividends? Different mechanics, but stripping everything away, roughly the same.
123.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
Claude writes probably 95% of our code now, fintech, amongst top 5 in the world in what we do. I am 100% certain we're not even at the forefront of using agents for coding compared to some others. It definitely can scale.
124.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
> We need laws around this stuff. The EU created laws around this (GDPR). Americans seem to hate them.
125.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
I keep seeing this sentiment. Claude Code cli works very well for me. To lay my cards out, I think the negativity towards it isn't driven by anything objective, but by anti-AI / anti-big-tech sentiment.
126.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
In the UK, you have to do KYC checks, and any crypto you buy will be visible to HMRC (taxman). If you dispose of it for monero, this is a taxable event, and they can tell your crypto has moved. You may not get pinged immediately, but HMRC c
127.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
> Just that. Like insurance, it was not there to make anyone's lives better This is revisionism. That is not at all how it started.
128.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
What did you mean? I can't really understand your first comment, and this one doesn't explain it any further.
129.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
It's probably a typo. He meant sealed interface. I think that should be quite obvious.
130.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
It sounds like you are speaking to someone who has actually experienced this and you have not. Trying to be civil here, I'll phrase it like this: Try not to be so judgemental over a keyboard when you have no experience to speak from. L
131.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
>Consuming copyrighted material personally is fully legal, training a model on that same copy-righted material is illegal. Where is the contention? The contention is obvious in your statement. Is it illegal to train a model, and why? Why
132.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
I remember thinking like this about software development several years ago. "AI will never be able to reason and write code as well as a human". I was terribly wrong. I assume you will end up being wrong about engineering too.
133.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
I don't think it is easy, otherwise this wouldn't be such a contentious and frequently discussed issue. A human who trains their brain on material they don't own then creates art or writes code based on this training, sells t
134.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
When discussing this, may I ask (I know you are probably bored of the actual arguments), what does "trained models on data that wasn't theirs" actually mean in practice? Again, I know these arguments have been done to death,
135.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
I've just realised how infrequently I visit regular websites these days. Everything is trashed, popups, cookie requests, ads splattered everywhere. I read some blogs that get linked from hn. I read some reddit subs. And I use LLMs for
136.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
> Cursor is training data and hostile distillation. What is "hostile distillation" please?
137.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
The US has started doing it too.
138.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
What happens when teens lives start getting properly ruined because they end up on the dark web or other sites? What about when the first teen commits suicide because they were lured into a honeypot vpn and their data used to blackmail? Wil
139.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
>I want it to not be normal to spend all day on TikTok I would like that too, but I genuinely believe these measures are going to make things worse for children, for the reason I explained.
140.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
That includes hackernews right?
141.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
You are really so naive to think that banning the big public social media sites is going to stop children from seeing bad things on the internet? I promise you, within a few years there is going to be an underground social media network or
142.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
AI currently surpasses humans at many tasks, and the list grows every month. My guess is that within 20 years (as a hedging my bets 95% confidence level) AI will surpass our intelligence for almost everything. The arguments over whether it
143.
▲
BBCBreakfast interview – 'We will make further statements in July about VPNs'
(twitter.com)
3 points
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
|
1 comments
144.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
Just absurd. But I think the majority of parent voters love this stuff.
145.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
> "iroh is a modular networking stack written in Rust. You can omit the "written in Rust" part, but then you'd lose street cred.
146.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
He is a vested interest, so we can pretty much dismiss what he says. Even in that post he makes some logical fallacies.
147.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
I doubt this will turn out to be true. That seems trivially easy to solve for with correct training.
148.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
> The fatalist philosophers and authors have been mostly proven right as time marched on. In what sense? Most people today would not choose to go an live at any other point in history, except for window between about 1960 and 2008. Life
149.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
> They only emulate reasoning. So do we.
150.
▲
by
munksbeer
4mo ago
>Speaking practically your hypothetical is a scenario that requires somebody that is proactively interested in, and theoretically capable of, making a e.g. dangerous virus, yet are unwilling/unable to do so without a chatbot. How ma
More ›