mulmen

21 ms·

421.
by mulmen 1y ago
I have some ideas I want to post on your personal webpage but you have not given me access. Why are you censoring me?
422.
by mulmen 1y ago
If they really want to free up the spot there’s a good chance the driver is closer than the tow truck.
423.
by mulmen 1y ago
Yeah it makes it easier. And I’m appreciative of the idea of making address entry easier for users but if they have to disambiguate did you actually make it easier? I think Zillow does it best. You just type your address in a box and it l
424.
by mulmen 1y ago
Just add a delay.
425.
by mulmen 1y ago
In Seattle there are 3-minute load/unload areas in the commercial pockets. This is a solvable problem. It’s not even hard.
426.
by mulmen 1y ago
Except when it isn’t. I’d be curious to know the population in areas where a zip code spans multiple counties.
427.
by mulmen 1y ago
Why would you do this?
428.
by mulmen 1y ago
Or moving areas like aircraft carriers.
429.
by mulmen 1y ago
Social awkwardness is not a medical condition. It may be that ASD leads to social awkwardness but that doesn’t mean social awkwardness is ASD.
430.
by mulmen 1y ago
Maybe so but that’s not clear from your comment which is why I asked for clarification. Clearly you’re unwilling or unable to provide that so there’s nowhere else for this conversation to go.
431.
by mulmen 1y ago
The problem with local apps is actually a problem with closed-source software. I refuse to rely on closed-source software to access my data because then I am beholden to the vendor of that software to access my data. It’s only slightly be
432.
by mulmen 1y ago
You have moved the goalposts from government institutions to political institutions. The department of education is not a political institution. USAID is not a political institution. The IRS is not a political institution. I have faith
433.
by mulmen 1y ago
You literally quoted (with a “>”) and replied to a comment with a highlighted (using italics) quote from the article and told the commenter they are incorrect.
434.
by mulmen 1y ago
How does your highlighted quote refute injidup‘s claim?
435.
by mulmen 1y ago
Social awkwardness and autism are not the same thing.
436.
by mulmen 1y ago
Is autism a thing for dogs? I have literally never thought about this but I guess it could be a thing.
437.
by mulmen 1y ago
I think constantly repeating negativity that undermines faith in institutions and our ability to effect change is harmful because it’s self fulfilling. There. That’s an idea you can debate.
438.
by mulmen 1y ago
> I disagree that phones are unique in being fragile without protection. Not sure who you are replying to because I didn’t say that.
439.
by mulmen 1y ago
> The customer service experience that I get from Google is orders of magnitude better than anything that I've gotten from a staffed government agency. Really? That’s the exact opposite of my experience. How do you even contact Go
440.
by mulmen 1y ago
You don’t leave the bumpers out at all times. The decking and furniture are all built from suitable materials to not need additional protection. Phone cases are an anomaly.
441.
by mulmen 1y ago
Destroying the TSA is a specific goal. It’s not random destruction. It’s a specific redundant organization. I still don’t see why we should try to cut into the bone of our society. I see no benefit to careless destruction.
442.
by mulmen 1y ago
> The point is to remove the most egregious of failures, and let literally anything else take their place. Define egregious. Why would the next thing be any different than what it replaced? > Sometimes things fail so badly that a ran
443.
by mulmen 1y ago
Capitalism is an economic system. It’s not a system of government. The government exists to solve the problems the economic system can’t. I think it’s dangerous to apply corporate management practices to the system that literally governs
444.
by mulmen 1y ago
I refuse the conclusion because the alternative is hopeless. Random destruction might be the best kind of destruction but that doesn’t mean destruction leads to efficiency. If politicians are inevitable why would what comes next be any les
445.
by mulmen 1y ago
Agreed. But while I agree political operators corrupt all objective processes I refuse to conclude that we should cause random destruction instead.
446.
by mulmen 1y ago
Well if our choice is a hypothetical fire all the political operators or fire randomly then random will leave more political operators.
447.
by mulmen 1y ago
I don’t see the problem. You explained the risks, leadership said they accept those risks. What was supposed to be done differently?
448.
by mulmen 1y ago
I honestly can't tell what this would mean other than 2 square feet in inches. What's the other option?
449.
by mulmen 1y ago
Yeah just drive around West Texas and come in the other side.
450.
by mulmen 1y ago
Dealer’s choice.

More ›