muldvarp

5 ms·

31.
by muldvarp 3mo ago
What are they claiming then? Allard says that people whose only connection to Sweden is being born there are not Swedish (which is correct) and that they would have to leave. I don't see the connection to ethnonationalism here.
32.
by muldvarp 3mo ago
Anybody that has to work for a living is fucked and not on the "can't do mathematics which they would find fulfilling"-level but on the "can't afford food, because human intelligence is simply not required anymore&q
33.
by muldvarp 3mo ago
> It's been fun watching the cope collapse from day to day. No one told me a slow takeoff Singularity would have so much schadenfreude. I'm constantly surprised at how much schadenfreude there is on hacker news about LLMs. Like
34.
by muldvarp 3mo ago
Nobody said that they can't.
35.
by muldvarp 3mo ago
Sweden doesn't appear to have birthright citizenship (jus soli), so people whose only connection to Sweden is being born there are in fact not swedish. If this is your definition of ethnonationalism, then most of the world is already e
36.
by muldvarp 3mo ago
> Some key issues for the Örebro Party locally include strong secularism, a 30-hour workweek with retained pay, lowered wages for politicians, expanded social housing, abolishing preschool-fees, making public transport free of charge, en
37.
by muldvarp 3mo ago
Making things easier (or cheaper) is the entire point of AI. If AI is great because it makes writing software easier (or cheaper), then AI is also terrible when it makes publishing slop easier (or cheaper).
38.
by muldvarp 3mo ago
Well prompt injection is pretty much unfixable. So if they actually saw this as a security vulnerability they would have to remove this feature.
39.
by muldvarp 3mo ago
#1 is as much a gamer's dream as Youtube shorts AI slop is a cinephile's dream.
40.
by muldvarp 3mo ago
What is this referencing?
41.
by muldvarp 3mo ago
I'd love to work for some company distilling frontier models. Seems like interesting work and screwing with OpenAI, Anthropic and Google would feel fantastic.
42.
by muldvarp 4mo ago
> Was it 2016 when Geoff hinton said that radiology was a dead career? Funny how the jobs most at risk of automation now are tech jobs.
43.
by muldvarp 4mo ago
Tech careers no longer exist. Tech jobs will still exist for a few years, but careers they will no longer be.
44.
by muldvarp 4mo ago
I have yet to hear a single convincing argument by a person that works in software why they can't be replaced.
45.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
I got a beautiful Latex template for my master thesis many years ago. I still remember fixing some things and it took me multiple days to figure out how this giant tangled web of a template worked. A year ago I tried to recreate the same lo
46.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
How do you know? You can easily create AI generated text that is impossible to identify as such.
47.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
I think be both agree that the future of software engineering is very uncertain right now (and likely will be for years). For me personally that alone is enough to recommend not investing money and time to get into software engineering anym
48.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
But saying "LLMs are not good at architecture so software engineering has a bright future" is _also_ extrapolation.
49.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
I think it would be even more clear if you just write what you mean.
50.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
LLMs are trained to mimic human language production. If humans have heartstrings and the LLM does a good job at mimicking human language production, it will also mimic those heartstrings.
51.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
I don't think it matters if the reasoning is philosophically "real" if it can solve real problems.
52.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
The fact that AI currently requires some human supervision to produce valuable results is not a good predictor that it will stay this way sadly. LLMs were basically unable to reason two years ago. They are now better at many reasoning tasks
53.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
I don't get this argument because a paycheck isn't necessary for the system to "work" either. Serfdom and slavery "worked" for hundreds of years.
54.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
I agree but AI is a) owned by rich people and b) (sadly) too useful for this to matter.
55.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
There is literally nothing in it for me (all productivity gains will be pocketed by my employer) and there are many reasons to be afraid of it.
56.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
Wasn't that obvious the second ChatGPT 3.5 released?
57.
by muldvarp 5mo ago
I don't get it either. LLMs put the enshittification of software engineering into overdrive. The job is less fun (reviewing AI slop, sometimes even produced by entirely non-tech people like managers), the expectation of increased produ
58.
by muldvarp 6mo ago
Manual verification that the "judge" judges correctly. Also, how exactly do you programmatically validate CVEs?
59.
by muldvarp 7mo ago
Creating more friction can also lead to a higher percentage of bots. I for one immefiately leave when I realize that I need to jump through several hoops before I'm actually allowed to participate on a site. Someone building a bot farm
60.
by muldvarp 7mo ago
The two that came online in 2023 and 2024 are hardly a success story if you look at their history.

More ›