mukyu

34 ms·

301.
by mukyu 16y ago
My actual thoughts on the issues related to inclusion and deletion are not what I was trying to address. I contributed to Wikipedia for a time and saw and was part of deletion sprees on both of the sides. Something like this happens every
302.
by mukyu 16y ago
Plan A doesn't work. It is actually easier to delete things from pages than deleting pages themselves. If you edit war over it you will lose. Plan B does not work. Wikipedia guidelines do not consider self-published sources as 'reliable'
303.
by mukyu 16y ago
Getting people to rally around anything that someone is trying to have deleted is a sure-fire way to get it deleted, protected from recreation, and basically never coming back. It is like some kind of 'defend the hive' kind of reaction.
304.
by mukyu 16y ago
I wanted to post about this, but I could not remember the name and googling things like '(collaborative OR crowdsource) static binary analysis' was futile. Thanks, it was driving me insane.
305.
by mukyu 16y ago
https://github.com/Laurelai/decompile-dump/blob/master/outpu... "WARNING: CHLLCode::appendTypeIdent: declaring type void as int for param2" http://www.google.com/codesearch?as_q=WARNING%3A+CHLLCode%3A... http://boomerang.sf.net/ is cl
306.
by mukyu 16y ago
No. There is just too much information lost going from source to binary and when you use optimization the results are more information lost, not less. The idea works well enough if you just want get optimized asm though. http://events.c
307.
by mukyu 16y ago
I doubt that HBGary had the source to Stuxnet. Even the source is not that useful. Its infection vectors are known. It does not really use novel worm techniques. They would not be able to sign a different rootkit payload without the stole
308.
by mukyu 16y ago
"As with the report on Tuesday, the preliminary examination given to Congress in August found no evidence of flawed electronics in vehicles that crashed. That examination found only one instance in which an accelerator pedal became trapped
309.
Law Firm Finds Success Targeting Those Who Post Copyrighted Images(techland.time.com)
2 points by mukyu 16y ago|0 comments
310.
by mukyu 16y ago
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://... My Email Privacy is Worth more than $36 per year By gherlein, on February 6th, 2011 - No comments I’ve been using Google Apps Mail to host my mail for herlein.com for years.
311.
by mukyu 16y ago
There is also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES_instruction_set
312.
by mukyu 16y ago
I do not think it would matter if Sergey and Page personally delivered a stone slab engraved with a statement that Google does not use their toolbar's clicks. As you say, you would have to rely on trusting their statements. You seem to req
313.
by mukyu 16y ago
You are being disingenuous. That you cannot find them explicitly denying something does not therefore make it true nor provide any evidence that it is true. “Absolutely not. The PageRank feature sends back URLs, but we’ve never used those U
314.
by mukyu 16y ago
Google has said they do not use clickstream data for ranking from Google toolbar. They did have variations of their tests. Cutts mentioned this during the bigthink panel. Sometimes they went to Bing first or not, sometimes they clicked on
315.
by mukyu 16y ago
We need to get over this partisan "gotcha journalism". No one really benefits from everyone making low content blog posts with any random accusations that make their side 'right' (which just happens to be ad hominem anyways).
316.
by mukyu 16y ago
https targets for forms on http pages are a security anti-pattern. The Tunisian government keylogged people's Facebook details because of it.
317.
by mukyu 16y ago
You have very little actual knowledge of what their experiments entailed.
318.
by mukyu 16y ago
Why does he think that Google were not aware of the clickstream data when they set up (several) experiments where they specifically install what they thought were sources for the clicks and then purposefully clicked?
319.
by mukyu 16y ago
The English wikipedia has a redirect at [[Torsoraphy]] that was created hours ago. [1] Google observed this behavior months ago. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Torsoraphy&old...
320.
by mukyu 16y ago
"We learn from our customers. We use our customer's data." That sounds like an admission to me, and he is really dodging and spinning the question.
321.
by mukyu 16y ago
Editors, not edits.
322.
by mukyu 16y ago
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/05/23/60474... where i originally heard about it
323.
by mukyu 16y ago
What professors? The only one I know of that is involved is Dave Touretzky, who has only posted a copy of the other's work after they were sued. I do not think they have taken any action against him.
324.
by mukyu 16y ago
He does not exactly make a cogent argument. Paraphrasing part of it, "Stuxnet was made in China because Realtek and JMicron are Taiwanese, which is basically China."
325.
by mukyu 16y ago
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/011811-feds-hackers-at... this is the article that matches the headline, the current link is about the IETF
326.
by mukyu 16y ago
They do security research. Furthermore, they practice responsible disclosure principles (sometimes). That is pretty much the definition of a white hat hacker. I think using professional to describe them is a stretch, but classifying them
327.
by mukyu 16y ago
I never said that running 1:1 backups is anything near the accomplishments in other instances. I am not the one trying to make a strong claim here. Anyone saying 'let people run linux on it or they will hack it, which leads to piracy' is
328.
by mukyu 16y ago
PSJailbreak did not come from the homebrew scene and you cannot honestly think people were going to pay $150 just to run homebrew that didn't even exist. You said I should not ascribe PSJailbreak to be for piracy and yet in the same breath
329.
by mukyu 16y ago
I do not think they make that case well at all. If you look at what happened with the last generation of consoles, everything but the PS3 had piracy before anyone had unsigned code running. They ignored basically all of the security measu
330.
by mukyu 16y ago
The NET Act criminalized many instances of copyright infringement, but they are not normally pursued in that manner. Also, criminal and civil are not mutually exclusive. They can be both.

More ›