mugsie

35 ms·

301.
by mugsie 11y ago
Well.... this is depressing - Mattermost server is made available under two separate licensing options: - Free Software Foundation’s GNU AGPL v.3.0, subject to the exceptions outlined in this policy; or - Commercial licenses available from
302.
by mugsie 11y ago
yes, and I do. I actually use slack via the IRC gateways, and the push notifications from IRC are nearly always 2-3 mins ahead of the slack ones.
303.
by mugsie 11y ago
Isn't everyone's CDN offering through Akamai these days?
304.
by mugsie 11y ago
That looks really cool! Will have a look at how we could implement it. One problem is that we run across multiple services, on multiple machines, so we would have to have some way of passing a customer ID into our AZ level logstash forwarde
305.
by mugsie 11y ago
And I commented, as it calls itself ultimate, and it has articles about Java, Node, Apache, Linux (including SystemD) and Windows. If it was titled "We want to build the Ultimate Logging Resource" I would be OK with it. I would ha
306.
by mugsie 11y ago
Couple of reasons - 1. You need to stick to compliance requirements. 2. Tracking individual transactions (user complains about $Problem - if you attach a request ID to each request, and pass it between all components, you can find the exac
307.
by mugsie 11y ago
did a quick scan - nginx just returns generic "linux" / "systemd" (and node for some reason). ruby - you guessed it - node.
308.
by mugsie 11y ago
https://www.loggly.com/ultimate-guide/?s=parse+WSGI+logs&pos... 0 results https://www.loggly.com/ultimate-guide/?s=parse+python+logs&p... Gives you a page on NodeJS Ultimate ... not so muc
309.
by mugsie 11y ago
And this is why we can't have nice things.
310.
by mugsie 11y ago
As someone who worked in a company that didn't always have access to the customer machine that ran our software, I can confirm. There might have been a magic page in the software that allowed raw SQL queries...
311.
by mugsie 11y ago
Sorry - you are right, with the scale of Amazon they are within a region. But that is still not Geo-Redundant. If a hurricane takes out Virgina, you are still going to loose your data.
312.
by mugsie 11y ago
RDS is not "geo-redundant". It is an multi-AZ DB, which is very different to multi-region. (Availability Zones (AZs) are within a DC, regions are separate DCs)
313.
by mugsie 11y ago
"Vulnerabilities like ShellShock simply vanish" - eh .... not really. Shellshock was not just from SSH, it was any program that used environment variables to pass data around. Immutable infrastructure is a great ideal, but has var
314.
by mugsie 11y ago
Seems to be OK for anyone using non beta versions of Ubuntu as well: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2015/CVE-20...
315.
by mugsie 11y ago
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2015/CVE-20...
316.
by mugsie 11y ago
There is still the issue of the CA that is in place for anchor - your users have to trust it.
317.
by mugsie 11y ago
no, for many reasons: You should have no way to login to the docker container Dockers networking does not allow that for that IP to be visable.
318.
by mugsie 11y ago
while promising a much better one...
319.
by mugsie 11y ago
or, you know, publish the formula, so readers can reproduce in whatever language / system they want. Reproducibility is a big push.... but not like you are suggesting. Shipping a dockerfile is the equivalent of saying "This works,
320.
by mugsie 11y ago
Honestly - I agree about the ELK stack side - piping all your logs into ES / Logstash is a great idea. (Or Splunk / Greylog / Logentries) If you run any sort of distributed system, this is vital. And while that counts as bina
321.
by mugsie 11y ago
Except much nicer - especially if you work with json APIs
322.
by mugsie 11y ago
We have several teams pushing logs into a shared Logstash, over RMQ. Depending on the amount of logs you have, I would suggest you have a separate RMQ cluster for the logs. That said RMQ is a great buffer for logs, incase there is an issue
323.
by mugsie 12y ago
I actually look at from another perspective: It seems to have stemmed from Ops teams saying "What can we do let dev teams build what they want, but in a way we can support it" e.g. - a system needs an entry in the /etc/h
324.
by mugsie 12y ago
That is actually an example of the old style of IT. The person deploying the software had no idea how it worked on an internal level. The person who wrote the software had no idea how it was actually deployed in production. They didn&#x
325.
by mugsie 12y ago
Yup - it does. I just seem to prefer the empathy quote for some reason :)
326.
by mugsie 12y ago
With difficulty. For example - you can still have an Ops team, and they have the required access. The developers access to production is done on a case by case basis, with some sort of tracking of who logged in. and why. Also, doing full pr
327.
by mugsie 12y ago
DevOps as it has been implemented in tons of company is bs. Its like the "Agile" push that companies thought they could get by buying a tool, and changing nothing else (release schedules, feature based release dates etc). My fav
328.
by mugsie 13y ago
but why did they call it bucky? There is a python statsd / collectd -> graphite bridge https://pypi.python.org/pypi/bucky
329.
by mugsie 13y ago
Depends on the situation, and how it is being used. It does take a serious amount of time to set up, but it is so flexible that if you take the time, you will never leave it. It also integrates into everything, and has a very verbose API, s
330.
by mugsie 13y ago
I will say, that in some countries NDA/Non Competes can be problematic to enforce. TBH If you can't trust him with source, I would not have him as a Co-Founder

More ›